“Peabody College of Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA: Brief History.” By Franklin Parker & Betty J. Parker bfparker@frontiernet.net

“Peabody College of Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA: Brief History.”

By Franklin Parker & Betty J. Parker bfparker@frontiernet.net 

(First published in Tennessee Encyclopedia & Culture.  Ed. By Carroll Van West, et. al   Nashville: Tennessee Historical Society, 1998, pp. 359-360).  Access: http://tennesseeencyclopedia.net/imagegallery.php?EntryID=G012

Peabody College of Vanderbilt University (since 1979) has a more than 210-year lineage through seven name changes, making it the fifteenth U.S. college founded after Harvard College in 1636.

Nashville, settled in 1779 as Fort Nashborough, had one of its three land tracts set aside (1784) for a collegiate institution.  Davidson Academy (1785-86) was chartered by North Carolina eleven years before Tennessee statehood in 1796. 

Administered by Principals Thomas B. Craighead (d. 1821) and then James Priestley (1760-1821), Davidson Academy was rechartered by the Tennessee legislature as Cumberland College (1806-26), administered by Presidents Philip Lindsley (1786-1850) and his physician son John Berrien Lindsley (1822-97).

John Berrien Lindsley became chancellor of the rechartered University of Nashville (1827-75).  It was the Peabody Education Fund’s first administrator Barnas Sears (1802-80) who helped transform the University of Nashville’s moribund Literary Department into Peabody Normal College (1875-1909).

George Peabody (1795-1869) was born in Massachusetts; became a wholesale dry goods merchant in the South, first in Georgetown, D.C. (1812, when he was age 17), then in Baltimore (1815-37).  After four previous mercantile buying trips to Europe, he went to London (1837) to sell part of Maryland’s $8 million bond issue to finance the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal and the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad.  He remained in London for the rest of his life (1837-69), a merchant turned U.S. securities broker-banker, head of George Peabody and Co. London. 

Getting older and often ill, he took as partner on October 1, 1854, Boston merchant Junius Spencer Morgan (1813-90), whose son, John Pierpont Morgan (1837-1913) began his international banking career as New York City agent for George Peabody and Co.  George Peabody retired October 1, 1864, withdrew his name from the firm which continued as J.S. Morgan and Co. (1864-90), and continued as Morgan Grenfell Co.  George Peabody was thus the root of the banking house of Morgan.

Now largely forgotten, George Peabody was, before his death on November 4, 1869, the best known philanthropist in the U.S. and Britain. 

At a time when lyceums and chautauquas were popular adult education centers, he founded seven U.S. Peabody Institutes (libraries with lecture halls and lecture funds).  His libraries still serve as public libraries in Peabody, Danvers, Newburyport, and Georgetown (all in Massachusetts); in Thetford, Vermont, and Georgetown, D.C.; and in Baltimore, which originally included an art gallery and Conservatory of Music.  The Peabody Conservatory of Music and the Peabody Institute Reference Library, Baltimore, are now part of the Johns Hopkins University system. 

He founded three museums of science: the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology at Harvard University, the Peabody Museum of Natural History at Yale University, and the Peabody Essex Museum in Salem, Massachusetts (maritime history and Essex County Historical Collections). 

His Peabody Homes of London (1862, 1869, $2.5 million) still house 29,000 low income families.  His Peabody Education Fund (1867, $1 million; doubled in 1869 to $2 million) established him as the model founder of all subsequent large U.S. funds and foundations.

During George Peabody’s May 1, 1866 to May 1, 1867, U.S. visit, he was shocked by Civil War devastation he saw in the South.  Wanting to help heal Civil War wounds and knowing that the ruined southern states lacked the means or will to establish public schools, his $2 million Peabody Education Fund aimed to aid the establishment of public education for both races in 11 former Confederate states plus W. Va. added because of its poverty.

The Peabody Education Fund was fortunate in its administrators, particularly in its first administrator, Barnas Sears, a distinguished New England educator, whose policy used limited resources as a lever to help achieve tax-supported public schools. 

Sears’s policy was to support existing schools in larger towns to serve as models for other communities.  He set a rising scale of monetary aid based on enrollment, required Peabody Education Fund-aided schools to meet ten months a year, have at least one teacher per 50 pupils, required that local citizens more than match Peabody Education Fund grants, and required enactment of laws for permanent tax-supported public schools.

Sears’s second priority was to support teachers institutes for short term teacher training and to encourage at least one teacher training normal school in each of the southern states for long term professional training.  Sears particularly wanted a state-funded normal school in Nashville as a model for the South. 

Despite Peabody Education Fund financial inducements, the Tennessee legislature failed to pass normal school supporting bills in 1868, 1871, and 1873.  In 1874 Sears offered $6,000 annually if the University of Nashville trustees gave land and buildings for a normal school.  Relieved not to spend state funds, the legislature amended the University of Nashville’s charter to establish State Normal School (officially so named, 1875-89; officially renamed but previously also called Peabody Normal College, 1889-1909).

State Normal School opened December 1, 1875, with 13 students and ended the year with 60 students.  When the Tennessee legislature failed to pass State Normal School funding bills in 1877 and 1879, Sears considered moving it to Georgia.  This threat prompted Nashville citizens to guarantee $6,000 annually until state aid began.  Stung into action, the legislature passed appropriations, which totaled $429,000 during 1881-1905.  Peabody Education Fund aid totaled $555,730 during 1875-1909.

Peabody Normal College functioned for 34 years (1875-1909) under three distinguished educators as presidents:  Massachusetts-born Eben S. Stearns (1819-87),  president during 1875-87, New York State-born William Harold Payne (1836-1907), president during 1888-1901; and Tennessee-born James Davis Porter (1828-1912), president during 1901-09.

Peabody Normal College became a leading U.S. normal school in the South and had a national reputation approaching that of Teachers College of Columbia University.  By 1910, however, state university departments of education were replacing normal schools in the professional preparation of teachers.  This changeover coincided with the Peabody Education Fund’s dissolution. 

Founder George Peabody’s original letter of gift permitted the trustees to dissolve after 30 years.  The trustees gave $1.5 million (requiring matching funds) to transform Peabody Normal College into George Peabody College for Teachers (1911-79).

The Methodist Episcopal Church, South, had also established in Nashville a Central University, August 6, 1872.  It was renamed Vanderbilt University, June 6, 1873, after Bishop Holland McTyreire (1824-89) obtained a $1 million donation from Cornelius Vanderbilt (1794-1877).  Wanting a strong university center, Vanderbilt Chancellor James H. Kirkland (1859-1939) offered the Peabody Education Fund trustees land adjacent to Vanderbilt University as a site for the new George Peabody College for Teachers.

The new George Peabody College for Teachers campus rose during 1911-14, modeled physically after Thomas Jefferson’s University of Virginia design.  Peabody’s first president, Bruce R. Payne (1874-1937), president during 1911-37, directed the building, raised additional funds, and assembled a first-rate faculty.  Classes began in the summer of 1914.

Payne’s academic cooperation with but independence from Vanderbilt control continued under George Peabody College for Teachers Presidents S. C. Garrison (d. 1944), Henry H. Hill, (1894-1987) and Felix Robb (1914-) through the 1960s. 

Building on its reputation, George Peabody College for Teachers was a distinctive mini-university.  It had its own liberal arts, music, physical education, and art departments, a library school, demonstration elementary school where teachers in training honed their skills under supervision, Knapp Farm for Rural Studies, and a nationally used Peabody School Survey Unit.  George Peabody College for Teachers produced more graduates with master’s and doctoral degrees than undergraduates and enhanced its regional and national leadership.

Post-1970 rising energy and other costs and a national recession adversely affected higher education, especially colleges of education.  George Peabody College for Teachers lost 30 faculty members during 1970-72, undergraduate enrollment dropped from 1,200 to 800 during 1972-76, and graduate enrollment also shrank. 

Despite its highly regarded past reputation, the time for a single-purpose private teachers college seemed over.  George Peabody College for Teacher’s best graduates became state university presidents, deans, leading professors, researchers, textbook authors, and public school superintendents and principals.  By strengthening lower cost public university colleges of education, its best graduates had ironically contributed to the demise of George Peabody College for Teachers.

In the 1970s George Peabody College for Teachers, lacking a large endowment, experienced financial difficulty.  Peabody’s President John Dunworth (1924-) began merger talks with Vanderbilt University officials at the end of 1978.  After an April 27,1979, agreement, George Peabody College for Teachers became Peabody College of Vanderbilt University, July 1, 1979, Vanderbilt’s ninth school.

Acting Dean Hardy C. Wilcox administered Peabody College during 1979-80.  Dean Willis D. Hawley during 1980-89 sharpened its focus, upgraded programs, added new faculty, and made it a national leader in applying computers and telecommunications to learning and teaching.  He said in 1986, “Peabody, more than any other school of education and human development, [is] national in scope and influence.”

Under Dean James Pellegrino, since 1992, the Social-Religious Building was renovated at a cost of $14.5 million into an Administrative and Technology Education Center.  Peabody installed state of the art computers, interactive video and audio, fiber optics, and satellite systems to sharpen and expand learning and teaching.  This advance is reflected in its Center for Advanced Study of Educational Leadership, Corporate Learning Center, Learning Technology Center, and over 30-year-old John F. Kennedy Center for Research on Education and Human Development.  Peabody’s various teacher education programs have annually  since 1990 been voted among the nation’s best.

In retrospect Davidson Academy, Cumberland University, and the University of Nashville spread learning and culture in what was then an isolated southwestern frontier.  By giving superior teacher training, Peabody Normal College advanced public education in a Civil War-weakened South.  George Peabody College for Teachers set a high teacher education standard regionally and nationally.

Faced with greater challenges than teachers colleges elsewhere, Peabody and its antecedents struggled, were transformed, and arose phoenix-like to produce educational leaders.  Frequently rated among the top U.S. university graduate departments of education, Peabody College of Vanderbilt University  (since 1979) still proclaims the 1852 motto George Peabody sent with his first check for his first Peabody institute: “Education, a debt due from present to future generations.”

End.

For google.com blogs of above article under—bfparker, Peabody College of Vanderbilt University—try accessing:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=bfparker%2C+Peabody+College+of+Vanderbilt+University&btnG=Google+Search

 

For a list of 153 of authors’ publications, including some on George Peabody College for Teachers,  go to: http://www.worldcat.org

type in: Franklin Parker, 1921- and you should get the following URL:

http://www.worldcat.org/search?q=Parker%2C+Franklin%2C+1921-%2C&=Search&qt=results_page

 To access free E-Book contents of Franklin Parker, George Peabody, A Biography. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 1995 rev. edn., go to:

http://books.google.com/books?id=OPIbk-ZPnF4C&dq=franklin+parker&printsec=frontcover&source=web&ots=qxV3RqTk1k&sig=sXAmDL_CyCYd-Sl0n_IRl7g1S1I#PPP1,M1

End.  Corrections, commens: bfparker@frontiernet.net

“George Peabody, “Education: A Debt Due from Present to Future Generations” (June 16, 1852); A Review with Commentary of Paul K. Conkin, Peabody College: From a Frontier Academy to the Frontiers of Teaching and Learning (Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 2002), ISBN 0-8265-1425-1. By Franklin and Betty J. Parker, bfparker@frontiernet.net

“George Peabody, “Education: A Debt Due from Present to Future Generations” (June 16, 1852); A Review with Commentary of Paul K. Conkin, Peabody College: From a Frontier Academy to the Frontiers of Teaching and Learning (Nashville, TN:  Vanderbilt University Press, 2002), ISBN 0-8265-1425-1.”

 

By Franklin and Betty J. Parker, bfparker@frontiernet.net

 

 

Peabody College of Vanderbilt University

Paul K. Conkin, Vanderbilt University’s distinguished history professor emeritus, has long gazed over the Twenty-First Avenue South, Nashville, Tennessee, divide between the campuses of Vanderbilt University and George Peabody College for Teachers.  Conkin’s book, Peabody College: From a Frontier Academy to the Frontiers of Teaching and Learning, 2002, is an important multifaceted history covering 217 years of six consecutive charter-connected educational institutions in Nashville culminating in the present Peabody College of Vanderbilt University.

 

Multifaceted History

The book is about schooling in frontier Nashville before Tennessee became a state (1796) and before and after it became the “Athens of the South.”

It is about new beginnings, examining why each of the six predecessor Peabody educational institutions was founded, how each begat its offspring, who their leading officials and teachers were, what they did right, wrong, neglected to do, and the consequences.

It is about the relationship between Peabody College’s predecessors and neighboring Vanderbilt University and the merger that occurred on July 1, 1979.

It is about the philanthropic intent of George Peabody, Massachusetts-born merchant in the South who became a London-based banker and philanthropist.

It is about his Peabody Education Fund (1867-1914); and how Peabody College became the legatee of that fund.

It is about how Peabody College as the South’s pioneer model private teacher education institution embraced George Peabody’s idealistic motto: “Education: A Debt Due from Present to Future Generations.”

It is also about Peabody College of Vanderbilt University’s continuing pursuit of George Peabody’s dream—to uplift the South and advance the nation through professionally prepared teachers serving ever-better public schools.

 

Origins

In 1779 Virginia-born and North Carolina-reared James Robertson (1742-1814) explored the western part of North Carolina which would become Tennessee.  The next year (1780) he led mainly Scotch-Irish families to the frontier settlement of Nashborough, later renamed Nashville.

Frequent Indian raids caused settler to build makeshift forts (some 50 settlers annually were killed by Indians).  From the North Carolina legislature of which he was a member James Robertson secured both a land grant and a charter for a Davidson Academy (newly named Davidson County included Nashville).  He found and persuaded Presbyterian minister Thomas Craighead (c.1750-1825) to be both church pastor and academy principal.

Thomas Craighead was a graduate of the College of New Jersey (which became Princeton University, 1896).  It was founded by “New Light” Presbyterians to train ministers.  Its President John Witherspoon (1723-94), a signer of the Declaration of Independence, inspired many of his graduates with missionary zeal to preach and teach on the frontier.

Thus, Davidson Academy and its successors (Cumberland College and the University of Nashville) were molded by Scotch-Irish Presbyterian culture, rooted in Scottish reformer John Knox’s (c.1514-72) enthusiasm for universal literacy so that all could read and understand the Bible.

 

Overview, 1785-1875

Peabody’s six predecessor schools were: Davidson Academy (during 1785-1806), under Principal Thomas Craighead who also headed for three years to 1809 its rechartered successor, Cumberland College (1806-26).

Noted educator James Priestley (1760-1821) succeeded Craighead as president of Cumberland College from October 24, 1809, to February 4, 1821.  Priestley was succeeded as president by a nationally prestigious scholar, President Philip Lindsley (1786-1850), at whose suggestion Cumberland College was rechartered as the University of Nashville from November 27, 1826, to 1875.

 

Why the University of Nashville?

There was some confusion between Cumberland College, Nashville, and a Cumberland College in Kentucky.  Adoption of the name change to the University of Nashville was hastened by the availability of a federal land grant to institutions of higher education.  There was also pride in Nashville’s growing importance.  President Lindsley envisioned a University of Nashville as an umbrella embracing professional schools and academic departments.

 

Overview, Since 1875

The University of Nashville’s (1826-1875) charter was amended in 1875 so that its Literary Department was rechartered as State Normal School (1875-89), renamed officially Peabody Normal College (1889-1911), although informally called Peabody Normal College from the first because of its Peabody Education Fund origin and financial support).  Peabody Normal College was rechartered as George Peabody College for Teachers (1914-79), which became Peabody College of Vanderbilt University on July 1, 1979.

 

Vision of an Athens of the South

Conkin wrote that by scholarly eminence and vision alone Lindsley deserved a chapter by himself, that “Philip Lindsley’s University of Nashville first justified the reputation of Nashville as a center of higher education in the South….” In 1835 Philip Lindsley first called Nashville the “Athens of the West.” It was his “Princeton of the West.” (Conkin, p. 47).

 

University of Nashville (1826-75)

Philip Lindsley was succeeded as president of the University of Nashville in 1850 by his physician son, Dr. John Berrien Lindsley (1822-97), chancellor during 1850-72, succeeded in turn by Confederate General Edmund Kirby Smith (1824-93) as chancellor during 1872-75.

 

University of Nashville’s Medical School

Financially pressed and occupied by Union troops during most of the Civil War, the University of Nashville hosted a cluster of schools and departments, some short-lived.  The most successful was its medical school from 1850 to 1895, which graduated a total of 1,699 physicians and was the second largest U.S. medical school during the Civil War.

 

Other Schools and Departments

The University of Nashville also had a law department (1854-72); a school of agriculture and mechanic arts (1872-75); a school of civil engineering (1872-75); a military institute (about 1854-59); and a preparatory school, Montgomery Bell Academy, partly endowed by wealthy Nashville iron manufacturer Montgomery Bell (1769-1855),  which still functions under the University of Nashville charter.

 

Nearly Defunct Literary Department

The University of Nashville’s Literary Department, comparable to a college of arts and sciences, did not fare well in enrollment, finances, or faculty.  From this nearly defunct Literary Department in 1875 the Peabody Education Fund trustees created and financed a State Normal School, later renamed Peabody Normal College, from which emerged George Peabody College for Teachers and finally Peabody College of Vanderbilt University (from July 1, 1979).

Conkin tells this story by describing George Peabody’s fund to aid public education in the desolate former Confederate states.

 

George Peabody (1795-1869)

A short account of Peabody’s career and philanthropic motives helps explain his motto, “Education: a debt due from present to future generations.”  This motto accompanied his July 16, 1852, letter and check founding his first library and lecture hall in his hometown (then South Danvers, renamed Peabody, Massachusetts, 1868).  That motto also helps explain the teacher education idealism of Peabody College, offspring of the Peabody Education Fund (1867-1914), whose purpose was to stimulate public schools for all as a way to help reunite and strengthen the nation.

 

George Peabody: Mass.-born Merchant in the South

Born poor in Massachusetts 19 miles from Boston, Peabody had four years of schooling and was apprenticed in a general store for four years.  In 1811 his father died in debt with the family forced out of their mortgaged home to live with relatives.  Two weeks later a great fire in Newburyport, Massachusetts, where young Peabody worked in his older brother’s store, ruined all business prospects.  These catastrophes led the17-year-old to migrate to Georgetown, D.C., where he opened a dry goods store (1812).

Peabody served in the War of 1812.  Older fellow soldier and Maryland merchant Elisha Riggs, Sr. (his son founded Riggs Bank, Washington, D.C.) took Peabody at age 19 as junior partner.  Their Baltimore-based firm successfully imported from abroad dry goods for resale to U.S. wholesalers.  Besides traveling widely in the South as a merchant, George Peabody also made five European buying trips during 1827-37.

 

U.S. Broker-Banker in London

On his fifth trip to London, February 1837, he was also an agent to sell abroad Maryland’s $8 million in bonds to finance the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal and the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad.  The Panic of 1837 soon forced Maryland and eight other U.S. states to stop paying interest on their bonds.  Foreign investors holding  these bonds, many of them pensioners and widows, were dismayed and incensed.

Peabody helped ease foreign investors anxiety by publicly urging officials in Maryland and other defaulting states to resume interest payments retroactively.  When resumption occurred and it became known that rather than burden the Maryland treasury Peabody had declined his $60,000 commission, he won public thanks from Maryland’s legislature and governor and respect among London banking circles.

To show his confidence that the defaulting states would eventually pay interest on their bonds, he privately bought many of them when their value was low. When interest payments were resumed he reaped a profit, the basis of his fortune and the source of his later philanthropy.

 

George Peabody & Co., London

Remaining in London from 1837 onward he founded George Peabody & Co. (1838-64), a London-based securities broker-banking firm, which sold state bonds to finance U.S. canals, roads, and railroads.  He bought, sold, and shipped iron and steel rails for U.S. railroads.  He helped sell the bonds that financed the Mexican War loan.  He was a director of the Atlantic Cable Co.

 

Root of the Banking Firm of J.P. Morgan

Ill and overworked, he took as partner in 1854 Boston merchant Junius Spencer Morgan (1813-90), whose son, John Pierpont Morgan, Sr. (1837-1913), began as New York City agent for George Peabody & Co.  On retirement, 1864, unmarried, without a son to carry on, George Peabody withdrew his name.  The George Peabody & Co. London firm continued as J.S. Morgan & Co., Morgan Grenfell & Co., and still continues as Deutsche Morgan Grenfell.  George Peabody was the founding root of the banking house of J.P. Morgan.

 

“Deprived as I was”

In his mid-teens when his father died in debt in 1811, Peabody supported his mother and siblings forced out of their mortgaged home to live with relatives.  Peabody restored them to the family home (1816) and paid for five of his younger relatives to attend Bradford Academy, Bradford, Massachusetts.  When his 17-year-old nephew asked his financial help to attend Yale College, Peabody replied from London (May 18, 1831), as follows (his underlinging):

 “Deprived, as I was, of the opportunity of obtaining anything more than the most common education, I am well qualified to estimate its value by the disadvantages I labour under in the society [in] which my business and situation in life frequently throws me, and willingly would I now give twenty times the expense attending a good education could I now possess it, but it is now too late for me to learn and I can only do to those who come under my care, as I could have wished circumstances had permitted others to have done by me.”

 

Peabody as Philanthropist

Peabody early told intimates privately and in 1850 said publicly that he would endow helpful institutions in every town and city where he had lived and worked.  His gifts included seven Peabody libraries in the U.S.; Peabody museums at Harvard (anthropology), Yale (paleontology) Universities, and in Salem, Massachusetts (Peabody Essex Museum: New England maritime history, Essex County history); professorships at an academy and several colleges; publication funds to two historical societies; aid to Civil War veterans, their wives and orphan children; and aid for a charitable hospital in the Vatican, Italy.

 Housing (London) and Education (Defeated Southern States)

His two largest gifts were:  $2.4 million for housing London’s working poor (begun 1862), where some 50,000 low income Londoners (white, black, others) still live in some 20,000 affordable apartments; and a $2 million Peabody Education Fund (PEF) to aid public education in the eleven embittered, impoverished, Civil War-torn former Confederate states plus W. Va. added because of its poverty.  In May 1866 Peabody went for philanthropic advice to Robert Charles Winthrop (1809-94), who helped choose the original trustees and also presided over the board of trustees.

 

Robert Charles Winthrop

Winthrop was descended from Massachusetts Bay Colony’s early governor, John Winthrop (1588-1649).  He was a Harvard graduate (1828), trained in Daniel Webster’s law office, was admitted to the bar (1831), a Whig member of the Massachusetts legislature, Speaker of the Massachusetts State House, elected to the U.S. House of Representatives (1842-50 and its speaker, 1847-50), and was appointed to fill Daniel Webster’s U.S. Senate seat (1850).  A respected national figure no longer seeking public office, Winthrop in the last 27 years of his life (during 1867-94) directed the Peabody Education Fund trustees.

 

PEF Plan and First Administrator

Winthrop pondered how to use the relatively small income from a $2 million fund to stimulate public schools for white and black children in twelve poverty-ridden, Civil War-ravaged states how to convince defeated, resentful southern parents, taxpayers, and political leaders that permanent tax supported public schools could help renew their economy and uplift their lives; how to attract and train better teachers; and how to spread public elementary and secondary schools to strengthen a new South.

 

First PEF Administrator Barnas Sears

Winthrop found a feasible plan and its able administrator in long-time friend Barnas Sears (1802-90), then president of Brown University in Rhode Island.  Barnas Sears was born in Sandisfield, Massachusetts, was a Brown University graduate (1825), studied at Newton Theological Seminary (Massachusetts), was ordained a Baptist minister, was a Colgate University (New York) professor (1831-33), studied in German universities, was Newton Theological Seminary professor and later its president.  He succeeded Horace Mann (1796-1859) as Massachusetts Board of Education secretary (during 1848-55) and was Brown University president (1855-67).

 

Winthrop and Sears, March 13, 1867

Winthrop and Sears met by chance at the old Wednesday Evening Club in Boston, March 13, 1867.  Winthrop asked Sears how the Peabody Education Fund might carry out its mission; and was impressed by Sears’s remarks.

 

Sears’s March 14, 1867 Letter

Winthrop shared with the trustees Sears’s letter of March 14, 1867, from Providence, Rhode Island, detailing how the Fund might operate.  Backed by the trustees Winthrop persuaded Sears to accept the post as the Peabody Education Fund’s first administrator during 1867-80, the crucial first 13 years.

 

Sears’s Plan

Sears’s plan was to strengthen through grants existing public schools in larger towns to serve as models for smaller communities; to establish new public schools where needed; to require that Peabody Education Fund-aided schools become permanent tax-supported public schools under state control; to require that aided schools meet nine or ten months a year; to have at least one teacher per 50 pupils; and to require local citizens to match Peabody Education Fund contributions, if possible, by two or three times the amount of Peabody Education Fund aid.

 

Matching Funds and Permanent Legislation

Sears set a rising scale of financial aid as enrollments rose: $300 a year for a school enrolling up to 100 pupils, $450 for 100 to 150 pupils, $600 for 150 to 200 pupils, $800 for 200 to 250 pupils, and $1,000 for 300 or more pupils.  It was pure pump priming, using small grants for their matching and levering effect and requiring legislative approval and permanent state support.

 

Sears’s First Aim

Sears and his family moved to Staunton, Virginia.  He wrote, spoke, and traveled widely during his 13 years as fund administrator (1867-80).  He used the fund’s limited resources to accomplish his first aim: to help establish tax supported elementary and secondary public schools and create a model teacher training college for the South in Nashville (Peabody Normal College during 1875-1911).

 

Sears’s Other Two Aims

Sears’s second aim, to establish both short term teachers’ institutes (a week or less training for practicing teachers) and long term professional teacher training normal schools, was largely accomplished by the fund’s second administrator J.L.M. Curry (1825-1903) during 1881-1903.

Sears’s third aim, rural public schools, was largely accomplished by the fund’s third administrator Wycliffe Rose (1862-1931) during 1907-14.

 

State Normal School in Nashville

Sears saw Nashville, Tennessee, as a cultural center and the ideal place for a normal school as a model for the South.  Proposals in the Tennessee legislature to establish a state teacher training normal school had failed in 1857 and 1865.  In June-July 1867, Sears offered Peabody Education Fund stipends of $1,000 or more annually if Tennessee would establish one or more normal schools.  Legislative bills for a state normal school failed in 1868, 1871, and 1873, even though the Peabody Education Fund offered (in 1873) $6,000 annually to match annual state funding.

 

University of Nashville Land and Buildings

Disappointed at not getting Tennessee legislative cooperation for a state normal school and not wanting to lose Nashville as his preferred site, Sears in 1874 asked the University of Nashville trustees to give land and buildings for a normal school in place of their moribund Literary Department.  He promised to support the normal school with $6,000 annually from the Peabody Education Fund.

 

Helped by Tennessee Governor James Davis Porter

In 1875, with the help of the then new Tennessee Governor James Davis Porter (1828-1912), Sears got the University of Nashville trustees to convert its nearly defunct Literary Department into a normal school.  The legislature, encouraged by Governor Porter, amended the University of Nashville’s charter to legalize the normal school.  Sears and the Peabody Education Fund trustees subsidized the normal school, expecting imminent and continuing state support.

 

TN State Normal School: 1875-1889

Glad not to spend state funds, the Tennessee legislature amended the University of Nashville’s charter to allow it to establish a normal school, financed by Peabody Education Fund’s $6,000 annual contribution (Sears expected sustaining state aid).  The new State Normal School on the University of Nashville campus opened December 1, 1875, with 13 students and ended the first year with 60 students.

Peabody Scholarships Provided a Southern Regional Influence

State Normal School (1875-89) was officially renamed Peabody Normal College (1889-1911), although it was always locally called Peabody Normal College.  Attendance was cost-free to selected students with promise as future teachers.  During 1877-1904, 3,645 of the most promising applicants from the South received Peabody Education Fund scholarships of $200 annually during 1877-91 and $100 annually plus railroad fare during 1891-1904.  The importance of the Peabody scholarships was that they reached beyond Tennessee to the entire South.  Alfred Leland Crabb (1883-1979, of George Peabody College for Teachers) later noted that these 3,645 Peabody scholarship teachers in their time formed an important core of educational leaders for the South.

 

Threat of a Move to Georgia

Unable or unwilling to offer state aid, the Tennessee legislature defeated appropriation bills for the State Normal School in 1877 and 1879, leaving funding solely to the Peabody Education Fund until 1881.  Disappointed, Sears and the fund trustees considered moving State Normal School from Nashville to Georgia, whose legislature agreed on state support if the fund continued its $6,000 annual contribution.  But Georgia’s Constitution required that any such school be state controlled as part of the University of Georgia at Athens.  This requirement irked Sears and the fund trustees, who wanted state aid but opposed state control.

 

Tennessee State Aid.

Threat of a move from Tennessee galvanized Nashville citizens to guarantee $6,000 by April 1880 to keep the Normal School in Nashville.  Stung into action, the Tennessee legislature gave the Normal School $10,000 annually (1881-83), raised to $13,300 annually (1883-95), and raised again to $23,000 annually (1895-1905).  Peabody Normal College got $555,730 from the Peabody Education Fund (1875-1909) and $429,000 from the Tennessee legislature (1881-1905).

 

Peabody Normal College’s Three Presidents: 1875-1909.

The three presidents of State Normal School (1875-89) and Peabody Normal College (1889-1911) were, first, President Eben Sperry Stearns (1819-87) during 1875-87.  Born in Massachusetts and Harvard University educated, Stearns, under Massachusetts Board of Education Secretary Barnas Sears, was the second president of Newton Normal School, Massachusetts (the first normal school in the U.S.).

The second president was William Harold Payne (1836-1907) during 1888-1901.  He had held the first professorship of education in the U.S. at the University of Michigan during 1879-88.

The third president was James Davis Porter during 1901-09, a Tennessean, a University of Nashville graduate (1846), a lawyer, Tennessee House member, Confederate officer, and Tennessee governor (1874-78).

 

Normal Colleges Became State Colleges of Education

The Peabody Normal College years (1875-1911) coincided with the rise of state normal schools as the chief agency to prepare elementary and secondary school teachers.  After 1910, state normal schools were increasingly replaced by state colleges of education, a changeover which coincided with the Peabody Education Fund’s dissolution in 1914.

 

Transition to George Peabody College for Teachers

George Peabody’s letter founding the Peabody Education Fund (February 7, 1867) allowed its trustees to end the trust after 30 years and to distribute its principal.  On January 29, 1903, the trustees resolved to give most of the fund’s principal to found George Peabody College for Teachers (influential trustees then included Theodore Roosevelt and John Pierpont Morgan, Sr.).

On January 24, 1905, the fund trustees committed $1 million (later raised to $1.5 million) to transform the Peabody Normal College into George Peabody College for Teachers, contingent on matching funds from Nashville, Davidson County, Tennessee, and other donors; and on relocating from south Nashville to Twenty-First Avenue near Vanderbilt University for added academic strength.

 

Transition Problems

A problem arose when Georgia State Commissioner of Education G.R. Glenn, Peabody Education Fund acting administrator in 1903, argued in his annual report that because public education in the South lagged behind national levels, the fund’s principal  should be used in a campaign to raise local public school taxes.  But fear of losing Peabody Education Fund assets led Peabody Normal College alumni to secure petitions supporting the creation of George Peabody College for Teachers in Nashville as successor to Peabody Normal College.

After a year-long deadlock on the issue, the Peabody Education Fund trustees confirmed that George Peabody College for Teachers would indeed succeed Peabody Normal College, with a new campus near Vanderbilt University.

 

Objection to Move From South Nashville

South Nashville property owners objected to moving Peabody Normal College from their area and began court action.  President James D. Porter also preferred south Nashville but the Peabody Education Fund trustees’ endowment power determined the Vanderbilt University location.  President J.D. Porter acquiesced, was compensated by a pension from the Carnegie Pension Fund, and helped secure the legislation that permitted transfer of assets from the University of Nashville’s Peabody Normal School to George Peabody College for Teachers. 

By June 1909 President Porter also helped secure funds required to match the Peabody Education Fund’s $1.5 million endowment: $250,000 from the Tennessee legislature, $200,000 from the City of Nashville, and $100,000 from Davidson County.  President Porter resigned on August 4, 1909, and George Peabody College for Teachers was incorporated on October 5, 1909.

 

Vanderbilt University

Vanderbilt University was chartered August 6, 1872, as Central University of the Methodist Episcopal Church.  In February 1873 its founder, Methodist Bishop Holland N. McTyeire (1824-89), needing building funds, visited Cornelius Vanderbilt (1794-1877) in New York City.  Their wives were cousins and had been intimate girlhood friends in Mobile, Alabama (this was Cornelius Vanderbilt’s second wife, his first wife having died).

 

Cornelius Vanderbilt’s Gifts

Bishop McTyeire told Cornelius Vanderbilt of higher education needs in the South and particularly of Central University building needs in Nashville.  Cornelius Vanderbilt, whose wealth came from ferry boats, steamship lines, and railroads (New York Central, 1867),  gave Central University in Nashville $500,000 on March 12, 1873, later doubled to $1 million, leading to the renaming of Central University to Vanderbilt University on June 6, 1873.

 

Vanderbilt-Peabody Connection

Vanderbilt University’s second Chancellor James Hampton Kirkland (1859-1939) wanted to make Nashville a great university center.  He also knew that George Peabody College for Teachers’ endowment was initially greater than Vanderbilt’s endowment.  Wanting a Vanderbilt-Peabody College connection similar to the successful Teachers College of Columbia University, Kirkland deeded Vanderbilt land to George Peabody College for Teachers, about which some contention later resulted.

 

Johns Hopkins University President Daniel Coit Gilman

Kirkland’s hoped-for ally in making a Vanderbilt-Peabody connection was Johns Hopkins University President Daniel Coit Gilman (1831-1908), the South’s most respected higher education leader and also an influential Peabody Education Fund trustee.  Kirkland urged in 1900 and 1901 that Gilman, about to retire as Johns Hopkins president, become Peabody Normal College president and help form a Vanderbilt-Peabody connection.  While retaining his long friendship with Kirkland, Gilman adroitly sidestepped involvement, declining to give a major address in Nashville in 1900 and also declining to head Peabody Normal College in its last years.

 

First Peabody College President Bruce Ryburn Payne

First President Bruce Ryburn Payne (1874-1937) during 1911-37 cooperated academically with Vanderbilt but adamantly kept Peabody independent as the South’s leading teacher training institution.

North Carolinian Bruce R. Payne was a graduate of Trinity College (later renamed Duke University), was principal of Morganton (North Carolina.) Academy, did graduate study at Trinity College and at Teachers College of Columbia University (M.A., 1903; Ph.D., 1904), was professor of philosophy and education, College of William and Mary, Virginia (1904-05); and was University of Virginia professor of secondary education and psychology and summer school organizer.

 

Architecture Inspired By Thomas Jefferson’s University of Virginia

Payne assembled a first-rate faculty, modeled the new Peabody campus on Thomas Jefferson’s University of Virginia architectural plan (a quadrangle of columned buildings dominated by a Social-Religious Building with a commanding rotunda), and raised an additional $1 million for the new campus.

 

President Payne’s Fund Raising

An example of Payne’s fund raising:  banker and Peabody Education Fund trustee J.P. Morgan, Sr., had promised $250,000 toward George Peabody College for Teachers buildings when needed but died.  Payne went to New York City to request the funds of Morgan’s son-in-law, Herbert Livingston Satterlee (1863-1947).  Satterlee hesitated because Morgan had not left written evidence of his promised aid.  Payne felt he had failed in this fund raising until Satterlee, checking with Morgan’s son (J.P. Morgan, Jr.), released the promised amount.

 

Peabody Education Fund Assets Distributed, 1914

The Peabody Education Fund trustees dissolved in 1914 and distributed their total assets ($2,324,000) as follows: $1.5 million to endow George Peabody College for Teachers; $474,000 to education departments of 14 southern universities ($40,000 each to the universities of Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Florida, Mississippi, Arkansas, and Louisiana [State]); $6,000 each to Johns Hopkins University and to the universities of South Carolina, Missouri, and Texas; $90,000 to Winthrop Normal College, South Carolina (now Winthrop College), founded by Peabody Education Fund trustee President Robert Charles Winthrop.

Recipient state universities of Georgia, Mississippi, Florida at Gainesville, North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and others named their college of education buildings after George Peabody.  There remain George Peabody-named elementary and secondary schools in the southern states his fund benefited; along with a Peabody Avenue and a Peabody Hotel, both in Memphis, Tennessee; and Peabody Hotels in Orlando, Florida, and elsewhere.

 

Peabody’s Pres. Payne and Vanderbilt’s Chancellor Kirkland

Payne, like Kirkland, was a strong administrator with a vibrant personality.  Their relations were polite but strained by Payne’s determination to keep Peabody College independent yet cooperative in cross-listing courses and programs.  Kirkland was elitist and an educational conservative while Payne, concerned for mass education, was egalitarian in the spirit of the democratic educational philosophy of his Columbia University mentor, John Dewey (1859-1952).

 

Peabody College a Unique Mini-University

Payne and his successors, rightly or wrongly, made and tried to keep Peabody a unique mini-university.  Besides the professional preparation of teachers, Peabody graduated students in liberal arts, science, music, physical education, art, and library science; and had a demonstration elementary school for teachers-in-training, Knapp farm for rural studies, and a school survey research unit used widely in the South.  Unresolved Peabody fiscal problems in the late 1960s and early 1970s led to talk of some kind of merger in the late 1970s.

 

Peabody-Vanderbilt Mutual Suspicions

With more women than men students during the 1920s-50s, Peabodians felt discrimination and a snobbish belittling of their professional education courses from Vanderbilt liberal arts professors (some of whom gladly taught for extra pay in Peabody College’s large summer school).

The Peabody community sensed that Vanderbilt wanted to separate its graduate courses from them and that Vanderbilt deans and faculty disdained Peabody’s teacher education mission and belittled its academic standards.

 

Cautious Cooperation

Vanderbilt’s short-lived Education Department (1930-34) caused apprehension at Peabody.  It was headed by Joseph Kinmount Hart (1876-1949), a progressive educator from the universities of Chicago and Wisconsin who had written A Social Interpretation of Education, 1929, and other textbooks.  Hart’s liberalism caused student disturbances.  He ended his Vanderbilt career with bitterness and vague threats of a lawsuit.

More fruitful was the Joint Universities Library (JUL), dedicated December 5-6, 1941, outgrowth of a 1935 study of library needs of adjoining campuses of Vanderbilt, Peabody, and Scarritt College for Christian Workers (Methodist college founded in 1892, later an adult education conference center).  JUL was renamed in 1984 the Jean and Alexander Heard Library.

The following overview of the Peabody presidents since Bruce R. Payne, with Conkin’s assessment of each, helps explain conditions that led to the 1979 Vanderbilt merger.

 

Presidents of George Peabody College for Teachers

Peabody’s first President Bruce R. Payne (1911-died in office, April 21, 1937) was succeeded by the following:

S. C. Garrison

Sidney Clarence Garrison (1887-1944), Peabody’s second president during 1937-44, eight years; was a North Carolinian, a graduate of Wake Forest College, a high school principal and county superintendent.  He was an M.A. degree graduate of Peabody College, 1916; served as a World War I captain; earned the Ph.D. degree from Peabody, 1919; taught educational psychology at Peabody where he was also a dean.  “Garrison was not Payne,” wrote Conkin; “he was an interim president.” (Conkin, pp. 252-253).

Henry H. Hill

President Henry Harrington Hill (1894-1987) was third president during Peabody’s boom years, 1945-60 (16 years) and interim president, 1962-63 (total of 18 years).  Also a North Carolinian, Hill received the B.A. and M.A. degrees from the University of Virginia and  the Ph.D. degree from Columbia University.  He was a teacher, principal, and school superintendent in Arkansas; an education professor and dean at the University of Kentucky; was school superintendent in Lexington, Kentucky; St. Louis, Missouri; and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Hill was cautious, moderate, and an expert at building consensus (Conkin, p. 265).  In 1951, using a foundation grant, Hill hired four high profile division chairs: 1-Harold R. W. Benjamin (1893-1969) to head Foundations of Education; 2-Willard E. Goslin (1899-1969) to head Education Administration; 3-William Van Til (1911-) to head Teaching and Curriculum; and 4-Nicholas Hobbs (1915-83) to head Guidance and Development (Hobbs later led in securing for Peabody its prestigious and well funded John F. Kennedy Center for Research on Education and Human Development.  Hobbs was later also a Vanderbilt provost).

Felix C. Robb

Felix Compton Robb (1914-97), fourth president during 1961-66, was an Alabamian, had a Vanderbilt M.A. degree, took education courses at Peabody where he became President Hill’s assistant and heir apparent, and received a Ph.D. degree from Harvard’s Graduate School of Education.  Conkin characterized Robb as charismatic and idealistic but, when cracks appeared in Peabody’s finances, “not a forceful or decisive leader” (Conkin, p. 296).

John Claunch

John M. Claunch (1906-90), fifth president from August 1, 1967, through 1973, six years, was from Louisiana, a graduate of Austin State Teachers College, Texas (B.A., 1928); and the University of Texas (M.A., 1937; Ph.D., 1956).  His main administrative experience was as director of Dallas College, an adult education mainly evening college, established by Southern Methodist University.  Stronger candidates had warily declined the Peabody presidency.  Conkin called Claunch’s appointment a “disastrous decision,” adding that he was “rigid, insecure,…authoritarian” (Conkin, pp. 311-312).

Claunch chafed at endless studies and reports to keep Peabody College afloat, clashed with Nicholas Hobbs over the Kennedy Center, opposed faculty independence, and was critical of student protests against military action in Vietnam

John Dunworth

John Dunworth (1924-) was Peabody’s sixth and last president during 1974-79, five years, when the trauma of merger was played out.  Born in Los Angeles, Dunworth was an Ed.D. graduate of the University of Southern California, had been a successful dean of Ball State University’s Teachers College, Indiana.  Conkin characterized him as “Charming, vain, an expert at self promotion…[he] worked well with faculty” and “in other times, other circumstances, might have been a popular president” (Conkin, p. 330).

 

Reviewers’ Experience at Peabody, 1951-56

[Author Franklin Parker here inserts his and wife Betty J. Parker’s experiences during 1951-56 as graduate students at George Peabody College for Teachers for any light it may shed on the Peabody College of that time].

Betty Parker and I were newly married (1950); recent graduates of Berea College, Kentucky (a tuition-free work-study college); on our first teaching jobs at what is now Ferrum College near Roanoke, Virginia.  To upgrade our teaching skills we took Peabody College courses the summer of 1951.

Peabody had a fine regional reputation in our school-oriented circles.  Betty’s aunt and other relatives had attended there.  We returned to Peabody the summer of 1952 and remained as graduate students through August 1956, four years and two summers, holding part time jobs at Peabody and at Belmont College (now University), which the Baptists had acquired from Ward Belmont School.

 

Peabody Professor Clifton Landon Hall (1898-1987)

I looked for an unexplored aspect of Tennessee higher education as a dissertation topic to pursue under Canadian-born Clifton L. Hall, a respected Peabody professor in history and philosophy of education.  Eager to be accepted as Hall’s doctoral candidate, I enrolled in Hall’s courses for several years.  Not until I took Hall’s seminars with weekly papers did I feel I had won Hall’s confidence.  Hall was a graduate of Bishop University (Quebec) and McGill University (Montreal) with a Ph.D. degree under University of North Carolina’s (Chapel Hill) history of education Professor Edgar W. Knight.

 

Peabody Dean of Instruction Felix Robb

After I passed the doctoral preliminary examinations, Dean of Instruction Felix Robb had to formalize my doctoral committee and topic.  When I met with Dean Robb in late 1953 Robb spoke at length about his own experience at Harvard Graduate School of Education.  In a Harvard seminar under historian Arthur Schlesinger, Sr. (1888-1965), Schlesinger, knowing that Robb was a rising administrator at Peabody, mentioned George Peabody’s little known role as a founder of U.S. educational philanthropy.  Schlesinger said that someone needed to explore and document that thesis.

Robb, then President Hill’s assistant, expected to rise to an executive position and chose instead to write his dissertation on education administration.  Perhaps regretting an interesting topic not pursued, perhaps out of respect for Clifton Hall (knowing I was Hall’s student), Robb urged me to look into the George Peabody topic.

 

Research Trips

Increasingly intrigued by what we found about George Peabody, we gave up our Nashville part time jobs; went on research trips to read Peabody-related papers in various libraries and depositories, summer 1954 through December 1954.  The following are samples of our findings at various depositories.

Library of Congress (LC)

LC Peabody-related papers included those of:

William Wilson Corcoran (1798-1888), friend and business associate with whom Peabody helped finance the Second Mexican War loan.

Hamilton Fish (1809-93), Peabody Education Fund trustee, New York governor, and U.S. Secretary of State involved in Peabody’s unusual 96-day transatlantic funeral. 

John Work Garrett (1820-84), Baltimore & Ohio Railroad president, who brought Peabody and Johns Hopkins together in his home near Baltimore, leading Peabody to influence Hopkins to found the Johns Hopkins University, Hospital, and Medical School.

U.S. President Andrew Johnson’s (1808-75) papers document his visit to Peabody’s rooms at the Willard’s Hotel, Washington, D.C., February 9, 1867, to thank him for the Peabody Education Fund as a national gift.

Benjamin Moran (1820-86), secretary, U.S. Legation (later Embassy) in London, wrote critically in his private journal of Peabody during 1857-69.

The Riggs family papers included those of Elisha Riggs, Sr., Peabody’s first senior partner, and Samuel Riggs (Elisha Riggs, Sr.’s, nephew), Peabody’s second partner.

National Archives

At the National Archives, Washington, D.C., we read “Veterans Records of the War of 1812″ documenting Peabody’s 14 days as a soldier.

We read “Admirals and Commodores’ Letters,” “Dispatches from United States Ministers, Great Britain,” and “Log of USS Plymouth,” each documenting Peabody’s unusual 96-day transatlantic funeral, from his November 4, 1869, death in London, to his final burial in Harmony Grove Cemetery, Salem, Massachusetts, February 8, 1870, amid much publicity.

New York City

The Pierpont Morgan Library papers of Junius S. Morgan, Peabody’s partner in London, his son John Pierpont Morgan, Sr., and grandson J.P. Morgan, Jr. (1867-1943), helped explain how Peabody, the founding root of the House of Morgan, along with a handful of other merchant bankers, early learned to marshal foreign capital to help finance U.S. industrial growth.

In Massachusetts

We read the bulk of Peabody’s personal papers and business records (then not indexed or calendared) in what is now the Peabody Essex Museum, Salem; read his papers in depositories in Peabody, Salem, Danvers, and Boston; at Harvard’s Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology; and in Yale’s Peabody Museum of Natural History.

In Baltimore

We read his papers at the Peabody Institute of Baltimore (PIB), and the papers and journals of PIB trustee John Pendleton Kennedy (1795-1870) who, told of Peabody’s intent to endow a cultural center for Baltimore, conceived of the PIB: an exceptionally rich reference library, music conservatory, art gallery, lecture hall and fund (since 1982 part of Johns Hopkins University).

We also read related material in the Johns Hopkins University Library and the Enoch Pratt Free Library (Peabody influenced both men in their philanthropies).

 

Peabody’s Died During British-U.S. Disputes Over Civil War Trent Affair and Alabama Claims

After living 32 years in England Peabody died in London on November 4, 1869, at the height of two unresolved U.S.-British disputes over U.S. Civil War incidents.

Trent Affair, 1861

In the September 1861 Trent Affair four Confederate agents seeking arms and aid in England and France slipped through a Union blockade of Charleston, S.C., sailed to Havana, Cuba, and then boarded the British mail ship Trent for England when a Union ship stopped, boarded, removed, and jailed the Confederates.

Britain rightly protested this illegal seizure.  Anticipating possible war with the U.S.,  Britain sent troops to Canada on standby alert.  Calmer heads prevailed.  President Lincoln ordered the Confederates released.  But British-U.S. angers over the Trent Affair persisted at Peabody’s death.

Alabama Claims, 1872

Confederate agents secretly bought British-built ships, armed them as Confederate raiders, like the CSS Alabama, which wrecked or sank Union ships and cost U.S. lives and vast treasure.  The U.S. offered proof that Britain knowingly turned a blind eye to the sale of these raiders, angrily sought redress, which a Geneva international court decision in 1872 required Britain to pay the U.S. $15.5 million indemnity.

 

Findings in London’s British Museum Manuscript Division, 1954

We read Prime Minister William E. Gladstone’s (1809-98) cabinet minutes of November 10, 1869.  It contained the decision, first suggested by Queen Victoria, to use Britain’s newest and largest warship, HMS Monarch, to return Peabody’s remains from England for burial in the U.S. as required in his will.

Choice of HMS Monarch as funeral ship was thus a political decision to soften near-war British-U.S. angers over these and other Civil War incidents.  Politically astute Gladstone at the November 9, 1869, Lord Mayor’s Day banquet, five days after Peabody’s death, said publicly: “With the country of Mr. Peabody we [will] not quarrel.”

 

Findings at the Guildhall Record Office

Peabody’s March 12, 1862 gift of low cost housing for London’s working poor ($2.4 million total) won public praise.  Britons marveled that an American would give that much for the working poor of a city and country not his own.

We read “Journals of the Court of Common Council” recording the Freedom of the City of London honor given to Peabody, July 10, 1862.

We also read “Minutes of the Committee for Erecting a Statue to Mr. George Peabody, 1866-1870,” listing the public contributors to Peabody’s seated statue in Threadneedle St., near London’s Royal Exchange, created by U.S.-born Rome-based sculptor William Wetmore Story (1815-95), unveiled before crowds by the Prince of Wales (later Edward VII, 1841-1910), July 23, 1869.

Statues of Americans in London

Peabody’s statue, 1869, was the first of four statues of Americans in London, the others are of Abraham Lincoln, 1920; George Washington, 1921; and Franklin Delano Roosevelt, 1948.  A replica of Peabody’s statue in London was erected in front of the PIB, April 7, 1890, by Baltimorean Robert Garrett (1847-96).

 

At the Public Record Office

We read “Alien Entry Lists” recording every time Peabody entered a British port, “Foreign Affairs Papers,” and “Admiralty Papers,” the last two documenting Britain’s part in his 96-day transatlantic funeral.

 

At Westminster Abbey

We read “Recollections by Dean [Arthur P.] Stanley of Funerals in Westminster Abbey 1865-1881.”  Visiting in Naples, Italy, when he read of Peabody’s death in London, Dean Stanley (1815-81) recalled Peabody’s gift for housing London’s working poor and telegraphed associates to offer Westminster Abbey for a funeral service for this generous American.

We read the “Funeral Fee Book 1811-1899,” which listed Peabody’s Abbey funeral costs. 

We stood at the permanent Peabody marker on the stone floor of Westminster Abbey near Britain’s unknown soldier where Peabody’s remains rested for 30 days (November 12-December 11, 1869).  This marker was refurbished for the ceremony at Westminster Abbey on February 18, 1995, honoring Peabody’s 200th birthday.

Ancient Guilds

To honor his housing gift to London’s working poor, Peabody was made an honorary member of the Clothmakers’ Company, July 2, 1862, and the Fishmongers’ Company, April 19, 1866, whose records we read in the respective guild libraries.

At the Royal Archives, Windsor Castle

Letters from Queen Victoria and her advisors to, from, and about Peabody, include her offer to him of a knighthood.  He declined because this honor required him to become a British subject.  Unwilling to give up his U.S. citizenship he accepted instead her letters of thanks and an enameled miniature portrait she commissioned to be made especially for him.  That portrait, along with his other honors, are on display at the Peabody Institute Library, Peabody, Massachusetts.

At 23 Great Winchester Street, London

Three brass signs on the front door of Morgan, Grenfell & Co., Ltd, read from bottom to top: George Peabody & Co., 1838-64; J.S. Morgan & Co., 1864-1909; and Morgan Grenfell & Co.,1909-90.  The firm’s current descendant, Deutsche Morgan Grenfell (since June 29, 1990), has records of George Peabody & Co. and some business papers of Peabody, J.S. Morgan, and J.P. Morgan, Sr. 

We also secured a copy of GP’s death certificate from London’s General Register Office, Somerset House.

At the British Library at Colindale (Newspapers)

Turning pages of heavy dusty bound newspaper volumes, we found many contemporary articles about Peabody, especially about his elaborate U.S.-British friendship dinners in or near London from 1850 onward, most often on July 4th to celebrate U.S. Independence Day.

Peabody Embossed Glassware

We wrote letters to British newspaper editors asking readers for any privately held Peabody letters or memorabilia.  Two families gave us “George Peabody” embossed glass plates made by a souvenir glassware manufacturer in Sunderland, England, in the wake of his widely publicized death and 96-day transatlantic funeral.  We donated this glassware to U.S. Peabody institutions.

London Clubs

After the Panic of 1837 forced nine of the U.S. states to stop paying interest on their state bonds sold abroad, Americans were disdained and Peabody was blackballed when nominated to London exclusive clubs.  After his 1862 London housing gift he was unanimously elected to London’s best clubs including the Athenaeum, whose librarian Eileen Stiff (d. 1985) befriended us and helped us visit a Peabody apartment complex where thousands of low income Londoners still live.

 

Return to Nashville

Back in Nashville we began to organize our voluminous Peabody materials.  This task was suddenly hastened when Peabody College President Henry H. Hill invited me to give the Peabody College Founders Day Address on February 18, 1955, the first such address by a student.

February 18, 1955

I compressed the George Peabody story into a 40 minute speech given in the then-named Social Religious Building Auditorium.  Wanting the speech published, President Hill put me in the hands of Publicity Director John Edwin Windrow (1899-1984).  Windrow  took me with him to the Peabody Library Archives to selected appropriate photos and to the printers to select print type and paper stock.

The result was a handsomely printed and illustrated pamphlet.  President Hill’s Preface read in part:  “Even in cold print [George Peabody's] life story…gives us a warm feeling of hope and courage and trust in the future.  George Peabody College for Teachers seeks to exemplify and transmit to a new generation Mr. Peabody’s vision.”

About J.E. Windrow

A Tennessee-born public high school teacher, coach, and principal, J.E. Windrow spent nearly 60 years (1923-84) as Peabody student, faculty member, and administrator under six Peabody presidents.  A longtime alumni secretary and Peabody Reflector editor, he was “Mr. Peabody” to tens of thousands of Peabody alumni whom he brought together at Peabody breakfasts at major U.S. educational association meetings.

Recently when we shared with Windrow’s niece Dr. Conkin’s view of Windrow as a conservative who adamantly defended Peabody’s autonomy and independence, she smiled wryly in agreement, quickly adding that in his last years her uncle Edwin Windrow came to see that merger with Vanderbilt had enhanced Peabody’s role in teacher education.

 

George Peabody, A Biography

Vanderbilt University Press published my George Peabody, a Biography in 1971.  On George Peabody’s 200th birthday, February 18, 1995, the Vanderbilt University Press published a revised and updated version with 12 illustrations (both 1971 and 1995 editions are out of print (but available from amazon.com as a free E-Book).  A special bicentennial issue, “The Legacy of George Peabody,” Peabody Journal of Education, Fall 1994, 210 pp., reprinted 22 of our previously published George Peabody articles.  In 1970 I received the Peabody College Distinguished Alumnus Award.  Looking back we doubt that we could have received at any other graduate school the opportunities we had at Peabody College.

[Return to events leading to merger].

 

Cooperative Peabody-Vanderbilt Program Before Merger

Vanderbilt’s Chancellor [Bennett] Harvie Branscomb (1894-1998) and Peabody President H. H. Hill cooperated in a joint two-year Master of Arts in Teaching program, funded by the Ford Foundation, 1952-55, with subject content courses taught at Vanderbilt and education courses at Peabody.  When Peabody College declined to continue, Vanderbilt added to its own small teacher certification program a special Ph.D. program to improve college teaching, with professional courses taken at Peabody College.

May 1962 Study.

A May 1962 study by visiting educator John Dale Russell (b.1895) recommended a more integrated University Center for Nashville higher education institutions but stopped short of recommending a Vanderbilt-Peabody merger.  Vanderbilt never fully embraced the plan, which was nursed along through the 1970s by a 1969 Ford Foundation grant.

In retrospect, the 1962 plan was Peabody ’s last chance to affiliate with Vanderbilt from a position of strength.  In the 1960s Vanderbilt grew in enrollment and endowment; Peabody went into slow decline.  Cooperation in courses and library facilities continued.  But changing economic conditions accentuated the two institutions’ different histories, missions, faculty and student backgrounds, experiences, and attitudes.

Vanderbilt students reflected their parents’ more affluent elitism and conservatism.  Peabody students reflected their parents’ less affluent, rural, egalitarian, and working class backgrounds.

 

Economic Downturn 1970s

The 1970s recession, inflation, rising energy and other costs caused college of education enrollments to decline nationally.  Peabody lost 30 faculty (1970-72), had unused facilities, and some Ph.D. programs faced loss of accreditation.  By 1974, Peabody reduced its music and accounting programs; eliminated some business education, home economics, and modern language programs; sold its Demonstration School; and eliminated some arts and science courses.

Peabody undergraduate enrollment dropped from 1,200 in 1972 to 800 in 1976; graduate enrollment declined to about 1,200.  Peabody officials began searching for ways to survive.

 

Merger Talks: 1978

In August 1978 Peabody’s last President Dunworth began unpublicized merger talks with Vanderbilt officials.  Not wanting to irritate already apprehensive Peabody faculty, students, and alumni, he wanted merger talks to reach resolution before Peabody interest groups organized resistance.  Dunworth wanted a strong Peabody to emerge from a merger but knew that faculty outside of education and human development would not be kept.  Somewhat of a supplicant, Dunworth held merger talks during September-December 1978 with Vanderbilt Chancellor Alexander Heard (1917-) and Vanderbilt President Emmett B. Fields (1923-).

 

Merger Options

Absorbing Peabody was less attractive to Vanderbilt officials in August 1978 than it had been during 1914-50.  Yet Vanderbilt needed Peabody’s programs in education, physical education, accounting, music education, and in some psychology areas.  Vanderbilt also needed Peabody’s cooperation in Medical Center research, student counseling, student health, band, choir, joint athletic teams, the Joint University Library, and dormitory space.

 

Hard Options

Vanderbilt’s President Fields’ thoughts on merger included scaling down Peabody College to an educational policy study center or guaranteeing the existing college of education for eight years, after which Vanderbilt could convert it to whatever purposes it wished.  Merger costs would have to come from Peabody’s endowment.  Peabody’s future earnings would have to cover its costs.  Vanderbilt would absorb Peabody’s total assets.

 

Looking Elsewhere

Faced with such hard options, Dunworth interrupted negotiations with Vanderbilt in December 1978 and talked of possible merger outside of Nashville with either Duke University of Durham, North Carolina, or George Washington University in Washington, D.C.

 

Tennessee State University (TSU)

A new factor then emerged.  Under court order in 1977 the formerly largely African American Tennessee Agricultural and Industrial University in Nashville merged with the Nashville campus of the University of Tennessee, the latter mainly an evening college for commuting students.  The resulting Tennessee State University had tried but failed to develop a doctoral program in education first with Memphis State University and then with Peabody College.

 

Talk of Peabody–TSU Union?

In January 1979, TSU representatives spoke with the Tennessee State Board of Regents (which governs state colleges) about a possible Peabody–TSU union.  Nashville citizens, many of whom saw a Vanderbilt-Peabody merger as manifest destiny, were surprised to read on February 13, 1979, of a possible Peabody-TSU connection.

Despite some racial concerns (the TSU image was of a largely African American institution), a Peabody-TSU merger was more acceptable than having Peabody College leave Nashville.  A Peabody-TSU merger was also tolerable to those who wanted a Nashville public university of lower cost than Vanderbilt.

 

Vanderbilt’s Dilemma

On March 10, 1979, the Tennessee State Board of Regents voted 11 to 1 for a Peabody-TSU connection.  Vanderbilt trustees quickly reconsidered.  A Peabody-TSU merger would mean many African American students at a state-owned Peabody College next to Vanderbilt University.  Also, a state-owned Peabody College might have to give up cooperative programs with a private Vanderbilt University. 

On March 17, 1979, Vanderbilt Chancellor Heard and Trustee Board chairman Sam M. Fleming (1909-2000) decided to offer formal terms.  These terms were presented to Peabody College trustees, March 19, 1979.  After six hours of debate, Vanderbilt’s offer was accepted.  On April 27, 1979, Vanderbilt and Peabody College trustees signed a “Memorandum of Understanding.”  On July 1, 1979, Peabody College of Vanderbilt University became Vanderbilt’s ninth school.

 

Vanderbilt’s Terms

Vanderbilt absorbed some $11 million of Peabody College’s endowment, retained over $9 million after merger expenses, and allotted $8.5 million of that $9 million for continued Peabody College support.  Peabody College of Vanderbilt University was responsible for teacher education and teacher certification programs; kept its undergraduate degree programs in elementary education, early childhood education, and a master’s program in library science (dropped in 1987); kept its Ed.D. program; offered the Ph.D. program through Vanderbilt’s Graduate School; and kept its prestigious and well funded John F. Kennedy Center for Research on Education and Human Development.

The new Peabody College of Vanderbilt University gave up its liberal arts component and ended its undergraduate degrees in physical sciences, social sciences, and human development (except educational psychology); and gave up its master’s degree programs in art education and music education.

These program changes went smoothly.

 

Faculty Settlement.

Some former Peabody College faculty who lost jobs in a scarce job market protested, voted “no confidence” in President Dunworth, and staged a symbolic march on the Peabody College of Vanderbilt’s administration building.   The 40 staff employees let go received a parting bonus of five percent of annual wage for each year of service, or up to 75 percent of their annual pay.  Many found jobs at Vanderbilt.

Non-tenured faculty received one year’s pay plus $2,000 for relocation.  Tenured faculty could either teach for a final year or receive severance pay of one year’s salary and also collect a bonus of two percent for each year of service and one percent for each remaining year until retirement.  For a few of these near retirement, this amounted to paid leave plus a sizable bonus.

Vanderbilt helped find new or temporary positions for those whose jobs were lost.

 

Backlash

The Tennessee branch of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) condemned the dismissals.  The national AAUP took no action.  In a show of solidarity, a small Vanderbilt faculty group urged Vanderbilt to retain all tenured former Peabody College faculty who, by August 24, 1979, had signed waivers (some still jobless).  By 1980, five dismissed faculty members had not found jobs.  Two untenured faculty filed grievances; one initiated legal action but settled out of court.

Most former Peabody faculty and staff, dedicated to their mission, proud of their history, and saddened by the necessity of merger, cooperated with dignity and grace.  President Dunworth resigned May 1, 1979, with undisclosed severance pay.  Peabody College’s Psychology Professor Hardy C. Wilcoxon (1921-96) was acting dean until the October 1980 appointment of new Dean Willis D. Hawley (1938-).

 

Vanderbilt’s Gain

Vanderbilt received the 1800 Peabody College students to add to its over 9,000 students.  Vanderbilt gained 58 acres, 16 major buildings, dormitory and apartment space, and a president’s home in what some called Nashville’s greatest real estate transaction.  Peabody College’s property was then valued at over $55 million.

As a gesture of good will, Vanderbilt committed $700,000 per year for ten years to Peabody College of Vanderbilt University’s operating budget.  Peabody College of Vanderbilt University student tuition costs inevitably rose by 10 percent.

Bruised by the merger, Peabody College of Vanderbilt University became, ten years later, academically stronger than ever.

 

Why Peabody Lost Its Independence

Ironically, Peabody College’s 65 years of prestigious success in training educational leaders (1914-79) contributed to its own demise.  Its own best graduates had become influential presidents, deans, leading professors, researchers, and education writers who had strengthened less expensive public colleges of education.

Wise Peabodians and others knew that the time was long past for the survival of a private single purpose teachers college like George Peabody College for Teachers, despite its history, regional reputation, and national and international influence.  Many came to see the 1979 merger as a necessary and positive step that led to a stronger, more productive Peabody College of Vanderbilt University.

 

Why Vanderbilt Acquiesced

At the merger signing, April 27, 1979, Vanderbilt Chancellor Heard said that after seven decades of cooperation Vanderbilt and Peabody needed each other, that Vanderbilt was in the business of higher education, that the precollege schooling of its entering students needed improvement.

He said that because Peabody College had the expertise to prepare better teachers, who in turn prepared better entering students, Vanderbilt needed Peabody, and that Peabody needed Vanderbilt’s strong university base.  He said that the risk each institution took in working together was worth taking because of the success both could achieve together.

 

Peabody’s Acting Dean Hardy C. Wilcoxon

Acting Dean Hardy C. Wilcoxon during 1979-80 knew that Peabody College of Vanderbilt University had to “sharpen its focus as a professional school.”  Like all Vanderbilt schools, Peabody College had to pay its own way from tuition, research grants, and fundraising.  It also had to pay its share of total plant operating costs, personnel costs, and other services.

H.C. Wilcoxon attended the University of Arkansas (B.A., 1947, and M.A., 1948) and Yale University (Ph.D., 1951), was psychology professor, University of Arkansas (to 1966), a George Peabody College for Teachers faculty member from 1966, and acting dean at the Peabody College of Vanderbilt University merger, 1979-80.

 

Peabody’s Dean Willis D. Hawley

Wilcoxon’s successor was Dean Willis David Hawley (b.1938) from October 15, 1980 to l989.  He came to Vanderbilt in August 1980 to teach political science and to direct the Center for Education and Human Development at Vanderbilt’s interdisciplinary Institute for Public Policy.  Born in San Francisco, he earned the B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. degrees in political science from the University of California, Berkeley.  He taught political science at Yale University (1969-72) and co-directed Yale’s training of secondary school teachers.  He taught political science at Duke University (1972-80) and directed its Center for Education Policy.  He was on leave from Duke (1977-78) to help plan the cabinet-level U.S. Department of Education under U.S. President Jimmy Carter.

 

Educational Technology Breakthrough

Under Dean Hawley and amid a national surge of public education reform (inspired by A Nation at Risk, 1983, and other national reports critical of public education), Peabody had by 1983-84 upgraded its undergraduate and graduate programs, added new faculty, become proficient in using computers and telecommunications to enhance teaching and learning, and moved Peabody into national leadership in applying the new educational technology to improve public school teaching and learning.  Peabody’s scattered educational technology components were placed in a Learning Technology Center to assure better research and to secure grants to improve learning and public school teaching.

 

Peabody As “America’s School of Education”

Hawley stated in 1986: “Peabody, more than any other school of education and human development, [is] national in scope and influence.”  He cited Peabody as “America’s School of Education” because “we are arguably better than anyone else at linking knowledge to practice.”  After a 1987 self-study on Peabody’s mission, Hawley wrote that “Peabody’s central mission is to enhance the social and cognitive development of children and youth,” focusing on the handicapped, and to transfer that knowledge into action through policy analysis, product development, and the design of practical models.

Peabody Library School Closed

A self-study in 1987 led Peabody to close its 60-year-old Library School.  Reasons given for its closing were: it had been understaffed, student enrollment had not grown, school librarians had become computer-based learning facilitators, and American Library Association standards would require adding faculty.  A two-day celebration in May 1987 honored Peabody’s Library School leaders and alumni.

 

Ten Years after Merger

Dean Hawley left the deanship after nine years (1980-89), remaining at Peabody.  He became University of Maryland’s education dean on July 1, 1993.  Reflecting on Peabody’s ten years as Vanderbilt’s ninth school, he said: To make it the best U.S. school of education and human development, Peabody had improved two-thirds of its programs, collaborated with Fisk University on increasing minority teachers, added new faculty, and increased its capacity to serve and influence educational policy makers and practitioners.

Peabody had established the Center for Advanced Study of Educational Leadership, the Corporate Learning Center, the Learning Technology Center, and strengthened and broadened the mission of the John F. Kennedy Center for Research on Education and Human Development.  It had increased student aid and increased external research and development funding at an annual rate of 20 percent.  In educational technology research and learning, he said, “we can claim to be the best in the country.”

In 1989 Hawley listed the following among Peabody College of Vanderbilt University’s achievements:

The U.S. Department of Education had awarded Peabody College and Harvard University a joint 5-year $2.5 million grant to study effective leadership in kindergarten through grade 12 school systems.  The grant funded a National Center for Educational Leadership, housed at both Peabody and at Harvard, to study the leadership styles of school principals and school superintendents. 

Apple Computer had donated computers, with equipment and software matched by Peabody, to improve math, science, and language arts teaching in a Nashville middle school.  Besides better middle school learning, multimedia presentations showed prospective teachers how to apply educational technology in the classroom.  Peabody was one of a six-member Southeast research university consortium testing and evaluating new educational technology programs in teaching and learning.

Peabody College received a four-year $80,000 grant for 20 educators to develop and evaluate computer-based instruction to improve learning by children with disabilities.  The 20 teachers so trained, in turn, were resource educators for other teacher education institutions, thus stimulating ongoing programs.  Said a Peabody special education professor directing the research:  “We’re on the forefront of computer-based instruction and one of the leading institutions on technology as applied to teaching children with disabilities.”

For three consecutive years, Peabody College was named as having the “top choice” program to prepare guidance counselors.  The judges (6l8 high school guidance counselors) most often named Peabody College of Vanderbilt University as having the best program for undergraduates from among 650 quality four-year colleges, public and independent, listed in Rugg’s Recommendations on the Colleges for 1990, 1991, and 1992.

 

Peabody College’s Dean J.W. Pellegrino

After a two-and-a-half year search, James William Pellegrino (1947-) was chosen as the second dean of Peabody College of Vanderbilt University, 1992-98.  He had been acting dean at the University of California, Santa Barbara, before joining Vanderbilt as holder of the Frank W. Mayborn Chair of Cognitive Studies.  “I inherited a financially stable and intellectually robust institution,” he said in the fall of 1992 (enrollment was over 1,500 [870 undergraduate, some 630 graduate students]).  His goals were to so undergird Peabody ’s instructional programs with innovative technology that they would be “uniquely superior” and set a standard for other universities.

Dean Pellegrino said Peabody was developing a college-wide blueprint to improve learning in U.S. schools.  That blueprint included continued collaboration with school leaders and teachers in Nashville and elsewhere, focusing on Peabody-developed innovative educational technology.  Besides continued collaboration after September 1992 with Nashville schools, Peabody also joined the U.S. Education Department-sponsored alliance to promote the six (later raised to eight) national education goals.

 

Social-Religious Building Remodeled

During 1993-96 Peabody’s historic Social-Religious Building was renovated and expanded by 50,000 feet at a cost of $15 million to make it Peabody’s center for educational technology research and development.  Its aim was to use creatively computers, interactive video and audio, fiber optics, and satellite systems to improve learning and enhance teaching.

The Social-Religious Building retained the main auditorium and housed Peabody’s central administrative offices, the Department of Teaching and Learning, and the Learning Technology Center.  It had built-in capabilities for multimedia presentations, productions, and conferences, and also a visitors center.

 

Dean Camilla Persson Benbow

Peabody College’s second Dean James William Pellegrino, who remained as research professor, was succeeded by third Dean Camilla Persson Benbow (b.1956) from August 1998.  She was former interim dean of Iowa State University College of Education and an authority on academically talented children. 

Under Dean Benbow, on April 30, 2000, the Social-Religious Building was renamed the Faye and Joe Wyatt Center for Education, to honor the retiring Vanderbilt University chancellor and his wife, under whom the 1993-96 building renovation occurred.

Since 1979, under deans Hawley, Pellegrino, and Benbow, Peabody College of Vanderbilt University has advanced its small but excellent teacher education and other programs, especially its educational technology; has been financially stable; has refurbished its physical plant; and has enhanced its national reputation.

 

Conkin’s Conclusions

Conkin wrote positively about the Vanderbilt-Peabody union.  He ended his book with the statement that “Peabody…has enhanced the reputation of its host [Vanderbilt].”  Conkin sees a realization of “Philip Lindsley’s 1828 dream of a great university in Nashville, with one  of its colleges dedicated to the training of teachers.”  Conkin lauds as reality “Chancellor Kirkland’s dream at the beginning of the last century of a great university center in Nashville” (Conkin, p. 409).

 

Final Thoughts

Conkin wrote a fair and balanced history of Peabody College of Vanderbilt University.  He read massive documentation, offered much detail yet also presented the big picture.  He was blunt and made judgments based on facts.  This book is a fit companion to and will stand the test of time alongside Conkin, et al. Gone With the Ivy: A Biography of Vanderbilt University (Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1985).

 

Author Conkin’s Dedication

We (reviewers) were touched, as all Peabodians will be, at Conkin’s dedication:

“I dedicate this book to the corps of Peabody-trained teachers.  From the first thirteen young women who enrolled in a new State Normal College in December 1875 to the present, thousands of women and men, teachers or prospective teachers, have come to Peabody to gain needed skills in their chosen calling.  They have eschewed wealth or the lofty status that too often attaches to high incomes.  They have left Peabody, not only well prepared to teach or to assume leadership positions in education, but with a heightened idealism and a stronger commitment to a life of service.  More than anyone else, they embody the Peabody ideal.”

 

Reviewers’ Last Word

Faced with greater financial challenges and class and race divisions than its northern and western counterparts, Peabody College and its predecessors rose phoenix-like again and again to produce educational leaders for the South, the nation, and the world.  Strengthened since 1979 as part of Vanderbilt University, and annually from the 1990s to the present voted among the best U.S. graduate schools of education, Peabody College of Vanderbilt University proudly carries into the twenty-first century George Peabody’s 1852 motto, “Education, a debt due from present to future generations.”

End

 

For blogs of above review, try to access: 1 of 2 Parts: http://bfparker.mindsay.com/1_of_2_parts_paul_k_conkin_peabody_college_from_a_frontier_academy_to_the_fro.mws 2 of 2 parts:http://bfparker.mindsay.com/2of2partspaul_kconkin_peabody_college_of_vanderbilt_univ_by_franklin_parker.mws For google.com-listed blogs by the reviewers on the above review under—bfparker, bfparker, Paul K. Conkin, Peabody College…—try accessing:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&pwst=1&ie=UTF-8&q=bfparker,+Paul+K.+Conkin,+Peabody+College…&start=20&sa=N&filter=0

 

End.  Corrections, comments: bfparker@frontiernet.net

“Thomas Philip (Tip) O’Neill, Jr. (1912-94), Congressman; Speaker, U.S. House of Representatives (1977-86).” By Franklin and Betty J. Parker, bfparker@frontiernet.net

“Thomas Philip (Tip) O’Neill, Jr. (1912-94), Congressman; Speaker, U.S. House of Representatives (1977-86).”

By Franklin and Betty J. Parker, bfparker@frontiernet.net

Review of and Commentary on: Man of the House: The Life and Political Memoirs of Speaker Tip O’Neill, by Thomas P. O’Neill, Jr., with William Novak (New York: Random House, 1987), and related sources. Given in Dialogue Form at Uplands Book Review Group, April 15, 1996.

Tip O’Neill grew up in a politically active Irish working family in North Cambridge, Massachusetts, physically near but culturally far from elite Yankee-oriented Harvard College.Growing up Irish shaped O’Neill’s political education more than did the Boston schools he attended: Gaelic school, parochial St. John’s Grammar and High School, and Jesuit-run Boston College.

On a summer job cutting Harvard lawns in June 1927, 14-year-old O’Neill watched white-linen-suited Harvard graduates under outdoor commencement tents laughing, joking, and illegally drinking champagne (prohibition was then in effect). O’Neill wrote of the incident sixty years later:

“As I watched those privileged, confident Ivy League Yankees who had everything handed to them in life, I made a resolution that someday I would make sure my own people could go to places like Harvard [for] the same opportunities that these young college men took for granted.” (O’Neill and Novak 1978)

This experience helped set O’Neill on a political career, winning eight elections to the Massachusetts House of Representatives (1936-52), becoming its minority leader (1947-48) one year and speaker the last four years (1948-52).

He then won 17 elections to the U.S. House of Representatives (1952-86, 34 years), winning John F. Kennedy’s U.S. House seat when Kennedy became U.S. Senator in 1952.

He was Democratic U.S. House Whip (1971-73), U.S. House Majority Leader, (1973-76), and U.S. House Speaker (1977-86).

As Speaker the last 10 years, he presided over the U.S. House, formed its committees and named their members, and shaped and passed important legislation. He stood third in line from the U.S presidency, after the president and vice president.

His 1987 book, Speaker of the House (this blog gives the highlights of that book), details the tumultuous half-century of his political career (1930s-80s) and pulls no punches in describing U.S. political figures and events.

Tip O’Neill’s grandfather, a refugee from the 1840s Irish potato famine, left County Cork, Ireland, 1845, for Boston, Mass. He became a bricklayer in North Cambridge, where Tip’s father, Thomas Philip O’Neill, Sr., was born. Tip’s father was also a bricklayer and a local politician who in 1900 was elected to the Cambridge City Council.

The Irish were united by poverty, Roman Catholicism, and enmity toward oppressive absentee English landlords. In Boston they opposed wealthy English Mayflower descendants living in fine homes with sons in elite schools like Groton and Harvard.

The well known jingle comparing working class Irish with English Mayflower descendants goes:

“In good old Boston townHome of the bean and the codThe Lowells talk only to the CabotsAnd the Cabots talk only to God.”

Irish warmth, friendliness, gift of gab, charisma, and storytelling talent led Tip O’Neill from boyhood toward a political career.

Job notices which read NINA (no Irish need apply) also determined O’Neill to help his own working class neighbors, especially the needy, regardless of ethnicity, religion, or color.

In turn, the Irish, French Canadians, Italians, and Jews dug the clay that made the bricks that built the fine homes of the rich Yankee English in and around Boston and that enlarged Harvard’s vine-covered buildings.

In this urban ghetto setting, politicians, young and old, rang doorbells to get out the Irish vote. Those running for office knew that to win they needed the backing of Irish ward bosses whose duty was to give patronage jobs to help the needy.

Thomas Philip O’Neill, Jr. (called Tom at home and later “Tip” by others) was born December 9, 1912, a cold winter day, while his father carried a protest sign on a freezing picket line outside Harvard College.

Harvard had hired scabs to break a bricklayer union strike for better wages and working conditions. The O’Neills and their working class neighbors proudly wore the union label.

Tip O’Neill’s mother, Rose A. (Tolan) O’Neill, died of tuberculosis when he was nine months old. A nun watched over Tip so that his father, brother, and sister could attend the funeral.

For six years a French Canadian housekeeper raised Tip. He grew up with a French accent. His father remarried. His stepmother was good to him. Knowing he had no mother, the parish priest and parochial school nuns kept an eye on him.

The nickname Tip came from Edward “Tip” O’Neill, St. Louis Brown’s baseball player of the 1880s, whose skill at hitting tip fouls drove frustrated pitchers to walk him.

The Irish loved sports, especially baseball, which they were sure the Yankees stole from an Irish game called rounders. Growing up Irish and surrounded by Revolutionary War memorials meant that, instead of playing cowboys and Indians, Tip and friends played “Down the English Yankees.”

In 1914 Tip’s father, high scorer on a civil service test, became sewer commissioner for Cambridge, enabling him to give patronage jobs to over 1,700 people and to influence private contractors.

Tip learned urban ghetto patronage politics at home, at Knights of Columbus meetings, at other Catholic organizations, while arguing ball games in bars and in political clubs where card-playing, beer drinking, and political talk went hand in hand.

In his teens and into his twenties Tip hung out at Barry’s Place, later called Barry’s Corner, named after the Barry family who lived in a two-story building, 149 Ridgley Avenue, North Cambridge, where Rice, Cedar, and Middlesex streets converged.

When the ground floor barbershop became vacant, Tip and friends pitched in 50 cents each to rent what became their lifelong club. Dave Barry, living upstairs, a Boston Globe sportswriter, sparked much figuring of baseball batting averages, dividing times at bat into number of hits.

Practicing quick mental arithmetic stood Tip in good stead later as a quick vote counter in the state legislature and the U.S. House of Representatives. Early Barry’s Corner regulars were mainly Irish, some French Canadians, one black member, and Jewish member Lenny Lamkin, who later managed Tip’s congressional district office.

After the building was sold and torn down for apartments, Barry’s Corner regulars met each June at the Veterans of Foreign Wars on Massachusetts Avenue. (Buckley 1994)

Tip lived by rules his father taught him: always remember his roots, live a clean and honest life, show loyalty and reciprocity, fulfill responsibilities (you are your brother’s keeper), share life’s necessities with those in need, and resolve differences by compromise.

Tip heard much of the patronage politics of John F. (Honey Fitz) Fitzgerald, Boston’s first Irish mayor, whose daughter Rose was John F. Kennedy’s mother.

But Tip’s practical political mentor was James Michael (Jim) Curley, three times Boston mayor and one-term Mass. governor. Jim Curley was to most a wily machine politician; to others a Robin Hood benefactor, the model for novelist Edwin O’Connor’s novel, The Last Hurrah, made into a popular John Ford-directed film in 1958, starring Spencer Tracy.

At age 16, still in school, O’Neill rang doorbells to get out the vote for New York Governor Al Smith’s 1928 run for the presidency. O’Neill was popular with peers and teachers, active in sports, but an average student.

On graduating from St. John’s High School in 1931, he drove a brick company truck for a time. At age 20, in 1932, he helped get out the vote for presidential candidate Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR). At the urging of his parish priest and his teacher, Sister Agatha, he entered Boston College in 1933. The Boston College yearbook for 1936 listed him as age 23, 6’ 2”, weight 215 pounds.

In 1934, a college sophomore, he visited relatives in Washington, D.C. Missy LeHand, FDR’s secretary, was from Tip’s neighborhood in North Cambridge. She had earlier told him, “If you ever come to Washington, give me a call at the White House.” He called. She invited him to the White House, met him at the gate, and asked, “Would you like to meet the president?”

O’Neill later wrote, “I was speechless. Franklin Delano Roosevelt was like God to me.” They met. Awe mixed with shock when O’Neill spoke to the wheel-chair bound president. That meeting also helped determine Tip on a political career to help have-nots. (O’Neill and Novak 1987)

Still in college and living at home in Cambridge, he ran for and lost by 150 votes election as North Cambridge city councilman, his only political defeat. Before the vote he was surprised when longtime neighbor Mrs. O’Brien said: Tom (he was called Tom at home), I will vote for you, even though you did not ask for my support.

Stunned, O’Neill said, “Mrs. O’Brien, I have lived across the street from you for 18 years, have cut your grass summers and shoveled snow from your walks winters. I didn’t think I needed to ask for your vote. Mrs. O’Brien said, “Let me tell you something, Tom–people like to be asked.”

O’Neill took this lesson to heart, the origin of his oft-repeated maxim: “All politics is local.” Tip learned early that a politician serves at the pleasure of his constituents; that voters have names, faces, minds, and opinions; that they have problems they want your help on; and that they expect you to ask for their vote. (Editorial 1995, Nolan 1994)

At age 24 in 1936, just out of college, he won election to the Massachusetts House of Representatives, where he served eight terms (to 1952).

The same Sister Agatha who got him to enter Boston College had earlier introduced him to longtime sweetheart Mildred Ann (Millie) Miller, a grade behind him at St. John’s School and the daughter of a Boston elevated trainman. They were married in June 1941. She never dreamed she was marrying a lifelong politician.

They had five children. Tip’s autobiography is dedicated: “For Millie, the Speaker of My House, a loving wife and mother [of five], and my partner through so many triumphs and trials.”The Massachusetts Legislature

In eight tough elections to the Massachusetts House of Representatives, O’Neill emulated his father’s and Jim Curley’s service to constituents, while avoiding Curley’s corrupt methods.

O’Neill liked the social part of campaigning, ringing doorbells and meeting people. He was pleased when constituents told him they had voted for him because his father had helped one of their relatives when in need.

Republicans had dominated the Massachusetts legislature for over a hundred years. O’Neill began as one of 62 Democrats outnumbered by 178 Republicans. Most Republicans were Yankee Protestants from Boston’s financial institutions and strongly pro-big business.

Outnumbered, Democrats like O’Neill could do little to initiate new legislation but spent their time getting patronage jobs for their constituents. He helped many youngsters enter college by finding them summer jobs. He got their fathers New Deal public works jobs.

As a Mass. House member, he regularly received 50 snow buttons for constituents for snow removal jobs at $3 to $4 a day. After a snow storm, the poor and jobless lined up outside his home for the snow removal jobs that put bread on their tables.

His first bill to become law removed license fees for youngsters selling newspapers and magazines. As a boy he had sold The Saturday Evening Post for pocket money.

In 1937 he opposed a loyalty oath bill, an unpopular position to take since his constituents, especially veterans, were patriots. But his independent stand marked him as a man of principle and a potential leader. In 1947 he became Mass. House minority leader.

That year, Republican Governor Robert F. Bradford called O’Neill to his office and said: Mayor Jim Curley has been found guilty of mail fraud and is going to federal prison. If I remove him as mayor, the Irish will say I am a bigot. If I let him be mayor again after his jail term, Republicans won’t reelect me. I want to name City Clerk John Hynes as acting mayor until Curley gets out of prison. Will you ask Hynes if he will serve with that understanding?

O’Neill went to Hynes, who said: if I take Curley’s job, my city council bosses will take my clerkship job from me. Tell the governor I will fill in for Curley as mayor only if I am guaranteed return of my clerk’s job. The recommendation went in that way.

Curley was in jail five months until U.S. Representatives John McCormack got President Harry S Truman to pardon Curley. Years later, when O’Neill told Curley of his part in the affair, Curley asked: you did that? I always thought it was my lawyers, so I sent them clients who must have earned them a million dollars.

In 1948 O’Neill was called to the Boston district office of U.S. Representative John McCormack, then U.S. House Minority Whip and the most influential Democrat in New England. McCormack said: If you take the lead in doing the necessary leg work, I can raise the money needed to win a Democratic majority in the Massachusetts House.

Armed with campaign funds, O’Neill and aide, Tommy Mullen, went to Republican districts, identified the most popular Democrat, usually a lawyer back from World War II, and offered to pay his campaign costs if he would run as a Democrat for the Massachusetts House. The result of the massive statewide effort won the Democrats 120 seats over 118 Republican seats, a bare majority that reversed a hundred years of Republican rule. (Woodlief 1994)

O’Neill rose rapidly in the Mass. state House. His Democratic peers elected him Minority Leader in 1947 and Speaker in 1948. He pushed through many “little New Deal” bills.

When a neighbor with two children with Downs syndrome told of having to lock them out of sight because of inadequate state facilities, O’Neill launched a campaign that made Massachusetts mental health services the best in the nation. He helped double teacher salaries and gained benefits for veterans and the elderly.

Boston’s Mayor Curley took Tip under his wing, giving him poems to memorize, books to read, and tips on how to make great speeches. O’Neill reciprocated in 1952, his last year as Massachusetts House speaker, by pushing through a pension bill for Curley, then old and in need.John F. Kennedy

In 1946, O’Neill then 34, first met John F. Kennedy, then age 28, skinny and bashful, still recovering from World War II wounds received while commanding a PT boat in the Pacific. Although backed by his rich father, Joseph P. Kennedy, with high political ambitions for his sons, John F. Kennedy seemed to local politicians then, including O’Neill, unlikely to go far.

Some said jokingly that young Kennedy had thrown his diaper into the ring but didn’t stand a chance. “But,” O’Neill later wrote, “he grew [in experience] like nobody I’ve ever known, and he went on to become one of the great political leaders of our time.”

Initially J.F.Kennedy (JFK) considered running as Mass. lieutenant governor, but his father decided instead that he should run for the U.S. House of Representatives. O’Neill was then running for his sixth term in the Mass. legislature.

Joseph P. Kennedy’s cousin, Joe Kane, managed John F. JFK’s campaign, stressed young Kennedy’s war record, and got writer John Hersey, Pulitzer Prize winner for his novel, A Bell for Adano, to write of Kennedy’s PT boat heroism.

Hersey’s article appeared as “Survival” in The New Yorker, was reprinted in Reader’s Digest, and flooded the Massachusetts district Kennedy wanted to represenThat article plus the Joe Kane-run campaign plus father Joseph P. Kennedy’s $300,000 won young John F. Kennedy his U.S. House seat.

O’Neill was in a bind. Kennedy’s competitor for the U.S. House seat was Mike Neville, O’Neill’s Mass. House colleague who had come up through the Cambridge city council. Kennedy asked O’Neill repeatedly to back him, but O’Neill said he had to remain loyal to Mike Neville.

After Kennedy won, he told O’Neill: I thought I could win you over, but I was wrong. You stuck with your buddy, Mike Neville. You are a man of your word. Next time I run, I want you on my side. Kennedy, like O’Neill, valued loyalty.

It was John F. Kennedy who helped O’Neill get from the Massachusetts House to the U.S. House of Representatives. In January 1951, JFK confided to O’Neill that he (Kennedy) would run the next year either for the Massachusetts governorship or for the U.S. Senate. He wanted O’Neill to know that if O’Neill wanted to run for Kennedy’s U.S. House seat, he had a year to get ready. O’Neill, definitely interested, won that seat, kept it for 34 years, and through it became a national figure.

Robert F. Kennedy

As a U.S. House member, O’Neill could name four delegates to the 1956 Democratic National Convention. Asking O’Neill to let his brother Robert F. Kennedy be one of those delegates, John F. Kennedy said:. Bobby is brilliant. I want him to work for me at the convention in case lightning strikes and I’m asked to be Adlai Stevenson’s vice presidential nominee.

O’Neill, who had already chosen three Massachusetts delegates, gave up his own delegate seat to accommodate Robert F. Kennedy. Robert showed no gratitude. O’Neill mentioned this incident to father Joseph P. Kennedy, who said: don’t expect appreciation from my boys. They’ve had so much done for them that they expect such things. Jack is soft and forgiving, but when “Bobby hates you, you stay hated.”

O’Neill heard in the late 1950s that Robert F. Kennedy planned to run for his (O’Neill’s) House seat. A concerned O’Neill asked John F. Kennedy about this threat. After checking with father Joseph P. Kennedy, John F. Kennedy reported his father as saying, “Bobby will not be a candidate in Tip O’Neill’s district…. Tip is a friend of the family.”

Years later, a Newsweek writer told O’Neill that in 1968 on a plane to Los Angeles, presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy asked the writer how he knew so much about Congress. The writer said: I get my information from Tip O’Neill, “the sharpest guy on the Hill.” Robert said, “Tip and I have never been friendly, but when I get back from this trip I’m going to look him up.”

Within days of that conversation Robert F. Kennedy was assassinated.

O’Neill had political guile but held little rancor. Before O’Neill retired
in 1986, the slain Robert F. Kennedy’s son, Joseph P. Kennedy, 2nd, asked and received O’Neill’s blessing to run in his district for his U.S. House seat. O’Neill’s second maxim after “All politics is local,” was “Yesterday’s enemies are tomorrow’s friends.”

When John F. Kennedy became president in 1960, his U.S. Senate seat was held by his Harvard roommate until 1962, when Ted Kennedy, then age 30, won that same Senate seat. Two years later, 1964, Robert F. Kennedy won election to the Senate from New York.

Patriarch Joseph P. Kennedy planned and paid for these moves, including John F. Kennedy’s 1960 successful run for the presidency.

Lyndon B. Johnson as John F. Kennedy’s Vice President

O’Neill helped get Lyndon B. Johnson to run as John F. Kennedy’s vice presidential candidate. At the 1960 Democratic convention, O’Neill early saw that Kennedy would win on the first ballot. He so reported to key politicians. Present was U.S. House majority leader John McCormack, who said to Johnson’s mentor, Sam Rayburn: Tip says Kennedy will get the nomination on the first ballot.

Texas Congressman Pat Wright, also present, said to Rayburn: if Kennedy wants Lyndon as his running mate, Lyndon cannot decline. Rayburn, hitherto adamant that Johnson accept only the top spot, told O’Neill: tell Kennedy that if he wants Lyndon, to call me. I’ll get Lyndon to accept.

O’Neill reported all this to Kennedy, who said: I need Lyndon to win the national election. But I was afraid he would turn me down. Because of what you say, I’ll call Rayburn. If he tells me Lyndon will accept, I’ll make the offer.

Lyndon B. Johnson still hesitated. The younger, less experienced John F. Kennedy had been his main opponent for the presidential nomination. To win Lyndon Johnson over, Kennedy told O’Neill: bring Lyndon to Boston to give a major speech. Get out the crowds for him. Make Lyndon happy.

O’Neill got labor union members and students to attend, bands to play, and brought Lyndon Johnson to the Boston meeting just as crowds poured from office buildings. A mounted police officer directing traffic got off his horse to let Lyndon climb on. Waving a ten gallon hat, Lyndon made the horse rear back. The crowd went wild. Lyndon signed on as Kennedy’s vice presidential candidate. The rest is history.

The John F. Kennedy Presidency

Sam Rayburn, Tip O’Neill, and others struggled to get President John F. Kennedy’s bills through the House, but Kennedy’s aides were inept at working with Congress. O’Neill himself broke ranks on Kennedy’s federal aid to education bill.

President Kennedy felt he had to bend backward to please those adamant about separation of church and state. O’Neill, irritated because parochial schools were denied federal funds despite using the same textbooks as the public schools, voted against the bill which, as it happened, never came out of the Rules Committee. Still, Kennedy held no hard feelings.

When Kennedy’s aides threatened to replace House Speaker John McCormack, Tip O’Neill brokered a reconciliation.

Another difficulty occurred in 1961 when Kennedy asked O’Neill to help Ted Kennedy become the Democratic nominee as U.S. Senator from Massachusetts.

Ted Kennedy’s Democratic opponent was John McCormack’s nephew. Tip O’Neill’s intervention helped ease the Kennedy-McCormack tension when Ted Kennedy won the Democratic nomination and defeated his Republican rival, Henry Cabot Lodge’s son.

Tip O’Neill was proud of John F. Kennedy’s presidential style; courageous handling of the October 1962 Cuban missile crisis; and achievements in civil rights, space exploration, and arms control. O’Neill knew Kennedy to be skeptical about the military and believed Kennedy would have pulled us out of Vietnam if he had lived to win a second term.

O’Neill and Kennedy talked about the November 1963 Dallas trip. O’Neill asked Kennedy: why spend your time and energy patching up the Connelly-Yarborough conflict in Texas?

Stunned by John F. Kennedy’s assassination, O’Neill discounted conspiracy theories. But five years later, he heard Kennedy intimates Kenny O’Donnell and Dave Powers say they were sure they heard two shots from behind the fence on the grassy knoll.

O’Neill said: that’s not what you told the Warren Commission. They replied: we testified that way to avoid more pain for the family. After that, O’Neill was skeptical about the Warren Commission findings.

But O’Neill preferred to remember how he and the nation were thrilled by John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address (”Ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country”). O’Neill admired Kennedy and Jackie’s glamour, the talented people they brought to the White House, and their making Americans feel that this country had a place for everybody, regardless of race and religion.

U.S. Pres. Lyndon B. Johnson and Vietnam

In early August 1964 two U.S. warships on intelligence patrol in the Gulf of Tonkin near North Vietnam were allegedly fired upon. President Johnson asked Congress for approval to take “all necessary measures” to halt Communist aggression in Southeast Asia.

O’Neill hesitated to sign the Tonkin resolution. He confided to House Speaker John McCormack his suspicion that the military wanted to use the Tonkin incident for all out war. He told McCormack he was thinking of voting against the resolution. McCormack advised him not to vote against Tonkin. It will make you seem to be a traitor to your country.

Politically, McCormack was right, but O’Neill felt that his vote for Tonkin was the worst vote of his 34 years in the House. The House supported the resolution 414 to 0, the Senate 88 to 2, including support by Arkansas Senator J. William Fulbright, who later changed his mind and was Pres. Johnson’s most powerful opponent on the war.

O’Neill, whose congressional district had 22 colleges and universities, including Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, was often asked to speak about the war. Protesters challenged his hawkish views. His home was picketed by war protesters, once by activist actress Jane Fonda.

Challenged when he spoke at Boston College, his alma mater, where two of his children who were then students. O’Neill told protesters: I think I know more than you do. I’ve been briefed by Defense Secretary Robert McNamara, General William Westmoreland, Secretary of State Dean Rusk, and the CIA.

A student then asked O’Neill: have you ever once been briefed by the other side? O’Neill was taken aback. The more he thought about it, the more he sought out dissenting views. Marine General David Shoup, who retired rather than go public with his dissent, told O’Neill that the U.S. was sending American boys to die in a war it could not win. Americans would simply not tolerate bombing North Vietnam to oblivion.

O’Neill was told that hawkish advisors were keeping these and other dissenting views from President Johnson.

In June 1967 the O’Neills visited their daughter, a foreign service staff officer in Malta, a rest and recreation place for American military from Vietnam. O’Neill asked their opinion. He was told that the Vietnam War was not winnable, that it was only wasting American lives and resources.

Deciding to go public, O’Neill told his Massachusetts constituents in a September 1967 newsletter: I now see the Vietnam conflict as a civil war in which U.S. involvement is wrong. Parents in his district with sons in Vietnam pilloried him. Tip O’Neill’ wife Millie was berated.

A livid President Johnson confronted O’Neill in the White House: “What kind of an SOB are you?” O’Neill told Johnson of his many talks with dissidents and of his gradual conviction that the war was unwinnable unless North Vietnam was bombed to extinction, something the American people would never countenance.

Johnson said: No, I can’t bomb North Vietnam to extinction. It would mean a third world war involving the USSR and China. Johnson put his arm around O’Neill and said: Tip, I see now that your changed view is a matter of conscience. Don’t talk to the press. Give me time. I will read the anti-war reports, as you suggest.

O’Neill’s now-dovish views became known. Anti-war groups asked his advice. He suggested that they influence families of soldiers in Vietnam to urge their Congressmen to break with the Administration’s war policy. On March 31, 1968, an almost broken Pres. LBJ announced that he would not seek nor run for the presidency for a second term.

O’Neill played another little known part in ending the Vietnam War. House votes on bills were public record. But votes on amendments to bills, counted by unrecorded teller voting, were not publicly known. O’Neill tried but failed in the early 1960s to put an end to this unrecorded teller voting.

Now, with Vietnam frequently on the agenda, Common Cause and other groups wanted the public to know of growing House member anti-war votes on amen

“Arthur Miller 1915-2005: Making of a Playwright, A Dialogue.” By Franklin & Betty J. Parker, bfparker@frontiernet.net

“Arthur Miller 1915-2005: Making of a Playwright, A Dialogue.”

By Franklin & Betty J. Parker, bfparker@frontiernet.net

Based on Arthur Miller, Timebends, A Life, 1987; Martin Gottfried, Arthur Miller, 2003; and Related Works.

 

BJP:  Frank, why is Arthur Miller worth our time?

 

 FP:  He is among the world’s most influential living playwrights.

 

BJP:  Why such praise?

 

FP:  His plays and other writings have universal appeal.  His plays about family conflicts reflect our times of trouble from the 1930s Depression onward.  Because his writings are large our coverage must be selective.

 

BJP:  His four Jewish grandparents and his father Isadore Miller emigrated to New York City (NYC) from a village in Poland.

 

FP:  His mother, Augustus Barnett, American born and a high school graduate, read books and saw plays.  She married Isadore Miller.  He arrived in NYC at age six, was unschooled, worked at a sewing machine, and ultimately became president of Miltex Coat and Suit Co.  The Millers lived well atop a 6-story apartment building on West 110th Street, facing Central Park.

 

BJP:  Arthur Miller, born October 17, 1915, had a brother Kermit, 3 years older, and a younger sister Joan.  The Millers were not strictly observant Jews, yet Jewishness permeated their lives.  Arthur was an indifferent student.  He preferred sports and bike riding.  He grew lanky and tall, like his father.

 

FP:  The stock market crashed on October 24, 1929.  Arthur was 14.  The bankrupt family had to move to cheaper housing near relatives in Brooklyn.  Arthur’s father often sat home dazed.  Brother Kermit dropped out of New York University.  Arthur, a Brooklyn high schooler, heard family arguments over their fallen status.

 

BJP:  Before school Arthur delivered baked goods, worked after school and Saturdays in an auto supply store, and drove its delivery truck.  His plays reflect Depression-era strains and family conflicts.

 

FP:  He graduated from high school in June 1933.  Poor grades kept him from entering low cost City College of New York.  He applied for a stock clerk job at a large Manhattan auto parts warehouse.  When no response came from his application, he phoned his former auto parts employer, who explained:

 

“They are Irish Catholic and have not replied because you are Jewish.  I will phone and tell the manager that you know more about auto parts than anyone else they are likely to hire.”

 

BJP:  Arthur, the only Jew at the auto parts warehouse, striving to fit in, felt the anti-Semitism. His later one act play, A Memory of Two Mondays (1955), captures the idiom, life style, and prejudices of his warehouse colleagues.

 

FP:  His coworkers lived drab lives, had dead-end jobs, with many mouths to feed, and were resigned to drudgery for bare survival.  But Arthur read books on the subway and at lunch breaks, and he had hopes and aspirations.

 

BJP:  Planning for college, Arthur saved $12 of his $15 earnings per week.  Hearing that the University of Michigan had low tuition, he applied, was turned down, not because of anti-Semitism but because of poor high school grades. 

 

FP:  He worked, saved, and wrote again to the admissions dean: “I am more mature now, work full time, study at night, save for college, and I ask to be admitted.”  The letter worked.  He was admitted.

 

BJP:  At 19 in early September 1934 he arrived by bus in Ann Arbor to find his place and follow his star.

 

FP:  Studying hard at the University of Michigan, Arthur held part time jobs, joined campus debates, and wrote for the campus newspaper, the Michigan Daily.

 

BJP:  His girl friend, coed Mary Slattery from Lakewood, Ohio, a lapsed Catholic, shared his leftist socio-political views.  Needing money, he had his eye on the university’s $250 Hopwood prize for the best undergraduate writing.  University of Michigan graduate Avery Hopwood, a successful Broadway playwright, funded the prize.

 

 FP:  In six days and nights on 120 typed pages in play form, about which he knew little, he finished and submitted No Villain, a play about his family’s fall from affluence to near poverty.  It won the 1936 Hopwood prize.

 

BJP:  Encouraged by his mentor, playwriting Professor Richard Rowe, Arthur revised No Villain.  Retitled They Too Arise, it won an award from the prestigious NYC Theater Group’s Bureau of New Plays.  They Too Arise was staged in Ann Arbor and Detroit.

 

FP:  In 1938, his senior year, he won his second $250 Hopwood Award for his play, Honors at Dawn. Graduating in June 1938, still Depression time, he worked in the Federal Theater Project writing radio plays.

 

BJP:  He later made a living of sorts writing radio scripts for DuPont’s Cavalcade of America and other radio series.  In 1940 he married Mary Grace Slattery.  Her work for a book publisher helped support them.

 

FP:  When Pearl Harbor was attacked on Dec. 7, 1941, Miller was 26.  His brother Kermit became an infantry officer.  Arthur volunteered but was rejected because of a knee injury.  He chose to do heavy war work in the Brooklyn Navy Yard repairing damaged war ships.

 

BJP:  Because movie scripts were team written, Miller turned down Hollywood invitations.  An exception was his original screenplay for The Story of G.I. Joe, 1945, about beloved WWII war correspondent Ernie Pyle.  But Miller never listed it among his works because other writers had altered his screenplay.

 

FP:  Miller wanted his own successful hit.  No one would publish his novel, The Man Who Had All the Luck, 1941.  He revised it as a play.  It closed after four NYC performances .

 

 BJP:  Disappointed, Miller wrote a friend that he might never write another play:  “This is now my fifth or sixth play, and I seem to have gotten nowhere.”  But Miller persisted.  In 1947 his play, All My Sons, became a Broadway hit.

 

FP:  That play, All My Sons, is based on an incident told him by his mother-in-law, Mrs. Julia Slattery.  It was about an Ohio girl who reported her father for selling defective airplane parts to the Air Force.  All My Sons opened January 29, 1947, in NYC.  Here is the plot and flavor of All My Sons.

 

BJP:  Act 1:  A few years after WWII.  The backyard of a comfortable suburban Ohio home owned by 60-ish Joe Keller and his wife Kate Keller.  Their son Larry, an Air Force pilot, declared missing in action for the past 3 years, is believed dead by all but his mother.

 

FP:  Mrs. Keller wants to believe that Larry is alive, will return, and will marry his next door sweetheart Ann Deever.  Ann Deever and her brother George left town in shame after their father was convicted and jailed as a war profiteer.

 

BJP: Chris Keller, the second Keller son, has returned safely from WWII.  He believes his pilot brother Larry is dead.  Chris also loves Ann Deever.  He has invited her to the Keller home to ask her to marry him.

 

FP:  Ann Deever arrives.  Her father, Steve Deever, was Joe Keller’s partner in a factory with a WWII contract to make cylinder heads for Air Force P 40 fighter aircraft engines.

 

BJP:  One day 120 cracked cylinder heads were shipped.  They caused 21 U.S. pilots to die.  An investigation cleared Joe Keller, home sick on shipment day. 

 

FP:  Steve Deever claimed that Joe Keller phoned him from the Keller home.  Keller was afraid the Air Force would cancel their contract for non-shipment.  Joe Keller urged Deever to weld the cracks and ship the cylinder heads.

 

BJP:  Joe Keller then assured Deever that an inspector would surely spot the welded cracks and junk the cylinders.

 

 FP:  Because no record of Joe Keller’s phone call could be found, Keller was cleared, Deever was found guilty and imprisoned.

 

BJP:  Ann Deever’s brother, George Deever, phones her at the Keller home.  He says to her:  “Don’t marry Chris Keller.  I talked to our father in prison.  He confirmed Joe Keller’s guilt.  I’m coming to take you from that evil house.”  Curtain.

 

FP: Act 2.  A distraught and angry George Deever arrives.  Joe Keller glibly tells George Deever:  “When your father is released from prison, there will be a job waiting for him.”  George Deever explodes:  “He hates your guts.  Don’t you know that?  He’s a broken, a sick man.”

 

BJP:  Joe Keller says:  “Oh.  I’m sorry he’s sick.  Me, I don’t have time to get sick.”  Mrs. Keller unthinkingly adds:  Joe hasn’t been sick in 15 years.  George Deever freezes.  Realizing her mistake, Mrs. Keller quickly adds:  “Except for that flu.  It slipped my mind.  That flu that kept him in bed on shipment day.”

 

FP:  Shocked at her admission, Mrs. Keller says to George Deever:  “Don’t look at me that way.  Joe wanted to go to the shop that day but he just could not lift himself out of bed.”

 

BJP:  Dialogue now tense, quick.  George Deever to his sister Ann:  “We must leave this evil house.”  Chris Keller to Ann:  “I love you, Ann.”  Mrs. Keller to her son Chris:  “You can’t marry Ann Deever.  She’s Larry’s girl.  Larry’s coming back.”

 

FP:  Chris to his mother:  “Larry’s dead and I am marrying his girl.”  His mother cries, “Never! Never!”  Joe Keller to his wife:  “Larry’s dead, for Christ sake.  For three years you’ve been talking like a maniac.”  Mrs. Keller slaps her husband’s face.   Shocked silence. 

 

BJP:  Chris to his mother:  “I’ve accepted Larry’s death.  Why can’t you?”  Mother Keller, hysterically, to Chris:  “Your brother is alive.  Because if he’s dead, your father killed him.  Do you understand me now?”  Shocked silence again.

 

FP:  Joe Keller, dazed, says:  “Me?  Kill?  Larry never flew P 40s.  I’m in business.  One hundred and twenty cracked cylinders, you’re out of business.  They tear up your contract.  You put 40 years into a business and they knock you out in a minute.  I swear to God I never thought they’d install those cylinders.”  Turning to Chris:  “It was a chance I took…for you…  so you…could take over… a thriving business.”

 

BJP:  Chris, livid, says:  “For me!  You were killing our boys and you did it for me?  Is business all you know?  Don’t you have a country?  Don’t you live in the world?  No animal kills its own.  What must I do?” Curtain.

 

FP: Act III.  Mrs. Keller sits dazed in a lawn chair.  Joe Keller, head bent, comes out of the house.  Mrs. Keller tells him coldly, “Joe, this thing is not over yet.  Confess to Chris.  Offer to go to prison.  Maybe he’ll forgive you.”  Joe Keller mumbles:  You wanted money, so I made money.  Must I be forgiven for that?

 

BJP:  Ann and Chris come from the house.  Ann calmly tells Joe Keller and Mrs. Keller: “I have known for a long time that Larry is dead.  He sent me this letter the day he died.”  Chris takes Larry’s letter and reads it aloud:  “Dear Ann, Yesterday they flew in newspapers from the States.  I read about our fathers being tried and your father being convicted.  I can’t bear to live any more.  I am going out on a mission.  They will probably report me missing.  You mustn’t wait for me.  If I had my father here now, I could kill him.”

 

FP:  Silence broken by Joe Keller who says hoarsely :  “Those 21 P-40 pilots who were killed.  My own son who killed himself….   He was my son.  They were all… my sons.”  He stands, jaw set, whispers: “I have a price to pay.”  Grimly, he strides into the house. 

 

BJP:  Mrs. Keller shakes her head and says:  “He won’t last long in prison.” 

 

FP:  Silence, broken by…[bang]…gunshot…from the house.  In horror they realize…Joe’s killed himself.

 

BJP:  (Fast).  Ann goes to Chris.  They cry… rock back and forth.
FP: Mother Keller slowly rises, embraces Ann and Chris; tells them:  “It’s over.  Forget now.  Wipe your tears.  Cry no more .”  Curtain.  End of Play.

 

BJP:  All My Sons ran 328 performances, received rave reviews, won the New York Drama Critics’ Circle Award, the Donaldson Award, was filmed, and is still revived all over the world.  Frank, explain its lasting power?

 

FP: All My Sons is about greed, private and corporate greed.  Think of Enron, Wall Street insider trading, cover ups, pay-offs, Robber Barons past and present, Halliburton charging the government exorbitant prices.  Betty, what is Arthur Miller saying in All My Sons?

 

BJP:  He is saying that: we are our brother’s keeper; all the children are our children, even the homeless and the destitute. 

 

FP:  Like the Prophet Micah, Miller would temper justice with mercy.  All My Sons is a morality play.

 

BJP:  Miller then 32, cheered by his first success, cast about for another play idea.  It came by accident.  He ran into his uncle, Manny Newman, who had just seen the Boston theater tryout of All My Sons. 

 

FP:  Saying nothing about All My Sons, uncle Manny Newman instead boasted to Arthur, as he had years before boasted to Arthur’s parents, about his success and the success of his two sons.  He puffed himself up by putting down the Miller sons.

 

BJP:  Uncle Manny Newman, braggart, failed clothing salesman, with selfish sons, was the model for Arthur Miller’s Willy Loman.

 

FP:  Miller wanted to get inside the mind of a failed salesman at the end of his tether, a man whose mind flashes back and forth, mixes past with present.

 

BJP:  Death of a Salesman, written in 8 months in 1948, opened February 10, 1949, in NYC.  Here’s the plot and flavor of Death of a Salesman.

 

FP:  Act. 1.  The curtain opens on the simple one-story one-family Brooklyn home of 63 year old salesman Willy Loman and wife Linda Loman.  The set is a cutaway of the house.  In full sight are:  back of  garage, back garden, steps to living room and kitchen, and an attic bedroom.

 

BJP:  The two Loman sons, around 30, are in shadow in the attic bedroom.  One son, Happy, who lives there, is a ne’er do well womanizer.

 

FP:  His brother Biff, earlier a high school athlete and class cheat, had failed senior math.  Unable to graduate, about to lose his hoped for college athletic scholarship, Biff rushed to his father’s Boston hotel to ask his father to talk his math teacher into giving him a retest.

 

BJP:  What Biff discovered about his father in Boston made him leave home and become a drifter.  Biff is now home on a visit.
FP:  Nighttime.  A bent Willy Loman comes in wearily from the garage, drops his heavy sample cases, sits in the living room, mutters to himself.  His concerned wife Linda from the kitchen says:  “You’re home early.  Is everything all  right?  You didn’t crash the car again, did you?”  Willie answers:  “No, No.  I cut my sales trip short.  Couldn’t get past Yonkers.  Couldn’t concentrate on driving.  Car kept veering off the road.”

 

BJP:   Linda answers soothingly:  “You’re tired, Willie.  Rest now.”  Willy’s mind slips back 15 years. Back from a selling trip.  Bantering with his young sons polishing the family car: “That’s it, boys.  What a simonizing job!….  Remember….  Be liked, be popular; you’ll never want for anything.  It’s the only way to win big in life.”

 

FP:  Linda lists their unpaid bills and this pulls Willy back to reality.   Willy says:  “I’ll do better next week.  I’m well liked in Hartford.”  He adds plaintively, “You know, the trouble is, Linda, people don’t seem to take to me anymore.  I talk too much, joke too much.  I look foolish.”

 

BJP:  Linda affectionately reassures him.  Willie’s mind wanders to the Boston hotel room.  Biff bursts in.  Hears a woman’s laugh….  Biff cries, “Liar.  Cheat…,”  ….runs out.  [Pause] Returning to the present Willy says to Linda plaintively, “I get so lonely on the road.”

 

FP:  Hearing noises, knowing Willy’s back, neighbor Charley enters, greets Willy, suggests a card game.  Neighbor Charley is a successful salesman who knows that buyers avoid Willy.  Charley’s card games are a ruse: he loses, they argue, Charley leaves in a huff, always returns, knowing that his losses will be passed to Linda as Willy’s sales earnings.

 

 BJP:  Willy’s mind shifts to his older successful dead brother, Ben.  Willy asks:  “What’s the answer, Ben?  How did you make your fortune?”

 

FP:  Biff and Happy have heard everything from the attic.   They confront Mother Linda Loman.  Biff asks:  “How long has he been raving like that?”

 

BJP:  Linda replies:  “Willy Loman is not the finest character that ever lived.  But he’s a human being, and a terrible thing is happening to him.  So attention must be paid.  He’s not to be allowed to fall into his grave like an old dog.  Attention, must be finally paid to such a person.”

 

FP:  Linda explains further:  “The man is exhausted.  Still on the road at age 63.  Worse yet, he’s been taken off salary.  Like a beginner.  He  earns only commissions on what he sells.  [She holds up a rubber hose.]  I found this [shaking hose] fitted to the basement gas jet.  He’s suicidal.  I hide it.  But I’m afraid.”  Curtain.

 

BJP:  Act 2.  Next morning.  Willy Loman promised Linda he will ask for an office job close to home, will ask for an advance to pay their bills.  Later, he will meet his boys at a restaurant.  They want to treat him to a dinner.  He departs.  Mother Linda implores Happy and Biff: “Be sweet to him tonight.  Be loving to him.  Because he’s only a little boat looking for a harbor.”

 

FP:  Scene shifts to Howard Wagner’s office, Loman’s boss.  Wagner asks: “Why are you in New York and not selling in New England?”  Willy:  “Howard,  I’m tired.  I need a change.  I’m asking for a home office job.”  Howard Wagner: “But where would we put you?  We sell to buyers through salesmen on the road.  Willy, Business is business.”  Willy, slamming his fist on young Wagner’s desk, says: “Your father made promises to me across this desk.”  Wagner:  “Pull yourself together.  People  are waiting.  They’re listening.  I need the office.  Now, take a long rest.  Then we’ll see.  And, turn in your sample cases.”

 

BJP:  Willy, dazed, stumbles out, heads for the restaurant, hopes his boys will have some good news.  His mind wanders.  He asks dead brother Ben: “How did you do it?  What’s the answer?  Nothing’s working out for me, Ben, nothing.”

 

FP:  Happy, first at the restaurant, flirts with a woman.  Biff arrives; is introduced; they talk, drink, laugh; the woman says: “I’ll go and get a girl friend for you, Biff.” 

 

BJP:  A subdued Willy Loman enters the restaurant, sits with his boys, asks if they got the loan they need to go into business together.  Biff says roughly:  “We didn’t get it.  You know why?  Because you always filled us full of hot air.  You ruined our lives.”

 

FP:  Willy Loman, dazed, says:  “I’m not interested…the woods are burning, …the woods are burning, boys, you understand?”

 

BJP:  Willy blurts out: “I was fired today….  I was fired, and I’m looking for a little good news to tell your mother, because the woman has waited and the woman has suffered.…” 

 

FP:  The boys argue with him.  But Willy’s mind is in the Boston hotel room.  Biff’s sudden appearance:  “I flunked math, Dad.  I won’t graduate…  I won’t get that college athletic scholarship.  Talk to my math teacher.  Get him to give me a retest.  You know how good you talk to people.”

 

BJP:  A woman, offstage, laughs.  Biff, shocked, cries: “Liar.  Fake.”  Runs out.  (Pause.) The restaurant waiter shakes Willy Loman back to reality, says: “Your boys just left with the girls; you know, the chippies.”

 

FP: Later that night.  Biff and Happy return home.  Biff guiltily offers flowers to their mother.  She smashes them to the floor:  “Don’t you care whether he lives or dies?  Pick up this stuff.  I’m not your maid anymore.  Pick it up, you bums….  Not one, not another soul, would have had the cruelty to walk out on that man in a restaurant.  Get out of this house.”

 

BJP:  Still later that night.  Willy, gardening by flashlight, speaks grimly to his dead brother Ben:  “Ben, its foolproof.  Don’t you think its foolproof, Ben?  Don’t you think it’s a guaranteed $20,000 proposition?”

 

FP:  Ben replies warily:  “They–might–not–honor–the–insurance-policy.”
BJP:  Linda from bedroom:  “Come to bed, dear.” Willy, still grim:  “In a minute.  In a minute.” 

 

FP:  Willy enters garage.  Car door slams.  Ignition grinds.  Engine revs.  Car speeds out.  Linda cries from the bedroom, “No, No.”  Music flares to a frenzy.  Loud crash.  Metal hits tree.  Glass splinters.  Curtain down.

 

BJP: [Curtain immediately rises for Requiem, Miller's creative use of the Greek chorus, setting the tragic hero against the immensity of time.]
 

 FP:  Requiem.  Front center stage.  Linda Loman and neighbor Charley are dressed in funeral clothes.   Linda lays flowers on Willie’s grave.  She looks around and asks:  “Where are all the people he knew?”  Charley steps forward and says:

 

BJP:  “Willie was a salesman….  A salesman is a man way out there in the blue, riding on a smile and a shoeshine.  When they start not smiling back—that’s an earthquake.  When you get yourself a couple of spots on your hat, you’re finished.   Nobody dast blame this man.  A salesman is got to dream.  It comes with the territory.”  Charley exits.  Linda, alone, says:

 

FP:  “Forgive me, dear, I can’t cry….  Why did you do it?  I search and I search and I can’t understand it.  I made the last payment on the house today.  Today, dear.  And there’ll be nobody home.  We’re debt free.  For the first time…we’re free…”  Curtain.  End of play.

 

BJP:  Wow.  How did the audience react on opening night?

 

FP:  In stunned silence.  Sobs were heard here and there, mainly from men.  Voices said: “I know that family.  Willy Loman is like my father…   my uncle… my cousin….   my friend…”  Scattered applause rose to a crescendo.  Some stood…. stamped their feet.  Others whistled,…shouted,..  “Author!  Author!”  The opening night audience went wild.

 

BJP:  Death of a Salesman ran 742 performances, won Miller his second New York Drama Critics Circle Award, a Tony Award, and the Pulitzer Prize for Drama.  The published play was the first book in play form chosen by the Book of the Month Club.  Miller’s reputation was established.

 

FP:  Tragedies hitherto have been about the fall from high places, a King Lear. a Prince Hamlet.  Death of a Salesman is about the fall of a common person.  Yet it has been called an American tragedy, maybe the greatest American tragedy.  Why, Betty, why?

 

BJP:  Willy Loman’s failure in Death of a Salesman symbolizes to some the failed American dream.  Not all who work hard make it in America.  The American dream of abundance for all may be—just a dream.

 

FP:  We shift now to Miller’s 3 wives.  He was never an easy husband–busy writing, involved with theater people, movie people, surrounded by alluring women.  He confessed sexual temptations to his first wife Mary Slattery.

 

BJP:  Naturally, she was hurt.  Miller’s public appearances with sex goddess Marilyn Monroe from 1951 were the last straw.  Mary told him to leave the house.

 

FP:  Miller moved to Manhattan’s Chelsea Hotel and asked for a divorce.  She agreed in February 1956, receiving child support plus a percentage of all his future earnings.

 

 BJP:  Awaiting his divorce in Reno, Nevada, Miller observed some local drifters.  His short story about them, The Misfits, was published in Esquire, 1957.  Had the drifters lived on the frontier 100 years earlier they might have been nation-building pioneers.

 

FP:  But in the Nevada desert in 1956 they were reduced to rounding up wild horses for a meat canning factory.  In 1961 Miller rewrote The Misfits as a screenplay in order to star his second wife, Marilyn Monroe.

 

BJP:  In the film Marilyn Monroe, befriended by the men, watches in horror as they rope in the wild horses.  Pitying the struggling roped horses she begs the men to set them free.

 

FP:  Marilyn Monroe was born Norma Jeane Mortenson, June 1, 1926, to a father she never knew and a depressed mother who gave her to foster homes.  She married at 16; her husband went into the Navy, ending the marriage.

 

BJP:  She worked in a WW II factory folding parachutes.  Eye-catching photos of her folding parachutes led to her being a cover girl on some 30 national magazines.

 

FP:  She was a nude calendar girl and a Playboy centerfold.  Bit parts in films led to starring roles.  As we know she became a phenomenal sex goddess, but–at terrible cost.

 

BJP:  Marilyn Monroe’s public success could not hide little Norma Jeane’s deep pain.  Publicly glamorous, Marilyn privately had abortions, was drug dependent, ill, late or absent from work, and unreliable.  She threw tantrums; was suicidal.

 

FP:  Her marriage to baseball legend Joe DiMaggio lasted only 9 months.  Desperate for happiness, she clung to older, almost fatherly Arthur Miller from 1951.

 

BJP:  Miller, smitten, succumbed, but could not solve her emotional problems.  Her inability to work almost shut down filming of The Misfits. 

 

FP:  Uncontrollable, she screamed at Miller as she had at others:  get out! get out!  Their 5 year marriage, 1956-61, ended in mutual agony. 

 

BJP:  Her death of a drug overdose on August 4, 1962, made world headlines.  In death she became an even greater legend.

 

FP:  Was Marilyn Monroe, like Willy Loman, killed by the American dream:  Willy Loman because he could not achieve it; Marilyn Monroe because she did achieve it but at unbearable cost?  Miller who created failed fictional Willy Loman, could not save his doomed wife Marilyn Monroe.

 

BJP:  We shift now to 1956 when Arthur Miller was called before the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC).  When told he could get off scott-free if Marilyn Monroe had her picture taken with HUAC’s chairman, Miller refused.  Nor would he name his acquaintances who were communist sympathizers.  He was held in contempt and fined, but a later court reversed that decision.

 

FP:  Miller’s play, The Crucible, is about the Puritan witch trials in Salem, Massachusetts, 1692.  First performed in 1953, it invited comparison with the McCarthy anti-communist witch hunts.  Miller saw both witch hunts as periods of national paranoia, intolerant of dissent. The Crucible is Miller’s most often performed play worldwide, probably because of its warning against national absolutism.

 

BJP:  Arthur Miller’s play in 1964, After the Fall, based on his bittersweet marriage to Marilyn Monroe, appeared too soon after her death and offended her fans. 

 

FP:  Years later at a hotel conference a reporter salaciously asked Miller:  “Do you ever dream about Marilyn Monroe?” Miller, then 80, knocked the reporter down. 

 

BJP:  Until his death (2005) Miller was haunted by tragic Marilyn Monroe.  His new play about Marilyn Monroe, entitled Finishing the Picture, was performed in Chicago and NYC in 2004.

 

FP:  Miller’s third wife was a still photographer on the set of The Misfits, Inge Morath.  She was born in Graz, Austria, May 27, 1923, well educated, spoke several languages.  She declined to join the Hitler Youth, did forced labor at Berlin’s Tempelhof airport, then being bombed daily.  After WWII she was a displaced person.

 

BJP:  Her skill at writing photo captions in magazines and books led her to Paris where she worked with master photographer Henri Cartier-Bresson, a founder of the international photo agency Magnum.  Working with these masters she became a leading world photographer.

 

FP:  Inge Morath and Arthur Miller were married February 17, 1962.  It was a congenial marriage of 40 years until she died of cancer, January 30, 2002, age 79, leaving two children.

 

BJP:  Morath and Miller wrote four books together –Arthur’s words to Inge’s photographs.  The first was titled In Russia, 1969, about Miller’s presidency (1965-69) of PEN International, a world wide writers’ group.  Through PEN Miller helped free imprisoned dissident writers in countries which restricted artistic freedom.

 

FP:  Their other books  were:  In the Country, 1977, a travel book; Chinese Encounters, 1979, and Salesman in Beijing, 1984, the last two about Arthur Miller as director of Death of a Salesman at the Beijing People’s Art Theater.

 

BJP:  Miller’s two children with Mary Slattery (married 16 years, 1940-56) were a daughter and son; the son is a movie producer.  Miller had no children with Marilyn Monroe, who had two miscarriages in their 5 years of marriage, 1956-61. 

 

FP:  Miller’s two children with third wife Inge Morath during their 40 year marriage were a son institutionalized with Down Syndrome; and a daughter who is an actress and film director.

 

BJP: Miller’s writing career was interrupted by a 1973 Connecticut murder case.  Some Connecticut citizens, convinced of a miscarriage of justice, sent Miller (whose home is in Connecticut) clippings of the police interrogation report of 18-year-old Peter Reilly accused of murdering his mother.

 

FP:  Peter, a mixed up boy from a broken home, confused and exhausted, had been coerced into signing a confession which he retracted after a night’s rest.

 

BJP:  Miller was initially reluctant but, sensing fraud, hired a new defense lawyer, a criminal pathologist, and asked the New York Times to cover the retrial.  Peter was found not guilty and freed.

 

FP:  Not wanting to damage further the boy’s life, Miller never wrote about case.  His intervention was in the Hebraic tradition: “He who saves a life, saves the world.”

 

BJP:  Miller was then writing a semi-comic play, The Creation of the World and Other Business.  It was about the Book of Genesis; Adam and Eve, why Cain slew Abel, why God let it happen; who God is, and why each generation reinvents God.

 

FP:  To sum up, Betty:  what made Arthur Miller a playwright?

 

BJP:  Going to the University of Michigan.  Living during the Depression.  Needing money.  He would have become some kind of writer, no matter what.

 

FP:  The Hopwood Prize and Prof. Richard Rowe pointed him toward playwrighting.

 

BJP  The Depression also shaped his political outlook, made him a reformer.  He determined to write plays to improve society.

 

FP:  Being of a persecuted minority made him a reformer.  Through his plays he wanted to fix a broken world.

 

BJP: Broadway gave him great collaborative artists:  play director Elia Kazan, set designer Jo Mielzner, others.

 

FP:  Early failures almost made him quit.  What saw him through was drive, creativity, determination, and luck.

 

BJP:  Still writing at 89, his hit plays of the 1940s-50s coincided with Eugene O’Neill’s The Iceman Cometh, Tennessee Williams’ A Streetcar Named Desire, others.  Yet Arthur Miller’s plays seem richer.  Why?

 

FP:  Miller’s plays about our personal and national times of trouble hold up a mirror to our worse and better natures.  They show us the sinners we are, maybe the saints we could be.

 

BJP:  You mean:  All Our Sons, against corruption?  Death of a Salesman–which questions the America dream?  The Crucible–beware of national paranoia?  After the Fall–why do we worship celebrities?  Creation of the World and Other Business–why we humans had to invent God?

 

FP:  He covers all that and more.  Incidentally, why did we choose to report on Arthur Miller?

 

BJP:  You bought his autobiography at Uplands book sale, Timebends, A Life, 1987.  What  does that title Timebends mean?

 

FP:  Space is curved.  Light curves back on itself.  We don’t think from 1 to 10, A to Z.  Brain cells in our mind interweave memories, thoughts, ideas,.  Hence, Timebends.

 

BJP: We started with other books and topics, then went back to Arthur Miller.  Why?

 

FP:  Miller’s plays are more thought provoking, more rewarding.   Betty, after engrossing yourself in Miller’s life and works, what do you think?

 

BJP:  We have no Shakespeare in the U.S.A.  We have Arthur Miller.  Reading Miller says to me:  it is important to support the arts, subsidize theaters, encourage dance and opera; encourage quality media to drive out trivia.  We need to support schools and colleges where more Arthur Millers can flourish.

 

END.  Chronology Follows:

 

Chronology of Arthur A. Miller’s Life and Works

1915, Oct. 17:  Arthur Aster Miller born in NYC.

1920-28 Attends Public School #24 in Harlem.

1923 Sees first play–a melodrama at the Schubert Theater.

1928 Bar-mitzvah at the Avenue M temple.

1929 Father’s business fails and family move to Brooklyn.

1932 Graduates from Abraham Lincoln High School. Registers for night school at City College, but quits after two weeks.

1932 Various jobs, including singing on a local radio station and truck driving.

1932-34 Clerked in an auto-parts warehouse, where he was the only Jew employed and had his first personal experiences of American anti-Semitism.

1934-35 University of Michigan, studying journalism. Reporter and night editor on student paper, The Michigan Daily.

1936 Writes No Villain in six days and receives Hopwood Award in Drama. Transfers to an English major.

1937 Takes playwrighting class with Professor Kenneth T. Rowe. Rewrite of No Villain, titled, They Too Arise, receives a major award from the Bureau of New Plays and is produced in Ann Arbor and Detroit. Honors at Dawn receives Hopwood Award in Drama. Drives Ralph Neaphus East to join the Abraham Lincoln Brigade in Spain during their Civil War, and decides not to go with him.

1938 The Great Disobedience receives second place in the Hopwood contest. They Too Arise is revised and titled The Grass Still Grows for anticipated production in New York City. Graduates with a B.A. in English.  Joins the Federal Theater Project in New York City to write radio plays and scripts, having turned down a much better paying offer to work as a scriptwriter for 20th Century Fox, in Hollywood.

1939 Writes Listen My Children, with Norman Rosten.

1940 Marries Mary Grace Slattery. Writes The Golden Years. Meets Clifford Odets in a second-hand bookstore. Travels NC to collect dialect speech for the folk division of the Library of Congress.

1941 Takes extra job working as a shipfitter’s helper at the Brooklyn Naval Yard. Writes The Pussycat and the Plumber Who Was a Man, a radio play for Columbia Workshop (CBS), and other radio plays: William Ireland’s Confession, Joel Chandler Harris, Captain Paul.

1942 Writes radio plays The Battle of the Ovens, Thunder from the Mountains, I Was Married in Bataan, Toward a Farther Star, The Eagle’s Nest, and The Four Freedoms.

1943 Writes The Half-Bridge, and one-act, That They May Win, produced in New York City. Writes Listen for the Sound of Wings (radio play).

1944 Daughter, Jane, is born. Writes radio plays Bernadine, I Love You, Grandpa and the Statue, and The Philippines Never Surrendered. Adapts Ferenc Molnar’s The Guardsman and Jane Austin’s Pride and Prejudice for the radio. Having toured army camps to research for The Story of G.I. Joe (film; he wrote the initial draft screenplay; later withdrew from project when they would not let him write it his way), he publishes book about experience, Situation Normal. The Man Who Had All The Luck premiers on Broadway but closes after 6 performances, though it received the Theater Guild National Award.

1945 Focus (novel) published. Writes Listen for the Sound of Wings (radio play). Writes “Should Ezra Pound Be Shot?” for New Masses (article).

1946 Adapts George Abbott’s and John C. Holm’s Three Men on a Horse for radio.

1947 All My Sons, 328 performances, premiers and receives the New York Drama Critics’ Circle Award, and the Donaldson Award. Son, Robert, is born. Writes The Story of Gus (radio play). Writes “Subsidized Theatre” for The New York Times (article). Goes to work for a short time in an inner city factory assembling beer boxes for minimum wage to stay in touch with his audience. Gives first interview to John K. Hutchens, for The New York Times. Explores the Red Hook area and tries to get into the world of the longshoremen there, and find out about Pete Panto, whose story would form the nucleus of his screenplay, The Hook.

1948 Built himself the small Connecticut studio in which he wrote Death of a Salesman.  Trip to Europe with Vinny Longhi where got sense of the Italian background he would use for the Carbones and their relatives, also met some Jewish death camp survivors held captive in a post-war tangle of bureaucracy.

1949 Death of a Salesman, 742 performances, premiers and receives the Pulitzer Prize, the New York Drama Critics’ Circle Award, the Antoinette Perry Award, the Donaldson Award, and the Theater Club Award, among others. New York Times publishes “Tragedy and the Common Man” (essay). Attends the pro-Soviet Cultural and Scientific Conference for World Peace at the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel to chair an arts panel with Odets and Dmitri Shostakovich.

1950 Meets Marilyn Monroe for the first time. Adaptation of Henrik Ibsen’s An Enemy of the People, 36 performances, premiers. The Hook fails to reach production due to pressure from HUAC. First sound recording of Death of a Salesman.

1951 Yiddish production of Death of a Salesman, translated by Joseph Buloff. First film production of Death of a Salesman, with Frederic March, for Columbia Pictures. Inge Morath comes to America.

1951-52 U.S. Tour of Death of a Salesman.

1952 Visits the Historical Society “Witch Museum” in Salem, Mass., to do research for The Crucible.

1953 The Crucible, 197 performances, premiers and receives the Antoinette Perry Award, and the Donaldson Award. Tried his hand at directing, a production of All My Sons for the Arden, Delaware, summer theatre. Asked to attend the Belgian premier of The Crucible, but unable to attend as he was denied a passport by the US.

1954 First radio production of Death of a Salesman, on NBC.

1955 The one-act A View From the Bridge premiers in a joint bill with A Memory of Two Mondays, 149 performances. HUAC pressured city officials to withdraw permission for Miller to make a film he’d been planning about New York juvenile delinquency.

1956 Lives in Nevada for six weeks in order to divorce Mary Slattery and gets the material for The Misfits. Marries Marilyn Monroe. Subpoenaed to appear before HUAC. Receives honorary Doctor of Human Letters (L.H.D.) from the University of Michigan. Goes to England with Marilyn Monroe and meets Laurence Olivier. Revises A View From the Bridge into two acts for Peter Brook to produce in London, England.

1957 Arthur Miller’s Collected Plays published. Convicted of contempt of Congress for refusing to name names to the House Un-American Activities Committee. Short story “The Misfits” is published in Esquire. First television production of Death of a Salesman, on ITA, England.

1958 United States Court of Appeals overturns his contempt conviction. Elected to the National Institute of Arts and Letters.

1959 Receives the Gold Medal for Drama from the National Institute of Arts and Letters.

1961 Divorces Marilyn Monroe. Misfits (film) premiers. Recorded The Crucible: An Opera in Four Acts by Robert Ward and Bernard Stambler.  Sidney Lumet directs a movie version of View From a Bridge. Mother, Augusta Miller dies.

1962 Marries Inge Morath. Marilyn Monroe dies.

1963 Daughter, Rebecca, is born. Jane’s Blanket (children’s book) published.

1964 After visiting the Mauthausen death camp with Inge, covered the Nazi trials in Frankfurt, Germany for the New York Herald Tribune. After the Fall, 208 performances, and Incident at Vichy, 99 performances, premier.

1965 Elected president of International P.E.N., the international literary organization, and went to Yugoslavian conference. Ulu Grosbard’s Off-Broadway production of A View from the Bridge.

1966 First sound recording of A View From the Bridge. Father, Isidore Miller dies.

1967 I Don’t Need You Anymore (short stories) published. Sound recording of Incident at Vichy. TV production of The Crucible, on CBS. Visited Moscow to persuade Soviet writers to join P.E.N.

1968 The Price premiers. Attends the Democratic National Convention in Chicago as the delegate from Roxbury. Sound recording of After the Fall.

1969 In Russia published (Miller’s words to Inge Morath’s photos). Visited Czechoslovakia to show support for writers there and briefly met Václav Havel.  Retired as President of P.E.N.

1970 One acts Fame and The Reason Why produced. Miller’s works are banned in the Soviet Union as a result of his work to free dissident writers.

1971 Sound recording of An Enemy of the People. Television productions of A Memory of Two Mondays, on PBS and The Price, on NBC. The Portable Arthur Miller is published.

1972 The Creation of the World and Other Business, 20 performances, premiers. Attends the Democratic National Convention in Miami as a delegate.  First sound recording of The Crucible.

1973 TV PBS production of Incident at Vichy.

1974 Up From Paradise (musical version of The Creation of the World and Other Business) premiers at the University of Michigan. NBC TV production of After the Fall.

1977 In the Country published (Miller’s words to Inge Morath’s photos). Miller petitions the Czech government to halt arrests of dissident writers. The Archbishop’s Ceiling premiers in Washington, D.C.

1978 The Theater Essays of Arthur Miller, edited by Robert A. Martin published. Fame (film) appears on NBC. Belgian National Theatre does 25th anniversary production of The Crucible, and this time Miller can attend.

1979 Chinese Encounters published (Miller’s words to Inge Morath’s photos).

1980 Playing for Time (film) appears on CBS. The American Clock premiers at the Spoleto Festical in South Carolina, then opens later in New York City. TV film Arthur Miller on Home Ground shown on PBS.

1981 The second volume of Arthur Miller’s Collected Plays published.

1982 One acts Elegy for a Lady and Some Kind of Love Story are produced under the title 2 by A.M. in Connecticut.

1983 Directs Death of a Salesman at the People’s Art Theater in Beijing, the People’s Republic of China.

1984 Salesman in Beijing is published. Elegy and Some Kind are published under the new title Two-Way Mirror. Miller receives Kennedy Center Honors for his lifetime achievement.

1985 Death of a Salesman with Dustin Hoffman airs on CBS to an audience of 25 million. Miller goes to Turkey with Harold Pinter for International PEN. A delegate at a meeting of Soviet and American writers in Vilnius, Lithuania, where he tried to persuade the Soviets to stop persecuting writers.

1986 I Think About You a Great Deal is published (monologue). One of fifteen writers and scientists invited to the Soviet Union to conference with Mikhail Gorbachov and discuss Soviet policies. British production of The Archbishop’s Ceiling, with a restored script.

1987 One acts I Can’t Remember Anything and Clara are produced under the title Danger: Memory! Publishes Timebends: A Life (autobiography), which appeared as a Book-of the-Month Club popular selection. University of East Anglia names its centre for American studies, the Arthur Miller Centre. The Golden Years is premiered on BBC Radio. TB PBS production of All My Sons.

1990 Everybody Wins, a film based on Some Kind, is released. TV PBS production of An Enemy of the People.

1991 The one-act The Last Yankee is produced. The Ride Down Mt. Morgan is premiered in London, England. Receives Mellon Bank Award for lifetime achievement in the humanities.  TV production of Clara, and an interview on A&E. South Bank Show television special on Miller.

1992 Homely Girl is published (novella).

1993 Expanded version of The Last Yankee premiers. Television production of The American Clock, on TNT.

1994 Broken Glass premiers. Interviewed on The Charley Rose Show, PBS.

1995 Receives William Inge Festival Award for distinguished achievement in American theater. Tributes to the playwright on the occasion of his eightieth birthday are held in England and America. Homely Girl, A Life and Other Stories is published (novella and short stories).

1996 Receives the Edward Albee Last Frontier Playwright Award. Revised and expanded book of Theater Essays, ed. by Steven R. Centola is published.

1997 Revised version of The Ride Down Mt. Morgan is given its American Premier in Williamstown, MA. The Crucible (film with Daniel Day Lewis) opens. BBC TV production of Broken Glass.

1998 Mr. Peter’s Connections premiers. Major revival of A View From the Bridge wins two Tony Awards.  Is named as the Distinguished Inaugural Senior Fellow of the American Academy in Berlin. Revised version of The Ride Down Mt. Morgan appears on Broadway.

1999 Death of a Salesman revived on Broadway for the play’s 50th anniversary, and wins Tony for Best Revival of a Play.

2000 The Ride Down Mount Morgan appears again on Broadway, also a revival of The Price.  There are major 85th birthday celebrations for Miller held at University of Michigan and at the Arthur Miller Center at University of East Anglia, England.  Echoes Down the Corridor is published (collected essays from 1944-2000).

2001 Untitled, a previously unpublished one act written for Vaclav Havel appears in New York.  Williamstown Theater Festival revives The Man Who Had All the Luck. Focus, a film based on the book, is released.  Miller is awarded a NEH Fellowship and the John H. Finley Award for Exemplary Service to New York City. On Politics and the Art of Acting is published (essay).

2002  New York City revivals of The Man Who Had All the Luck and  The Crucible. Inge Morath dies. Premier of  Resurrection Blues.

2003  Awarded the Jerusalem Prize.  Brother, Kermit Miller dies on October 17th.

2004  New York City revival of After the Fall.  Premier of Finishing the Picture.

2005   Miller dies of heart failure on February 11 at the age of 89.

 

END of Miller Chronology.

 

For original Miller Chronology, see:
http://bingweb.binghamton.edu/~ccarpen/Miller.htm
For other Miller Chronology, Miller Society Newsletter, and Links, see:
http://www.ibiblio.org/miller/
and:
http://bingweb.binghamton.edu/~ccarpen/Miller.htm
For The official Arthur Miller Society information, see:
www.ibiblio.org/miller/index.html

For google.com entries on—bfparker, Arthur Miller 1915-2005–Making of a Playwright—access:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=bfparker%2C+Arthur+Miller+1915-%3B+Making+of+a+Playwright&btnG=Google+Search

 

END.

“James Albert Michener (1907-97): Educator, Textbook Editor, Journalist, Novelist, and Educational Philanthropist. An Imaginary Conversation.” By Franklin Parker and Betty Parker, bfparker@frontiernet.net

 

 

“James Albert Michener (1907-97): Educator, Textbook Editor, Journalist, Novelist, and Educational Philanthropist. An Imaginary Conversation.”

 

By Franklin Parker and Betty Parker, bfparker@frontiernet.net

 

Note: The following imagined conversation with the late James Albert Michener was originally given in dialogue form by the authors at Uplands Retirement Community, June 17, 2002. 63 Heritage Lane, Crossville, Tenn. 38571-8270, e-mail bfparker@frontiernet.net

 

This paper explores the circumstances that made Michener a world renowned writer and best selling novelist. Was his success due to talent, luck, or sheer pluck?

 

QUESTIONER: Mr. Michener, you grew up an orphan in Doylestown, Pa., north of Philadelphia, and were raised by a foster mother. True?

 

MICHENER: What I knew growing up was that my widowed mother, Mrs. Mabel Michener, took in orphans. My father Edwin Michener died before I was born. We were Quakers. My older brother was Robert. We were a poor but happy family.

 

QUESTIONER: You were 19, a freshman at Swarthmore College, when you were first told you were an illegitimate child. Who told you?

 

MICHENER: An uncle, Edwin Michener’s brother, told me that Edwin Michener died five years before I was born.

 

QUESTIONER: What did Mabel Michener say?

 

MICHENER: That she took me in when I was a few weeks old without a name or birth certificate. She raised me as her son. Others later told me different versions of my birth. I never investigated them. Mabel Michener was the only mother I knew and loved.

 

QUESTIONER: She received little charitable help for her foster home; took in washing; sewed for people; cleaned houses for a realtor in order to live rent-free. What about when she was sick and couldn’t feed you?

 

MICHENER: She left us temporarily with her sister whose husband worked at the Doylestown poorhouse, a dismal place.

 

QUESTIONER: Any bad memories of the poorhouse?

 

MICHENER: One old man committed suicide. I vowed to do anything to keep from ending up in such an ash heap.

 

QUESTIONER: At night Mabel Michener read aloud Charles Dickens’ Oliver Twist; Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Finn; The Iliad, and other poems. Her brother, your uncle, brought home an old Victrola and classical records.

 

MICHENER: She never earned enough to buy herself new clothes. But she shared with us great books, beautiful music, and love.

 

QUESTIONER: You early wandered far from home. Was it because you were curious about people and places?

 

MICHENER: I hitched barge rides on the Delaware River. I hitchhiked out of state with a friend or alone. I sent postcards home saying that I was o.k. I had hitchhiked to 45 states by age 18.

 

QUESTIONER: Here’s an anonymous letter you received when a newspaper article appeared about you and your first book: “Dear Mr. ‘Michener’???? You don’t know who I am but I sure know who you are. You aren’t a Michener and never were. You’re a fraud to go around using that good name…. [Y]ou ought to be ashamed of yourself…. I’ll be watching you, [signed] A real Michener.”

 

MICHENER: I never bothered to find out who sent that letter and later hate mail.

 

QUESTIONER: Your male guidance included the two men who told you that the local poolroom was no place for you. And George C. Murray, a roofer, who started a boys’ club where you played basketball. And high school coach Allen Gardy encouraged your basketball skill.

 

MICHENER: These men kept me and other boys out of trouble. Sports, school, and after school jobs kept me busy.

 

QUESTIONER: Margaret Mead the anthropologist also grew up in Doylestown?

 

MICHENER: She and I had the first library cards at the new public library. Since we’d read all the children’s books the librarian let us take out adult books.

 

QUESTIONER: Your classmate Lester Trauch described you thus: “[Jim Michener] was the poorest boy in school, but the brightest boy. He wore sneakers so worn his toes stuck out. He was not one of the gang, liked to be by himself, was obsessed with basketball, and never wasted a minute. He walked to school reading his lessons; read in the halls between classes. When the history teacher asked a question, Michener was the only one [who knew] the answer. He had done all this extra research. The teacher was fascinated, but we [kids] just laughed.”

 

MICHENER: Mabel Michener kept me and my second hand clothes clean. Ridicule sometimes hurt but I put it behind me. Basketball and my sports articles helped. Our high school yearbook, The Torch, listed me as “the most talkative…most prompt…most original student.”

 

QUESTIONER: Besides many after school jobs you were also a plumber’s apprentice. Your uncle said: “Jim, you are going to be something better than a plumber.” How did you get to Swarthmore College?

 

MICHENER: My Latin teacher recommended me, and maybe helped me win a four year scholarship, 1925-29. I focused on study, books, and reading. For me, seeking independence, Swarthmore was ideal.

 

QUESTIONER: What pleased you most at Swarthmore?

 

MICHENER: Its Honors Program. I pursued my own last two-year self-directed program. I read English and American literary classics and wrote weekly papers.

 

QUESTIONER: You worked in the Swarthmore Chautauqua traveling adult program which offered lectures, operas, and plays?

 

MICHENER: Yes, the summer of 1928. I did various jobs and acted in plays. I worked nights at Swarthmore’s Strath Haven Inn as watchman and switchboard operator. I worked summers at a Philadelphia amusement park, observed people, and saw carnival chicanery of all kinds.

 

QUESTIONER: You graduated from Swarthmore in June 1929, just before the Great Depression?

 

MICHENER: I taught English at a Quaker prep school, the Hill School, Pottstown, Pa. I taught there two years, 1929-31, read a lot and dreamed of being a writer.

 

QUESTIONER: Why did you leave the Hill School?

 

MICHENER: Swarthmore awarded me its Lippincott Fellowship for study abroad.

 

QUESTIONER: You crossed the Atlantic and enrolled at St. Andrews University, Scotland.

 

MICHENER: I saw much poverty and many people on the dole in London, Glasgow, and Dundee. I traveled alone or with student groups in Europe.

 

QUESTIONER: You toured Italy to study art, learned about Mussolini’s fascist regime, and toured Spain, France, Belgium, and other European countries.

 

MICHENER: I observed early fascism, nazism, communism, and heard third world students complain about their colonial masters. I wasn’t surprised when colonialism collapsed after World War II.

 

QUESTIONER: You went to a remote Scottish island, Barra, in the Hebrides to collect old Celtic folk songs and legends. You traveled in Spain with bullfighters who performed in various towns.

 

MICHENER: A St. Andrews classmate told me that Dutch freighters sometimes hired students in exchange for a berth. I worked on a cargo ship in the Mediterranean and earned British merchant marine status.

 

QUESTIONER: The two years abroad heightened your wanderlust. What did you find on your return to the U.S., in the summer of 1933?

 

MICHENER: I saw apple sellers and soup lines in New York City (NYC). At 26, I taught English at the George School, a Quaker secondary school, Newtown, Pa, not far from Doylestown.

 

QUESTIONER: You married Patti Koon while at the George School?

 

MICHENER: I met her while taking summer courses at the University of Virginia. We married July 27, 1935. We went together to the George School.

 

QUESTIONER: Why did you and Patti Koon leave the George School, June 1936, for the Colorado State College of Education at Greeley?

 

MICHENER: To teach social studies in the College High School and to study for a master’s degree, which I received in June 1937. Colorado State was a progressive education college. It emphasized democratic values and the school’s responsibility to help improve society. I also taught four college courses.

 

QUESTIONER: One Greeley colleague wrote: “[Michener] was one of the most dynamic educators I have known…. He stimulated youth to comprehend interrelationship[s] among all fields of knowledge.”

 

MICHENER: The social studies looked at societal problems from historical, geographical, anthropological, and other viewpoints. I used this all-around approach in my 1959 novel Hawaii. At Greeley I learned of the opening of the American West, which I told in my 1974 novel, Centennial.

 

QUESTIONER: During the 1936-41 Greeley years you wrote 15 journal articles, edited one social studies book, co-authored another, and wrote an essay, “The Beginning Teacher,” for a third book. Pretty good for a young educator. Did you write any fiction?

 

MICHENER: One short story, “Who is Virgil T. Fry?,” in Clearing House, October 1941, a journal for high school teachers. It was about a teacher shunned by colleagues, fired by the school board, but beloved by students because he inspired them to learn.

 

QUESTIONER: Why did you leave Greeley? First for Harvard and then for Macmillan Publishing Co.?

 

MICHENER: I took a leave of absence to lecture on the social studies at Harvard Graduate School of Education and to pursue a Ph.D. degree in Education, which I did not complete. I returned to Greeley in 1941. Macmillan’s high school textbook editor, visiting Greeley, wanted me to work for him. Editing and publishing, I thought, would get me closer to writing.

 

QUESTIONER: You were at Macmillan while Europe was plunged into World War II. Pearl Harbor was attacked. Patti Koon Michener joined the WACs. You entered the U.S. Navy.

 

MICHENER: I enlisted as an ordinary seaman in October 1942. In early 1943, at age 36, I was commissioned a lieutenant in the U.S. Navy, received training at Dartmouth College, had assignments in the U.S., but kept asking to go to a combat zone.

 

QUESTIONER: Your small military group was transported to the South Pacific on a merchant marine ship. You never saw the captain, who was rumored to be drunk and in hiding. The unionized merchant marines ran the ship, ate the best food, and used most of the water. What happened?

 

MICHENER: One of our no-nonsense army captains at gun point forced our access to edible food and sufficient water. Before landing we ransacked the missing captain’s quarters. My irascible bunkmate said: Michener, you talk about wanting to travel. I am typing out orders authorizing your official travel anywhere in the South Pacific, signed and stamped with an official seal.

 

QUESTIONER: Did the forged papers work?

 

MICHENER: Until I got other bona fide U.S. Navy orders.

 

QUESTIONER: One of your Navy assignment was to thank with gifts the native men who rescued downed American pilots. Getting to the appropriate island, you explained to a group of Melanesian people that you were looking for these native men. They laughed and pushed forward an older girl who had seen the downed plane, dragged the Americans out, and had hidden and fed them. Describe your mission to Bora Bora?

 

MICHENER: Military personnel are routinely returned to the U.S. after stipulated months in combat areas. On Bora Bora some enlisted men refused to go home. Others threatened mutiny if they were forced to leave. I had to investigate this unusual situation.

 

QUESTIONER: You described Bora Bora as the most beautiful island in the world and as close to paradise as men in this world ever get, that it was inhabited by beautiful Polynesian girls, that there was a party every night. There was dancing till dawn. There was good island food and a regular supply ship from the States once a month.

 

MICHENER: The base was efficiently run during the day. At night a skeleton crew took over. Men left the base by truck or jeep, dropping off one by one at the palm huts of their lovely Polynesian lady friends. Relationships had formed, children were born, all hush hush. I had to report on this sensitive situation.

 

QUESTIONER: You traveled by Navy planes or ships to 49 South Pacific islands, covered about 150,000 miles, landed on hastily built air strips a few days after heavy fighting subsided. What made you finally draft your first book of fiction, Tales of the South Pacific?

 

MICHENER: Returning in the dark from a routine mission my pilot kept missing the poorly lit New Caledonia air strip. We braced for a crash landing, just made it, and were badly shaken. If I had died, I would have left nothing behind. I was approaching 40, mind you. That near crash prompted me to draft South Pacific stories running through my mind.

 

QUESTIONER: Your first draft was written on the island of Espiritu Santo, New Hebrides, south of Guadalcanal, in a Quonset hut, by pecking at a typewriter with your two index fingers. What was the story line?

 

MICHENER: Tales of the South Pacific consisted of 18 loosely connected stories about the comedy, boredom, shenanigans of Navy life on a Pacific island between military battles. The stories showed the interplay of Navy men, Navy nurses, and conniving natives; the funny aspects of military planes, jeeps, bulldozers, canned goods imposed on simple people living on beautiful islands.

 

QUESTIONER: You sent your draft to Macmillan, whose chief awaited your return. You delayed your return for a last tour of duty as Naval historian in the South Pacific. Did Macmillan accept your manuscript?

 

MICHENER: Yes, I was discharged from the U.S. Navy with the rank of Lieutenant Commander and returned to work at Macmillan in December 1945.

 

QUESTIONER: What happened to your wife, Patti Koon Michener?

 

MICHENER: We did not live together after the war. She returned to her South Carolina hometown. I lived in a Greenwich Village apartment, in Manhattan, near Macmillan, where I edited textbooks and in spare time revised my Tales of the South Pacific.

 

QUESTIONER: Tales was to be published in 1946 but was delayed until February 1947, three years after you started it. Why the delay?

 

MICHENER: So that two of the 18 connected short stories could be published in the Saturday Evening Post in December 1946 and January 1947. Had publication not been delayed to 1947, Tales would never have won the Pulitzer Prize.

 

QUESTIONER: Tales was little reviewed except by New York Times book reviewer Orville Prescott, who praised it. He wrote: “This long book of 18…linked short stories is, I am convinced, a substantial achievement which will make Mr. Michener famous…. ” Did Mabel Michener know of your success?

 

MICHENER: Sadly, when I came home from the war she was senile, did not know me, did not know I wrote a book. She died in March 1946.

 

QUESTIONER: You worked at Macmillan and in your spare time wrote your second book, an autobiographical novel, The Fires of Spring. Why were you slow to leave Macmillan for full time writing?

 

MICHENER: A survey showed the odds against freelance writing: one in 400 novels is published; one of every 2,000+ magazine articles submitted is accepted and paid for; the average full time novelist earned $1,800 a year. And so many people are trying to write the great American novel.

 

QUESTIONER: Then, on May 3, 1948, the Pulitzer Prize miracle happened.

 

MICHENER: I was at Macmillan editing a geography textbook with my senior colleague. The phone rang. He answered, listened, hung up, and said, “That was the Associated Press. Tales of the South Pacific just won the Pulitzer Prize for fiction.”

 

QUESTIONER: You had no idea Tales was being considered, thought the phone call was a mistake. Why do you think it won?

 

MICHENER: I later heard that the Pulitzer selection chairman, New York Times correspondent Arthur Krock, received a phone call from Alice Roosevelt Longworth. She was Theodore Roosevelt’s daughter, wife of the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the matron of Washington, D.C. society. She asked Arthur Krock which 1947 novel was being considered. When told, she said: it does not compare to Michener’s Tales of the South Pacific. Krock immediately put copies of Tales into the hands of his committee members.

 

QUESTIONER: Arthur Krock later wrote: “I gave my reasons [for nominating Tales] and the Board accepted them…. That prize initiated the public and critical awareness of Michener that assured his subsequent literary prominence and success.”

 

MICHENER I met Alice Roosevelt Longworth at a swank dinner. She said: You certainly did well with that prize we gave you. You didn’t let us down. It was daring of Krock to give you that award. Awards should be given to people at the start of their careers, not at the end. How can we be sure who will be a producer and who not? Thank you for making our gamble succeed.

 

QUESTIONER: In 1946 Tales would have lost to Robert Penn Warren’s All the King’s Men. In 1948 it would have lost to James Gould Cozzens’ Guard of Honor. It could only win in 1947 and then only because Alice Roosevelt Longworth intervened. •How was Tales chosen as the source for the Broadway musical, South Pacific?

 

MICHENER: MGM studio heads saw no story line in Tales. The reader who had recommended it to MGM told stage designer Jo Mielziner that Tales had stage possibilities. Jo Mielziner got composer Richard Rodgers and lyricist Oscar Hammerstein II to read the book. They liked it and turned for help to stage director Joshua Logan and producer Leland Hayward, who got Enzio Pinza and Mary Martin in the cast.

 

QUESTIONER: South Pacific was a spirited musical and a compelling drama of U.S. sailors and Seabees awaiting a major battle against the Japanese on a South Sea island. There was the love affair of French planter Enzio Pinza with Navy nurse Mary Martin, and a Navy lieutenant with a Tonkenese girl. The action was rowdy, romantic, and tragic.

 

MICHENER: The music was uplifting; the songs magnificent: Imagine Enzio Pinza’s, “Some Enchanted Evening.” And Mary Martin’s, “I’m Going to Wash that Man Right Out of My Hair.” And “Bali Ha’i. Come back, Come back, to Bali Ha’i,” that haunting melody that evoked the sun-setting beauty of the Pacific Islands. South Pacific had everything, even, “You’ve Got To Be Carefully Taught,” pleading with adults not to pass their prejudices on to their children.

 

QUESTIONER: Rodgers and Hammerstein urged you to invest in the show as an angel. You had little money, had married again, and were building a home. So they lent you money to buy 6% interest in the show. South Pacific ran 1,925 performances, almost five years, and earned you about $10,000 annually. Now what about your second wife, Vange Nord?

 

MICHENER: We met at a NYC party. She worked in NYC as a researcher and wanted to write. We married September 2, 1948. I worked at Macmillan three days a week and wrote the rest of the time. Vange Nord supervised the building of our new home in Pipersville, Pa., near Doylestown.

 

QUESTIONER: For what other reason was South Pacific so successful?

 

MICHENER: Americans like war-inspired dramas: There was Floradora after the Spanish American War; What Price Glory?, All Quiet on the Western Front after World War I; Mister Roberts, South Pacific after World War II.

 

QUESTIONER: Your literary agent Helen Strauss wrote this about you: “…[Michener] is a man of many moods and a loner, and his interests are varied. One might be put off by his reticence, but his modesty and humility are genuine.”

 

MICHENER: Helen Strauss, great literary agent, got Holiday magazine editors to finance my 8-month 1949 return to the South Pacific for an article series on Fiji, Australia, and New Zealand. Random House published it as Return to Paradise, made into two motion pictures, one with Gary Cooper, the other with Paul Newman. She got me another late summer 1950 trip to write about Asia for Life magazine.

 

QUESTIONER: Your Voice of Asia, published in late 1951, was selected by the Literary Guild in 1952 and translated into 53 languages. Why this public interest in Asia?

 

MICHENER: The U.S. and USSR competed to win Asian loyalties. I wanted to write fiction but Strauss got me Cold War reportorial assignments. I went to Asia again the second half of 1952.

 

QUESTIONER: Strauss also put you in touch with Reader’s Digest founder DeWitt Wallace?

 

MICHENER: I lunched with the DeWitt Wallaces summer 1952. We talked about the Korean War. I analyzed it for them. We hit it off.

 

QUESTIONER: The Reader’s Digest, one of the world’s most popular magazines, had 12 million circulation in the U.S. plus 37 foreign language editions. Its formula was: faith in God, family unity, patriotism, and the work ethic. Your biographer Hayes wrote: “If ever a magazine was designed for a writer, the Reader’s Digest was designed for James A. Michener: teacher, patriot, student of the world, and optimist. The combination of magazine and writer was a perfect fit; one that has been rarely repeated in the history of publishing.”

 

MICHENER: DeWitt Wallace wanted me to write exclusively for the Reader’s Digest. Helen Strauss said that a freelance writer had to be completely free.

 

QUESTIONER: DeWitt Wallace then made you one of the most generous offers in publishing history. What was that offer?

 

MICHENER: He said: You can go anywhere in the world you want to go. You can write anything you want to write. We’ll pay all your expenses, no matter where you go or what you do. You let us have first shot at what you’ve written. If we cannot use it, you can sell it elsewhere and you won’t owe us a penny.

 

QUESTIONER: Besides factual writing about the Korean War for Reader’s Digest you wrote a novel, The Bridges of Toko’ri, based on a real incident. It was published in Life magazine, then as a Random House book, and filmed with William Holden. What was the story line?

 

MICHENER: A World War II U.S. Navy Reserve pilot, happy with his family and civilian job, is brought back to fly a jet fighter in Korea. His mission: to bomb four vital Communist bridges in a narrow ravine at Toko-ri. He knows he is a sitting duck for enemy guns but executes the mission to defend American freedom.

 

QUESTIONER: You narrated “Appointment in Asia,” a weekly half hour TV program for the State Department, were advisor to the Asia Foundation, and were asked to write about Asian problems for various agencies. Did Vange Nord Michener travel with you?

 

MICHENER: Less and less and then not at all. She wanted a writing career and a husband to help her. I was an absent husband constantly writing his next book. She asked for a divorce, which came in January 1955.

 

QUESTIONER: Your 1955 novel Sayonara was timely, about interracial marriage, GIs and Japanese girls, written just before you married your Japanese-American third wife. How did you meet Mari Yoriko Sabusawa?

 

MICHENER: At a Chicago luncheon, 1954. For Life magazine I interviewed a GI and his Tokyo-born war bride living in Chicago. At the luncheon Mari defended American-Japanese marriages, saying that most do succeed.

 

QUESTIONER: Mari was born in Colorado, 1920, of Japanese immigrants. The family moved to California. After Pearl Harbor, the family was interned. A relocation plan for Japanese American students placed Mari in Antioch College, Ohio, where she received her degree. She then translated Japanese propaganda into English for a U. S. intelligence service.

 

MICHENER: She was editor of the American Library Association’s Bulletin in Chicago when we met in 1954. We were married October 23, 1955 and had 39 glorious years together.

 

QUESTIONER: Your biographer Hayes thus described her: Mari regarded marriage as her career. She cared about his peace of mind. To see Jim Michener you first had to penetrate her protective wall…. She was his housekeeper, cook, secretary, travel agent, librarian, valet, hostess, chauffeur, and accountant. She freed him to work uninterrupted. He cherished her. oMr. Michener, how were you and Mari involved in the October 1956 Hungarian revolt against the USSR? Why did you write The Bridge at Andau, 1957?

 

MICHENER: I was in Europe in 1956 with Mari. The Reader’s Digest editor cabled me to cover the Hungarian revolt. I saw it as a harbinger of things to come. Soviet economics did not work. The USSR controlled Eastern Europe by force. On October 23, 1956, young Budapest dissidents, armed with sticks, stones, and Molotov cocktails, challenged Soviet tanks. Soviet reinforcements crushed the revolt, killed 80,000 Hungarians, forced 20,000 to flee, most of them over a bridge at Andau on the Austrian border. Mari, in Vienna, 50 miles away, made our home a way station for escaping Hungarians. I interviewed hundreds of them and helped some find residence in the U.S. and elsewhere.

 

QUESTIONER: Your biographer Hayes wrote this of your Hungarian experience: …”Michener patrolled the border alongside ministers, rabbis, fellow journalists, and the interpreters who helped him interview refugees as they crossed the rickety wooden footpath…near Andau. Hundreds…who crossed the bridge received a card bearing Michener’s address…and the promise of a hot meal…in exchange for their stories…. Many…wept for…their parents, children, countrymen…[left behind]…. Michener…had never witnessed an event more brutal….”

 

MICHENER: World editions of Reader’s Digest, March 1957, published a condensed version of The Bridge at Andau. Random House gave its profits to Hungarian relief. My royalties went to the Academy of Arts in Honolulu.

 

QUESTIONER: How did you feel about The Bridge at Andau?

 

MICHENER: It was a satisfying blow against Communism. I then determined to write epic novels, the first about Hawaii. In 1958 Mari and I moved to Waikiki.

 

QUESTIONER: The initial outline of your novel Hawaii shows its large scope, 1050 A.D. to 1954. You described minutely each incoming group: Polynesians, Japanese, and Filipinos through family stories, by generations, each a short novel in itself. Through successive characters you show the full range of Hawaiian history. •Mr. Michener, why was your novel about Hawaii timely?

 

MICHENER: Hawaii, like America, was a melting pot settled by immigrants. It was a bridge to Asia. It was ripe for statehood. It had little crime and good schools. It paid more in federal taxes than ten states. Hawaii was published just before statehood, rode a crest of publicity, and was number three best seller of 1959 novels.

 

QUESTIONER: A Saturday Review writer recorded this: “Hawaii is…a masterful job of research, an absorbing performance of story telling, and a monumental account of the islands from geologic birth to sociological emergence as the newest, and perhaps the most interesting of the United States.” Your biographer Hayes quoted you as saying: “With Hawaii I finally found great faith in myself as a writer….” Mr. Michener, why did you enter politics in the 1960s?

 

MICHENER: I was chairman of the Bucks County, Pa., committee to elect John F. Kennedy in 1960. My mistake was to run in 1962 as a Democrat candidate for Congress. Wise Mari kept saying, “Don’t do it, don’t do it.” I lost and went back to writing books.

 

QUESTIONER: What inspired your novel, The Source, published in 1965?

 

MICHENER: I was in the Mediterranean in April 1963 when I ran into the future mayor of Jerusalem. He asked me to write a book about Israel similar to my book on Hawaii.

 

QUESTIONER: You said it should be written by a Jew but you then and there outlined such a novel for him. He couldn’t find a Jewish writer and urged you to do it. You said you’d do it if you received bibliographic help.

 

MICHENER: Mari and I moved to Israel in May 1963, read hundreds of book, and pondered how to capture the Holy Land’s long, tempestuous history. I did it through one archaeological dig, or Tell, at Makor, which means “source,” sifting 15 layers of civilization through fictional families, showing the socio-economic-religious interaction of Jews, Christians, and Arabs, through peace and war from Biblical times to modern Israel.

 

QUESTIONER: Mr. Michener, our time is almost gone. We’ve traced you to age 60. You lived 30 more years, wrote more books, had quadruple bypass heart surgery, a hip replacement, and 4 years of dialysis, as listed in the Chronology below. •Mr. Michener, you gave millions of readers pleasure, information, and hope. •Your tax advisor estimated that the U. S. spent $11,000 to educate you. You repaid society with over $68 million in income taxes. You and Mari (she died in 1994) donated over $100 million to educational institutions. Not bad for an orphan. Sleep well in your Austin, Texas grave. Sleep well.

 

Selected Works about James Albert Michener:

 

Becker, George J. James A. Michener. New York: Frederick Ungar, 1983.

 

Groseclose, Karen, and David A. Groseclose. James A. Michener: A Bibliography. Austin, Texas: State House Press, 1996.

 

Hayes, John P. James A. Michener. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Co., 1984.

 

Michener, James A. The World is My Home: A Memoir. New York: Fawcett Columbine, 1992.

 

Severson, Marilyn S. James A Michener. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1996.
Internet

 

A computer internet search under James Albert Michener (1907-79) using any major search engine (http://www.google.com or others) will uncover a wealth of pertinent material.

 

James Albert Michener (1907-97) Chronology of Career, Published Books, Honors:

 

1907, allegedly born February 3, 1907, an orphan, raised in foster home run by Mabel (Haddon) Michener (d. 1946), Doylestown, Pa. (Bucks County).

 

1921-25, Doylestown High School, Associate Editor of Torch, 2 years; Ed. In chief, 1 year. Basketball. Class President.

 

1925-29, Swarthmore College, 4-year scholarship, Contributions to “Portfolio.” Graduated with B.A., English & History, With Highest Honors. 1928, summer, traveled with Swarthmore Chautauqua group.

 

1929-31, teacher, The Hill School, Pottstown, Pa. (Quaker prep school).

 

1931-33, awarded Swarthmore’s Joshua Lippincott Fellowship for study/travel abroad. Studied at St. Andrews University, Scotland. Traveled widely in Europe.

 

1935, Married Patti Koon (divorced 1948).

 

1933-36, teacher, The George School, Newtown, Pa. (Quaker prep school).

 

1936-39, Associate Professor, Colorado State College of Education, Greeley. M.A. in 1937. 1938-40, Co-founded Angells Club, a discussion group with Colorado State College of Education, Greeley faculty, and community members.

 

1939-40, Visiting lecturer, Graduate School of Education, Harvard University.

 

1939, Edited The Future of the Social Studies (National Council for the Social Studies).

 

1940, co-authored The Unit in the Social Studies: Proposals for an Experimental Social Studies Curriculum (Harvard University Press). Introductory essay, “The Beginning Teacher,” 10th Yearbook of the NCSS (Harvard University Press). 15 journal articles published, 1936-41.1940-41, 1946-49, Social Studies editor, Macmillan Publishing Co.

 

1942-46, U.S. Navy; sent to South Pacific, spring 1944. 1944-46, Naval historian, South Pacific; discharged with rank of Lieutenant Commander, U.S. Navy.

 

1947, Tales of the South Pacific, fiction, 18 connected short stories. Pulitzer Prize.

 

1948, divorced by Patti Koon, married Vange Nord.

 

1949, The Fires of Spring, autobiographical novel (New York: Random House). South Pacific, Broadway stage musical.

 

1951, Return to Paradise, non fiction, on Asian countries. The Voice of Asia.

1952-70, Roving editor, Readers Digest.

1953, President of the Asia Institute; The Bridges at Toko-Ri, novel about Korea War.

1954, Sayonara, novel about U.S. military-Japanese marriage. The Floating World.

1955, Divorced by Vange Nord, married Mari Yoriko Sabusawa (1920-94).

1956, Aided Hungarian refugees.

1957, Appointed to Federal Advisory Arts Commission. The Bridge at Andau, non fiction, about 1956 Hungarian revolt against USSR rule. Rascals in Paradise. Selected Writings of James A. Michener.

1958, Overseas Press Club Award for Readers Digest article on Andau (The Bridge at Andau). The Hokusai Sketchbooks.

1959, gave collection of Japanese prints to Honolulu Academy of Arts. Hawaii. Japanese Prints: From the Early Masters to the Modern.

1960, Chairman, Bucks County Citizens for Kennedy. 1961, Report of the County Chairman (Bucks County chairman to elect J.F. Kennedy). Appointed by Pres. Kennedy to manage U.S. Food for Peace. Program failed.

1962, Modern Japanese Prints. Ran and lost as Democratic candidate for Congress from 8th District, Pa.

1963, Caravans, novel. Helped establish Bucks County Arts Festival. Joined Americans for Permanent Peace in the Middle East. Received Einstein Award, Einstein Medical College.

1964, severe heart attack.

1965, The Source, novel about the Holy Land.

1967-68, President, Pennsylvania electoral College.

1968, Iberia, story about Spain. Gave collection of contemporary American art to the University of Texas, Austin.

1969, Presidential Lottery. The Reckless Gamble in Our Electoral System. The Quality of Life, essays.

1970, Facing East; the Quality of Life. Gave $100,000 to Swarthmore College programs for black studies and race relations. American-Hungarian Studies Award from George Washington University.

1970-74, Member, U.S. Advisory Commission on Information. Gave $100,000 to Kent State University for arts program.

1971, Kent State: What Happened and Why, factual account. The Drifters, novel.

1972, Accompanied Pres. Richard Nixon to China.

1973, A Michener Miscellany, 1950-1970. Editor, Firstfruits.

1974, Centennial, novel on Colorado and the U.S. West. About Centennial.

1975, Represented Pres. Gerald Ford at Okinawa World Exposition. Appointed to the Bicentennial Advisory Committee and to Citizens Advisory [U.S.] Stamp Committee.

1976, Sports in America.

1977, Medal of Freedom Award presented by Pres. Gerald Ford (highest award granted U.S. citizen). TV series programs, “The World of James A. Michener.”

1978, Chesapeake, novel on colonial settlement of Maryland. Recipient of Pennsylvania Society Gold Medal.

1979, The Watermen. Member of NASA Advisory Council.

1980, The Covenant, novel on South Africa. The Quality of Life. Received the Franklin Award and the Spanish Institute Gold Medal. Gave $500,000 for the University of Iowa Writers Workshop.

1982, Space, novel, story of the U.S. space program.

1983, Collector, Forgers—and a Writer. Poland, novel. Testimony. Member of board for Radio Free Europe. Honored by the White House Arts Program for his financial assistance to artists.

1984, gave $2 million to Swarthmore College.

1985, Dedication of James A. Michener Arts Center, Bucks County, Pa. Received Exemplar Award from Central Bucks Chamber of Commerce. Texas, novel (commissioned to celebrate the state’s 75th birthday), covers 450 years of the region’s history.

1987, Legacy, novel on the U.S. Constitution on its bicentennial.

1988, Alaska, novel.

1989, Journey, novel, an excised chapter from Alaska published separately, describing the 2,043-mile trek of 4 explorers across the Canadian Yukon. Caribbean, novel.

1990, The Eagle and the Raven. Pilgrimage.

1991, James A. Michener on the Social Studies; The Novel, a novel. Gave $1 million to the University of Texas Graduate Writing program at the University of Houston. Gave $5 million to Swarthmore College. Named to the Smithsonian National Postal Museum Advisory Committee.

1992, The World is My Home, autobiography. James A. Michener’s Writer’s Handbook on the South Pacific, as told by James A. Michener [adaptation of the musical South Pacific], novel. Mexico, novel. My Lost Mexico, nonfiction. Gave $600,000 to the University of Northern Colorado Library. James A. Michener’s Writer’s Handbook: Explorations in Writing and Publishing, nonfiction.

1993, Creatures of the Kingdom, novel. Literary Reflections: Michener on Michener, Hemingway, Capote, and Others, (criticism) 1993.

1994, Wife Mari Michener died. Recessional, novel about aging. William Penn. Pledged $5 million each to art museums in Doylestown, Pa. and Texas.

1995, Miracle in Seville. Ventures in Editing.

1996, The Genius Belt: The Story of the Arts in Bucks County, nonfiction. This Noble Land: My Vision for America, nonfiction. Named Outstanding Philanthropist by the National Society of Fund Raising Executives.

1997, October 16, Michener died; buried in Austin, Texas.
(Michener received more than 30 honorary doctorates in Humane Letters, Law, Theology, and Science).

END OF MANUSCRIPT. Corrections, questions to bfparker@frontiernet.net

 

 

 

 

“Robert Michels (1876-1936), German-born Sociologist and Economist.” By Franklin and Betty J. Parker, bfparker@frontiernet.net

“Robert Michels (1876-1936), German-born Sociologist and Economist.”

 

By Franklin and Betty J. Parker, bfparker@frontiernet.net

 

(First written on assignment for McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Biography, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1973, Volume VII, pp. 397-398. See References below.)

 

Robert Michels (b. Jan. 9, 1876–d. May 3, 1936) was a political sociologist and economist who taught in Germany, Switzerland, Italy, and the United States. His “iron law of oligarchy” theory explained how democratic political parties inevitably become undemocratic and elitist.

 

He was born in Cologne, Germany. Michels’s fairly well off family, of German, Flemish, and French origin, enabled him to travel and study in England, at the Sorbonne in Paris, at German universities in Munich, Leipzig (1897), and Halle (1898), and in Turin, Italy. He became a socialist, a member of the German Social Democratic Party, and a syndicalist committed to workers ruling the state. Because of government opposition to his political views, he was not able to secure an academic position in Germany.

 

He taught economics, political science, and sociology at the University of Turin (1907-14). There under the influence of Gaetano Mosca (1858-1941) he became disenchanted with social democracy. In 1911 he published his best known book, Political Parties: A Sociological Study of Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy.

 

Robert Michels became an Italian citizen in 1913. He was Professor of Economics at the University of Basel, Switzerland (1915-26). In 1927 he was invited to the University of Chicago, U.S.A., where he taught political sociology and economics. He also lectured that year at the Institute of Politics, Williams College, Williamstown, Massachusetts. After Benito Mussolini came to power, Michels returned to Italy, joined the Fascist Party, and was a Professor of Economics and the History of Doctrines, University of Perugia (1926-36).

 

In Italy he was known as and wrote under the name Roberto Michels. He occasionally lectured in Rome, where he died on May 3, 1936. Married, he was survived by a daughter, Mrs. Mario Einaudi, wife of a Harvard University professor.

 

Michels’s “iron law of oligarchy” theory in his book, Political Parties, held that democratic parties have built-in characteristics that inevitably lead to rule by a dominant few. The book’s purpose was to explain how parties of the left, particularly the pre-World War I German Social Democratic Party, become de-radicalized. To organize and maintain a mass movement, its leaders must create a permanent bureaucracy with officials. These officials soon become divorced from their worker origins, strive for power, and adopt the style and outlook of the established class. Their radicalism becomes blunted and they oppose whatever threatens their organization’s continuity and their own privileges.

 

The more devoted and zealous a bureaucracy is to its cause, wrote Michels, “the more also will it show itself to be petty, narrow, rigid, and illiberal.” Organizations which begin as democracies inevitably adopt an aristocratic form against which at the outset they struggled.

 

Reformers arise but even they soon fuse with the old dominant class.
Of the pre-World War I German Social Democratic Party Michel wrote, “Socialists [Democrats] can be victorious, but Socialism [Democracy] never.” On the inevitability of his “iron law of oligarchy,” he concluded, “this cruel game will continue without end.” Like his fellow Italian sociologist Vilfredo Pareto (1848-1923), Michels, a disillusioned socialist, ended as a defender of fascist social thought before the rise of Mussolini and Hitler.

 

References

 

Robert Michels’s major book, Political Parties: A Sociological Study of Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy, was first published in journal form in 1908, then in 1911 as Zur Soziologie des Parteiwesens in der Modernen Demokratie.

A new edition, revised and with a chapter added on World War I, was published in Italy in late 1914. The English translation by Eden and Cedar Paul was published in 1915 by Hearst’s International Library Co., New York. Later editions have an introduction by Seymour M. Lipset, New York: Free Press, 1961 and 1966.

 

Robert Michels also wrote:

 

1. First Lectures in Political Sociology, translated and with an introduction by Alfred de Grazia, New York: Harper and Row, 1949 and 1965, and :

 

2. “Social Mobility in General with Special Reference to Post-War Mobility,” XII International Congress of Sociology, edited by the Committee for the Study of Population Problems, Rome, 1936.

 

Robert Michels’s ideas are mentioned in:

 

1.  Part V, “Michels: The Limits of Democracy,” in James Burnham, The Machiavellians: Defenders of Freedom, New York: John Day Co., 1943, pp. 133-168.

 

2. The Best in General Reference Literature, The Social Sciences, History, and the Arts, edited by Paula T. Kaufman, Volume 3 in The Reader’s Adviser: A Layman’s Guide to Literature, 13th ed., series editors Barbara A. Chernow and George A. Vallasi, New York: R.R. Bowker, 1986, p. 211.

 

3. David Beetham, “From Socialism to Fascism,” Political Studies, Volume 25 (March 1977), pp. 3-24.

 

4.  Lewis A. Coser, Masters of Sociological Thought: Ideas in Historical and Social Context, New York: Harcourt, 1971, pp. 206, 240, 242, 249, 420, and 421.

 

5. Robert A. Nisbet, The Sociological Tradition, New York: Basic Books, 1966, pp. 33 and 148-150.

 

6.  Pitirim A. Sorokin, Contemporary Sociological Theories Through the First Quarter of the Twentieth Century, New York: Harper and Row, 1964, pp. 39, 60, 526, 543, 578, 580, and 585.

 

7.  Emory S. Bogardus, The Development of Social Thought, New York: Longman’s, Green and Co., 1946, p. 512.

 

Biographical Sketches:

 

1.  Franklin Parker, “Robert Michels,” The McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Biography, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1973, Volume VII, pp. 397-398.

 

2. Dino Camavitto, “Roberto Michels–in Memoriam,” American Sociological Review, Volume l, Number 5 (October 1936), pp. 797-799.

 

3. David Beetham, “Michels, Roberto (1876-1936),” Blackwell Encyclopedia of Political Institutions, edited by Vernon Bogdanor, Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell, 1987, pp. 364-366.

 

4. Ian Robertson, “Michels, Robert (1876-1936),” Encyclopedia of Sociology, Guilford, CT: Dushkin, 1974, p. 183.

 

5. David Beetham, “Michels, Robert (1876-1936),” International Encyclopedia of Sociology, edited by Michael Mann, New York: Continuum, 1984, p. 237.

 

6. Robert Michels’ obituary appeared in The New York Times, May 7, 1936, p. 26, col. 6.

 

End.

 

For google.com blogs by Parker on above article under—bfparker, Robert Michels—see following URL:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=bfparker%2C+Robert+Michels+%281876-1936%29&btnG=Google+Search

 

End. bfparker@frontiernet.net

 

 

Leo Loeb, M.D. (1869-1959), Pathologist, Experimental Biologist, Cancer Researcher.” By Franklin Parker, bfparker@frontiernet

“Leo Loeb, M.D. (1869-1959), Pathologist, Experimental Biologist, Cancer Researcher.”

By Franklin Parker, bfparker@frontiernet

(Slightly revised from author’s same article in Dictionary of Scientific Biography, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1973, Volume VIII, pp. 447-448).

Leo Loeb, M.D., born September 21, l869, died December28, 1959, was a pioneer cancer researcher.  He was born in Mayen, near Koblenz, Germany, the son of Benedict Loeb, a prosperous businessman, and Barbara (Isay) Loeb.

His mother died when he was three; his father died of tuberculosis when he was six.  His older brother, Jacques (1859-1924), took him to live with their maternal grandfather in Trier, Germany, where he attended the gymnasium, 1875-79.

After age 10 he lived with a maternal aunt, wife of a professor of medieval German history, University of Berlin (their daughter later married Albert Schweitzer, 1875-1965).  Despite having to spend time recovering from tuberculosis in health resorts, Leo attended Askanische Gymnasium, Berlin; then  gymnasiums in Durkheim and Heidelberg.
He entered Heidelberg University, 1989; attended Freiberg University lectures by August Weismann (1834-1914), and spent a semester each at the universities of Berlin and Basel, Switzerland, the last studying under biochemist Gustav von Bunge (1844-1920) and physiologist Johann Friedrich Miescher (1844-1895).

Disliking German nationalism and militarism, he studied premedicine at the University of Zurich, 1890-92; did clinical work at the University of Edinburgh and at London Hospital; returned to Zurich in 1895, passed the Swiss state medical examination, and completed an M.D. dissertation (1897) under pathologist Hugo Ribbert (1855-1920), writing on the results of skin transplantation on guinea pigs.

He visited his brother Jacques, University of Chicago physiologist, in 1892 and 1894 at Woods Hole, Mass.  Attracted by opportunities for biological research in the U.S., Leo immigrated to Chicago in 1897, briefly practiced medicine near the University of Chicago.  He was physician to John Dewey’s experimental laboratory school in Chicago, then was adjunct professor of pathology at Rush Medical College, 1900-02, while doing experimental research in a rented room behind a drugstore.  He became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 1902.

He continued his medical experiments for a few months at the Johns Hopkins University Medical School Pathology Department. He accepted a research fellowship during 1902-03 at McGill University under John George Adami (1862-1926).  He became assistant professor of experimental pathology, University of Pennsylvania, 1904-10.

In 1910 he moved permanently to St. Louis, MO, first as director, pathological laboratory, Barnard Skin and Cancer Hospital (1910-15); then as professor of comparative pathology at Washington University School of Medicine, 1915-1924; and finally as Mallinckrodt Professor of Pathology, 1924-37.  On retiring in 1937, he continued as research professor emeritus, Oscar Johnson Institute, 1937-41,  doing  laboratory research until 1950, when he stopped at age 81 because of severe tuberculosis.

On January 3, 1922, at the age of 53, he married physician Georgiana Sands, a physician’s daughter, in Port Chester, New York.  They had no children.  He died in St. Louis on December 28, 1959.

Leo Loeb’s honors included:

President, Society of Cancer Research,1911;

President, American Association of Pathologists and Bacteriologists, 1914-15.

The American College of Physicians’ John Phillips Memorial Medal Award, 1935.

The Phi Beta Pi Medical Fraternity Annual Lectureship in his name at Washington University, 1937.

An honorary Doctor of Science degree from Washington University, 1948.

Dedication to him of the December 1950 issue of the American Medical Association’s Archives of Pathology, containing a full bibliography of his over 400 published writings.

Leo Loeb’s Contributions:

Dr. Peyton Rous (1879-1970) called Leo Loeb “a founder of experimental cancer research.”

With collaborator Miss A.E.C. Lathrop he demonstrated hereditary factors in cancerous mice and the effects of estrogen on the origin of cancerous tumors in mice.

With collaborator Mayer Fleisher he found that neoplastic cells treated with colloidal copper led to resistant strains in cancerous mice.
He also did research on tissue culture, transplantation, the pathology of circulation, internal secretions, venom of Heloderma, and the analysis of experimental amoebocyte tissue.

His biographer, Ernest William Goodpasture (1886-1960), wrote that while Loeb did not perfect in vitro cell culture, “he conceptually paved the way” for it.

Leo Loeb’s major books:

1. (With M. S. Fleisher), The Venom of Heloderma, Carnegie Publication No. 177, Washington, D.C., 1913.

2. Edema, Baltimore, 1924.

3. The Biological Basis of Individuality, Springfield, Ill., 1945.

Leo Loeb’s Autobiography and Biographies of Him:

1. Leo Loeb, “Autobiographical Notes,” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 2, No. 1 (Autumn 1958), pp. 1-23; was reprinted in “Leo Loeb, M.D.: Some Personal and Professional History and Philosophy,” A Dozen Doctors: Autobiographical Sketches, edited by Dwight J. Ingle, Chicago:  University of Chicago Press, 1963, pp. 86-108.

2. Philip A. Shaffer, “Biographical Notes on Dr. Leo Loeb,” Archives of Pathology (Chicago), 50, No. 6 (December 1950), pp. 661-675, is followed by “Bibliography of Writings of Dr. Leo Loeb From 1896 to 1949″ (over 400 entries). The entire issue is dedicated to Leo Loeb.

Obituaries and Biographical Sketches:

1. New York Times (December 30, 1959), p. 21.

2. Ernest W. Goodpasture, “Leo Loeb, September 21, 1869-December 28, 1959,” Biographical Memoirs, National Academy of Sciences, 35 (1961), pp. 205-219.

3. W. Stanley Hartroft, “Leo Loeb, 1869-1959,” Archives of Pathology (Chicago), 70, No. 2 (August 1960), pp. 269-274.

4. George W. Corner, “Loeb, Leo,” Dictionary of American Biography, Supplement Six 1956-1960, edited by John A. Garraty,  New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1980, pp. 385-387.

5. Franklin Parker, “Loeb, Leo,” Dictionary of Scientific Biography, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1973, Volume VIII, pp. 447-448.

6. Marion Hunt, “Loeb, Leo,” Dictionary of American Medical Biography, edited by Martin Kaufman, et al., Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1984, Volume I, A-L, p. 452-453.

 7. “Loeb, Leo,” Oxford Companion to Medicine, edited by John Walton, et al., New York: Oxford University Press, 1986, Volume I, A-M,  p. 678.

8. “Loeb, Leo,” Index to Scientists of the World From Ancient to Modern Times, by Norma Olin Ireland, Boston: F.W. Faxon Co., 1962, p. 386.

9. “Loeb, Leo,” Encyclopedia of Medical Sources, by  Emerson Crosby Kelly, Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins Co., 1948, p. 258.

10. L. P. Rubin, “Leo Loeb’s Role in the Development of Tissue Culture,” Clio Medica 12 (1977), pp. 33-56.

11. Herman T. Blumenthal, “Leo Loeb, Experimental Pathologist and Humanitarian,” Science, 131, No. 3404 (March 25, 1960), pp. 907-908.

12. “Loeb, Leo,” Who Was Who in America, Chicago: A.N. Marquis Co., 1960. Volume 3, p. 527.

13. “Loeb, Leo,” National Cyclopaedia of American Biography, New York: James T. White & Co., 1962, Volumbe 44, pp. 522-523.

14. “The Weakness,” Time, Volume 57, No. 2 (January 8, 195l), pp. 32, 34.

15. Leo Loeb, obituary, Time, Volume 75, No. 2 (January 11, 1960), p. 66.

End.

For above article in blog form, try accessing:
http://bfparker.today.com/2007/07/07/dr-loeb-leo-md-september-21-l869-december28-1959-pathologist-experimental-biologist-and-cancer-researcher/
and:
http://bootlog.com/index.php?cat=travelogs&aut=bfparker&sub=archive&id=22

End.  Send correction, comments to:  bfparker@frontiernet.net

“General Robert E. Lee (1807-70) and Philanthropist George Peabody (1795-1869) at White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia, July 23-August 30, 1869.”By Franklin Parker and Betty J. Parker, E-mail: bfparker@frontiernet.net

“General Robert E. Lee (1807-70) and Philanthropist George Peabody (1795-1869) at White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia, July 23-August 30, 1869.”

 

By Franklin Parker and Betty J. Parker, Email bfparker@frontiernet.net

 

The hot spring health spas of Virginia were the first gathering places of southern and northern elites after the Civil War. It was at the Greenbrier Hotel, White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia, the most popular of the hot spring spas, that Robert E. Lee and George Peabody met by chance for a few weeks during July 23-August 30, 1869. For each this meeting was a symbolic turn from Civil War bitterness toward reconciliation and the lifting power of education.

 

Lee was then president of Washington College, Lexington, Virginia (1865-70, renamed Washington and Lee University from 1871). Peabody had just (June 29, 1869) doubled to $2 million his Peabody Education Fund, begun February 7, 1867, to advance public education in the South.

 

Historical circumstances had made both Lee and Peabody famous in their time, Lee’s fame more lasting; Peabody’s, strangely, soon forgotten. Yet when they met in 1869 Peabody was arguably better known in the English speaking world and more widely appreciated.

 

For Lee, age 62, hero of the lost Confederate cause, it was next to the last summer of life. For Peabody, age 74, best known philanthropist of his time, it was the very last summer of life. They were the center of attention that summer of 1869 at “The Old White.” They ate together in the public dining room, walked arm in arm to their nearby bungalows, were applauded by visitors, and were photographed together and with others of prominence.

 

Robert E. Lee’s Father

 

Born in Stratford, Westmoreland County, Virginia, Robert Edward Lee was the son of Revolutionary War hero Henry Lee (1756-1818), popularly known as “Light Horse Harry.” Henry Lee was a Virginia delegate to the Continental Congress (1785-88), member of the Virginia Convention for the Continental Congress (1788), served in Virginia’s General Assembly (1789-91), was Virginia Governor (1792-95), was appointed by George Washington to command troops to suppress the “Whiskey Insurrection” in Western Pennsylvania (1794), served in the U. S. Sixth Congress (1799-1801), and last served in the War of 1812.

 

Despite this impressive record (Congress voted him a gold medal for his American Revolutionary War exploits) Henry Lee was a less than satisfactory husband, a poor family breadwinner, an absentee father to his five children, was often hounded by creditors, and was several times imprisoned for debt. Robert E. Lee was age six when he last saw his father, who left to regain his health in the West Indies. Young Lee was age eleven when his father died. Robert E. Lee’s biographer, Emory M. Thomas wrote: “All his life, Robert Lee knew his father only at a great distance.”

 

Robert E. Lee’s Career

 

Robert E. Lee attended private schools in Alexandria, Virginia. At age 18, with family finances prohibiting attending a private college, Robert E. Lee, bent on a military career, applied for admission to the tuition free U. S. Military Academy, West Point, New York. His family and friends sent petitions and letters of recommendation to Secretary of War John C. Calhoun (1782-1850). In the summer of 1825 R. E. Lee entered West Point as one of 107 new cadets.

 

Forty-seven of that entering class graduated, Lee among them. He was an exemplary cadet, without a single demerit, held every cadet post of honor, and graduated second in his class of 1829. He was assigned to the engineer corps where he soon won a high reputation. On June 30, 1831, two years after graduating, he married Mary Randolph Custis, daughter of a grandson of Mrs. George Washington (Martha Washington, 1731-1802).

 

Distinguishing himself as chief engineer in river drainage and fort-building projects, he served in the Mexican War, where General Winfield Scott (1786-1866), valuing his military and engineering skills, constantly consulted him.

 

Lee was superintendent of West Point (1852-55). He was the United States military officer ordered to put down the John Brown (1800-59) insurrection at Harper’s Ferry federal arsenal, Virginia, October 16, 1859. Abolitionist Brown’s fanatical attempt to steal federal weapons in order to arm slaves for an insurrection against the South helped precipitate the bitter four-year Civil War.

 

Faced with the “irrepressible conflict,” General Winfield Scott reportedly told President Abraham Lincoln that Lee was worth 50,000 men. Lee was offered command of Federal forces, April 18, 1861, but declined. He told Francis Preston Blair (1791-1876), who approached him on behalf of President Lincoln: “…though opposed to secession and deprecating war, I could take no part in an invasion of the Southern States.” Loyal to Virginia, Lee resigned from the United States Army, April 20, 1861.

 

In Richmond Virginia, at the request of the Virginia Convention, he was placed in command of the Virginia forces, April 23, 1861. Lee’s organizing ability, grasp of military strategy, and his integrity held out for four bitter Civil War years against overwhelming Union strength in numbers, manpower, and economic resources. Faced by inevitable crushing defeat Lee surrendered to General U. S. Grant, Appomattox Courthouse, Virginia, April 9, 1865.

 

He told his defeated troops: “…You will take with you the satisfaction that proceeds from the consciousness of duty faithfully performed, and I earnestly pray that our merciful God extend to you his blessing and protection.”

 

With the Confederate cause lost, Lee sought obscurity and declined to lend his name to commercial ventures. When first invited to the presidency of small, obscure and struggling Washington College, Lexington, Virginia (August 1865), Lee hesitated. He wrote the trustees that he was “an object of censure” to the North, that his presence might “cause injury” to the college.

 

Knowing that Lee’s name and fame would attract students, the trustees persisted. Lee accepted. His biographer Emory M. Thomas wrote that Lee quickly “established himself as a presence in Lexington,” and that in the five years of life left to him (1865-1870) became “the savior of Washington College.”

 

Greenbrier Hotel, White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia

 

The first inn at what is now the Greenbrier Hotel, White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia, was built in 1780, long before West Virginia became a state in 1863. It was a favorite resort for southern elites who gathered there to meet relatives and friends, to rest and recuperate, and to drink and bathe in its healthful mineral springs. Lee, with heart trouble, needing rest, was an occasional health spa visitor, particularly at the Greenbrier.

 

At the Greenbrier the summer of 1868, Lee heard that some young northern visitors were receiving a frosty reception. He asked the young southern women who surrounded him if one of them would go with him to greet and welcome the young northern guests.

 

The young lady accompanying him, Christina Bond, asked, “General Lee, did you never feel resentment towards the North?” She recorded his quiet reply, “I believe I may say, looking into my own heart, and speaking as in the presence of my God, that I have never known one moment of bitterness or resentment.” The next summer of 1869 at the Greenbrier he met George Peabody for the first and only time.

 

Peabody’s Career

 

George Peabody was third of eight children born to a poor family in Danvers (renamed Peabody, April 13, 1868), 19 miles from Boston, Massachusetts. After four years in a district school (1803-07) and four years apprenticed in a general store (1807-10), the 16-year-old in 1811 worked in his oldest brother’s clothing store in Newburyport, Massachusetts.

 

His father’s death that year (May 13, 1811) left the family in debt, their Danvers home mortgaged, with the mother and five younger siblings forced to live with relatives. The Great Fire in Newburyport (May 31, 1811) occurred eleven days after his father’s death. The fire, coming as it did during an economic depression in New England, led many to leave that town and migrate to the South.

 

An improvident paternal uncle whose Newburyport store had burned in the fire encouraged his 16-year-old nephew, George Peabody, to open with him a dry-goods store in Georgetown, District of Columbia. Needing credit, backed by Newburyport merchant Prescott Spaulding’s (1781-1864) recommendation, Peabody secured a $2,000 consignment of goods, basis of his first commercial venture in the Georgetown dry-goods store (1812).

 

His uncle soon left for other enterprises. Young Peabody operated the store and was also a pack peddler selling goods to homes and stores in the D. C. area. With Washington, D. C., under siege by the British he volunteered and served briefly in the War of 1812.

 

Fellow soldier and older experienced merchant Elisha Riggs, Sr. (1779-1853), took the 19-year-old Peabody as traveling junior partner in Riggs, Peabody & Co. (1814-29), Georgetown, D.C. The firm, which imported cloth, clothing and other merchandise for sale to U. S. wholesalers, moved in 1815 to Baltimore and by 1822 had Philadelphia and New York City warehouses.

 

Peabody early took on the support of his family. He sent clothes and money to his mother and siblings, and by 1816, at age 21, he paid off the family debts and restored his mother and siblings to their Danvers home. Handling the Peabody home deed, Newburyport, Massachusetts, lawyer Ebon Mosely wrote George Peabody (December 16, 1816): “I cannot but be pleased with the filial affection which seems to evince you to preserve the estate for a Parent.”

 

Peabody paid for the education at Bradford Academy (now Bradford College), Bradford, Massachusetts, of five younger relatives. He bought a house in West Bradford for his relatives studying at the academy, where his mother also lived for several years.

 

He later paid for the complete education of nephew Othniel Charles Marsh (1831-99), first U. S. paleontologist at Yale University; nephew George Peabody Russell (1835-1909), Harvard-trained lawyer, niece Julia Adelaide (née Peabody) Chandler (b. 1835), and others.

“Deprived, as I was…”

 

Peabody’s May 18, 1831, letter to a nephew named after him, George Peabody (1815-32), son of his oldest brother David Peabody (1790-1841), hinted at his motive for educating his relatives and for his later philanthropies. Particularly fond of this nephew, Peabody paid for his schooling at Bradford Academy and received regular reports of his nephew’s progress. When this nephew asked his uncle for financial help to attend Yale College, Peabody replied in a poignant letter.

 

Peabody wrote his nephew: (his underlining): “Deprived, as I was, of the opportunity of obtaining anything more than the most common education, I am well qualified to estimate its value by the disadvantages I labour under in the society [in] which my business and situation in life frequently throws me, and willingly would I now give twenty times the expense attending a good education could I now possess it, but it is now too late for me to learn and I can only do to those who come under my care, as I could have wished circumstances had permitted others to have done by me.” Sadly, this favorite nephew died at age 17 on September 24, 1832, in Boston of scarlet fever, his potential unfulfilled.

 

Selling Maryland’s Bonds Abroad

 

As purchasing partner in the United States and abroad for Riggs, Peabody & Co. (renamed Peabody, Riggs & Co., 1829-48), Peabody made four buying trips to Europe during 1827-37. In the mid-1830s several states began internal improvement of roads, canals, and railroads requiring European investment capital through state bonds sold abroad. In 1836 the Maryland legislature voted to finance the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal and the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad. On his fifth trip abroad, February 1837, Peabody represented both his firm and was also appointed one of three agents to sell abroad Maryland’s $8 million bond issue.

 

In the financial Panic of 1837 the two other agents returned home without success. Peabody remained in London the rest of his life (1837-69), 32 years, except for three visits to the United States. Nine U. S. states in financial difficulty, including Maryland, stopped interest payments on their bonds sold abroad. Peabody faced a depressed market, with British and European investors angry at nonpayment of interest on their U. S. state bonds.

 

Peabody bombarded Maryland officials with letters urging that interest payments on Maryland bonds be resumed, and back paid retroactively. His letters were published in U. S. newspapers. Abroad, he also publicly assured foreign investors that interest nonpayment was temporary and that repayment would be retroactive.

 

He finally sold his part of the Maryland bonds to London’s Baring Brothers. The Panic of 1837 eased. The nine defaulting states resumed their bond interest payments. Peabody’s faith that they would do so was justified and appreciated. His integrity became known to an ever-wider circle.

 

Some minor fame came to Peabody when the Maryland Legislature (1847-48), realizing what he had done, voted him unanimous thanks for upholding its credit abroad and for declining the $60,000 commission due him. He had not wanted to burden the state treasury during its financial difficulty. In transmitting these resolutions of thanks, Maryland Governor Philip Francis Thomas (1810-90) wrote Peabody, “To you, sir…the thanks of the State were eminently due.”

 

London-Based Banker

In London, Peabody gradually reduced his trade in dry-goods and commodities. Under the firm name of George Peabody & Co. (1838-64) he made the transition from merchant to international banker. He sold U. S. state bonds to finance roads, canals, and railroads; helped sell the second Mexican War bonds; bought, sold, and shipped European iron and later steel rails for U. S. western railroads; and helped finance the Atlantic Cable Co.

 

Asked in an interview, August 22, 1869, how and when he made most of his money, the London-based securities broker and international banker said, “I made pretty much of it in 20 years from 1844 to 1864. Everything I touched within that time seemed to turn to gold. I bought largely of United States securities when their value was low and they advanced greatly.”

 

Morgan Partnership

 

Often ill and urged by business friends to take a partner, Peabody on October 1, 1854, at age 59, took as partner Boston merchant Junius Spencer Morgan (1813-90), whose 19-year-old son John Pierpont Morgan (1837-1913, later Sr.) began his banking career as New York City agent for George Peabody & Co., London On retirement, October 1, 1864, unmarried, without a son, and knowing he would no longer control his firm, Peabody asked that his name be withdrawn.

 

George Peabody & Co. (1838-64) continued in London as J. S. Morgan & Co. (1864-1909), Morgan Grenfell & Co. (1910-18), Morgan Grenfell & Co., Ltd. (1918-89), and Deutsche Morgan Grenfell (since 1989), a German-owned international banking firm.

 

George Peabody was thus the root of the J. P. Morgan international banking firm. He spent the last five years of his life (1864-69) looking after his philanthropic institutions, begun in 1852 with the motto: “Education: a debt due from present to future generations.”

 

Philanthropist

 

Peabody early told intimates and said publicly in 1850 that he would found a useful educational institution in every town and city where he had lived and worked. His 1827 will left $4,000 for charity. His 1832 will left $27,000 for educational philanthropy out of a $135,000 estate.

 

Founded Seven Peabody Institute Libraries

 

Ultimately his philanthropic gifts of some $10 million included seven Peabody institute libraries, with lecture halls and lecture funds. These were, like the lyceums and the later chautauquas, the adult education centers of their time.

 

Later, Andrew Carnegie’s (1835-1919) libraries and other funds, John D. Rockefeller’s (1839-1937) funds and foundations, Henry Ford’s (1863-1947) funds, and those of others far surpassed Peabody’s philanthropy. But it was Peabody’s gifts which first initiated, set policies, patterns, and inspired the later vast charitable and educational foundation movement.

 

The seven Peabody Institute Libraries are in: Peabody, Danvers, Newburyport, and Georgetown (all in Massachusetts); and in Baltimore, where the Peabody Institute of Baltimore (from 1857, total gift $1.4 million) consisted of a unique reference library whose books from European estates Peabody, through agents, bought and shipped to Baltimore at his expense. In fact its holdings were so extensive that the Library of Congress early borrowed from its rare book collection.

 

The Peabody Institute of Baltimore also had an art gallery, lecture hall and lecture fund, a Conservatory of Music, and gave annual prizes to Baltimore’s best public school students. In 1982 the Baltimore Reference Library and the Peabody Conservatory of Music became part of the Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.

 

Other Peabody libraries are in 6-Thetford, Vermont, where he visited his maternal grandparents at age 15, and in 7-Georgetown, D.C.

 

Three Peabody Museums of Science

 

He endowed the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University (anthropology); the Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University (paleontology), both 1866; and what is now the Peabody Essex Museum, Salem, Massachusetts (1867), containing maritime history and Essex County historical documents, including most of George Peabody’s letters and papers.

 

Peabody s Other Gifts

 

He gave the Maryland Institute for the Promotion of Mechanic Arts (Baltimore) $1,000 for a chemistry laboratory and school (1851); Phillips Academy, Andover, Massachusetts, $25,000 for a mathematics professorship (1866); Kenyon College, Gambier, Ohio, $25,000, for a mathematics and civil engineering professorship (November 1866); and former general, then President Robert E. Lee’s Washington College (renamed Washington and Lee University, 1871), Lexington, Virginia, $60,000 for a mathematics professorship (September 1869).

 

He gave $20,000 publication funds each to the Maryland Historical Society, Baltimore (November 5, 1866), and the Massachusetts Historical Society, Boston (January 1, 1867). He gave to the United States Sanitary Commission to aid Civil War orphans, widows, and disabled veterans $10,000 (1864). To the Vatican charitable San Spirito Hospital, Rome, Italy, he gave $19,300 (April 5, 1867). He built a Memorial Congregational Church in his mother’s memory in her hometown, Georgetown, Massachusetts, $70,000 (1866).

 

For patriotic causes he gave to the Lexington Monument in what is now Peabody, Massachusetts, $300 (1835); the Bunker Hill Memorial, Boston, Massachusetts, $500 (June 3, 1845); and the Washington Monument, Washington, D. C., $1,000 (July 4, 1854).

 

Peabody Education Fund for the Southern States

 

His most influential U. S. gift was the $2 million Peabody Education Fund (PEF, 1867-1914) to promote public schools in the eleven former Confederate states plus West Virginia, added because of its poverty. For 47 years the PEF helped promote public schools in the devastated post-Civil War South, focusing on public elementary and secondary schools, then on teacher training institutes and normal colleges, and finally on rural public schools.

 

Without precedent, the PEF was the first multimillion dollar U.S. educational foundation. Historians have cited its example and policies as the model forerunner of all subsequent significant United States educational funds and foundations.

 

Famous in his time, largely forgotten since, underrated by most historians, George Peabody was in fact the founder of modern American philanthropy.

 

Many of the over 50 distinguished PEF trustees (during 1867-1914) who held high offices in the U. S. were also trustees of other later, larger, and richer funds and foundations. They thus helped spread the PEF’s influence far and wide.

 

The common goal of these late nineteenth century, early twentieth century funds and foundations was to use private foundation wealth as levers to help solve education, health, and economic welfare problems in the U. S. South, elsewhere in the U. S., and worldwide.

 

High Offices Held by PEF Trustees

 

Twelve of the over 50 PEF trustees were state legislators, two were U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justices, six were U.S. ambassadors, seven U.S. House of Representatives members, two U. S. generals, one U. S. Navy admiral, one U. S. Surgeon-General, three Confederate generals, seven U.S. Senators, three Confederate Congressmen, two church bishops, six U. S. cabinet officers, three U.S. presidents (U.S. Grant, Rutherford B. Hayes, and Grover Cleveland), or eight U.S. presidents if Peabody Normal College and its predecessor institutions are included, and three financiers.

 

The three financiers who were PEF trustees included J. P. Morgan, himself an art collector and philanthropist of note; Anthony Joseph Drexel (1826-93), inspired as PEF trustee to found Drexel University, Philadelphia; and Paul Tulane (1801-87), inspired as PEF trustee to found Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.

 

Permitted to disband when their mission was accomplished, the PEF trustees gave (in 1914): $474,000 to fourteen state university colleges of education in the South; $90,000 to Winthrop Normal College, South Carolina; and funds to the Southern Education Fund, Atlanta, still aiding African-American education. The bulk of the PEF, $1.5 million (required matching funds made it $3 million), went to George Peabody College for Teachers (GPCFT, 1914-79), Nashville, sited next to Vanderbilt University, GPCFT which still thrives as Peabody College of Vanderbilt University (hereafter PCofVU, since 1979).

 

Peabody College of Vanderbilt University: its Evolution

 

Traced genealogically in Nashville for over 220 years, Davidson Academy (1785-1806) was chartered by North Carolina eleven years before Tennessee’s statehood; rechartered as Cumberland College (1806-26); rechartered as the University of Nashville (1826-75); rechartered as Peabody Normal College (1875-1909, created and supported by the PEF); rechartered as George Peabody College for Teachers (1914-79), which continues as PCofVU (from 1979).

 

Faced with greater class and race divisions and with greater financial difficulties than counterpart colleges in other U.S. sections, what is now Peabody College of Vanderbilt University rose phoenix-like again and again to produce educational leaders for the South, the nation, and the world.

 

Peabody Homes of London

 

Wanting to do something for the working poor of London, Peabody followed social reformer Lord Shaftesbury’s (1801-85) suggestion–that low-cost housing was the London poor’s greatest need. Peabody gave a total of $2.5 million (from 1862) to subsidize low rent model housing for London’s working poor.

 

In 2007 over 50,000 low income Londoners) lived in over 20,000 affordable Peabody apartments in the poorer working sections of most of London’s boroughs. Peabody Trust properties, valued at well over $2 billion, is Peabody’s most successful philanthropy (and least known by Americans).

 

George Peabody’s Last U.S. Visit

 

Long ill, sensing his end was near, George Peabody made his last four-month U. S. visit, June 8 to September 29, 1869, to see family and friends and to add gifts to his U. S. institutes. Greatly weakened, he was met in New York City by intimates who also sensed this as his last U.S. visit.

 

A New York Times article, June 9, 1869, reported his arrival “in advanced age and declining health….” “Wherever he goes,” the article read, “he is worried by begging letters from individuals expecting him to get them out of some scrape… Now that he is in America he should be left to the quiet and repose he so greatly needs.”

 

He went to Boston (June 10, 1869), then rested in Salem, Massachusetts, at nephew George Peabody Russell’s (1835-1909) home.

 

On July 6, 1869, his nephew wrote to his uncle’s intimate business friend William Wilson Corcoran (1798-1888), who was at White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia: “…Mr. Peabody…is weaker than when he arrived…. He has…decided to go to the White Sulphur Springs…[and asks you to] arrange accommodations for himself, and servant, for Mrs. Russell and myself.”

 

In mid-June 1869 Peabody quietly visited the Boston Peace Jubilee and Music Festival and listened to the chorus. At intermission, Boston Mayor Nathaniel Bradstreet Shurtleff (1810-74) announced Peabody’s presence, which brought “a perfect storm of applause.”

 

In a Sunday, June 20, sermon closing the Boston Peace Jubilee, the Reverend William Rounseville Alger (1822-1905) mentioned that George Peabody had done more to keep the peace between Britain and America than a hundred demagogues to destroy it.

 

On June 29, 1869, in more than doubling his fund for southern education, he wrote his trustees: “I now give you additional bonds [worth] $1,384,000….. I do this [hoping] that with God’s blessing…it may…prove a permanent and lasting boon, not only to the Southern States, but to the whole of our dear country….”

 

He added $50,000 to his first Peabody Institute Library (Peabody, Massachusetts, total gift $217,600). At the July 14, 1869, dedication of the Peabody Institute Library, Danvers, Massachusetts (to which he gave a total of $100,000), he said: “I can never expect to address you again collectively…. I hope that this institution will be…a source of pleasure and profit.”

 

At a July 16, 1869, reception, Peabody Institute Library, Peabody, Massachusetts, his 30 guests who arrived by special train from Boston included former Massachusetts Governor Clifford Claflin (1818-1905), Boston Mayor Nathaniel Bradstreet Shurtleff, U.S. Senator Charles Sumner (1811-74), and poet Oliver Wendell Holmes (1809-94). Poet Holmes read aloud a poem titled “George Peabody” written specially for the occasion.

 

Two days later (July 18, 1869) Holmes described Peabody in a letter to U.S. Minister to Britain John Lothrop Motley (1814-77) as “the Dives who is going to Abraham’s bosom and I fear before a great while….”

 

On July 22, 1869, longtime friend Ohio Episcopal Bishop Charles Pettit McIlvaine (1799-1873) wrote to Peabody’s philanthropic advisor Robert Charles Winthrop (1809-94): “The White Sulphur Springs will, I hope, be beneficial to our excellent friend; but it can be only a very superficial good. [His] cough is terrible, and I have no expectation of his living a year….”

 

White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia, July 23-Aug. 30, 1869

 

This was the background when Peabody arrived by special train at White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia, July 23, 1869. Present was Tennessee Superintendent of Public Instruction and later U.S. Commissioner of Education John Eaton, Jr. (1829-1906).

 

John Easton wrote in his annual report: “Mr. Peabody shares with ex-Governor Wise the uppermost cottage in Baltimore Row, and sits at the same table with General Lee, Mr. Corcoran, Mr. Taggart, and others…. Being quite infirm, he has been seldom able to come to parlor or dining room, though he has received many ladies and gentlemen at the cottage…. His manners are singularly affable and pleasing, and his countenance one of the most benevolent we have ever seen.”

 

Peabody’s confinement to his cottage prompted a meeting on July 27, 1869, at which former Virginia Governor Henry Alexander Wise (1806-76) drew up resolutions of praise read in Peabody’s presence the next day (July 28, 1869) in the “Old White” hotel parlor. The resolutions read in part: “On behalf of the southern people we tender thanks to Mr. Peabody for his aid to the cause of education…and hail him ‘benefactor.’”

 

Peabody, seated, replied, “If I had strength, I would speak more on the heroism of the Southern people. Your kind remarks about the Education Fund sound sweet to my ears. My heart is interwoven with its success.”

 

The Peabody Ball

 

Merrymakers at the “Old White” held a Peabody Ball on August 11, 1869. Too ill to attend, Peabody heard the gaiety from his cottage.

 

Historian Perceval Reniers wrote of this Peabody Ball: “The affair that did most to revive [the Southerners’] esteem was the Peabody Ball…given to honor…Mr. George Peabody…. Everything was right for the Peabody Ball. Everybody was ready for just such a climax, the background was a perfect build-up. Mr. Peabody appeared at just the right time and lived just long enough. A few months later it would not have been possible, for Mr. Peabody would be dead.”

 

The PEF’s first administrator Barnas Sears (1802-80), present at White Sulphur Springs that July 23-Aug. 30, 1869, recorded why Peabody’s presence there was important to the PEF’s work in promoting public education in the South.

 

Sears wrote: “…both on account of his unparalleled goodness and of his illness among a loving and hospitable people [he received] tokens of love and respect from all, such as I have never before seen shown to any one. This visit…will, in my judgment, do more for us than a long tour in a state of good health….”

 

Famous Photos of George Peabody and Robert E. Lee

 

Peabody, Lee, and others were central figures in several remarkable photos taken at White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia, on August 12, 1869. In the main photograph the five individuals seated on cane-bottomed chairs were, left to right: Turkey’s Minister to the U.S. Edouard Blacque Bey (1824-95); General Robert E. Lee, Peabody, William Wilson Corcoran, and Richmond, Virginia, judge and public education advocate James Lyons (1801-82).

 

Standing behind the five seated figures were seven former Civil War generals, their names in dispute until correctly identified in 1935 by Leonard T. Mackall of Savannah, Georgia (from left to right): James Conner (1829-83) of South Carolina, Martin W. Gary (1831-81) of South Carolina, Robert Doak Lilley (1836-86) of Virginia, P.G.T. Beauregard (1818-93) of Louisiana, Alexander Robert Lawton (1818-96) of Georgia, Henry Alexander Wise (1806-76) of Virginia, and Joseph L. Brent (b.1826) of Maryland.

 

There is also a photo of Peabody sitting alone and a photo of Lee, Peabody, and William Wilson Corcoran sitting together.

 

Peabody’s Gifts to Lee

 

That August 1869 Peabody gave Lee a small private gift of $100 for Lee’s Episcopal church in Lexington, Virginia, in need of repairs (William Wilson Corcoran also gave $100). Peabody also gave to Lee’s Washington College Virginia state bonds he owned worth $35,000 when they were lost on the ship Arctic, a Collins Line steamer, sunk with the loss of 322 passengers on September 27, 1854, 20 miles off Cape Race, Newfoundland.

 

Peabody ‘s petition to the Virginia legislature to reimburse him for the lost bonds had been unsuccessful when he gave Lee’s college the value of the bonds for a mathematics professorship. Eventually the value of the lost bonds and the accrued interest, $60,000 total, were paid by the State of Virginia to Washington and Lee University

 

With wry humor Lee’s biographer C.B. Flood described George Peabody’s gift: “It was generosity with a touch of Yankee shrewdness: you Southerners go fight it out among yourselves. If General Lee can’t get [this lost bond money] out of the Virginia legislature, nobody can.”

 

Peabody left White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia, August 30, 1869, in a special railroad car provided by longtime friend, Baltimore and Ohio Railroad President John Work Garrett (1820-84). Lee rode a short distance in the same car with Peabody. They parted, never to meet again.

 

Peabody recorded his last will (September 9, 1869) in New York City, had his tomb built at Harmony Grove Cemetery, Salem, Massachusetts (September 10, 1869), ordered a granite sarcophagus to mark his grave, and boarded the Scotia in New York City September 29, 1869. He landed at Queenstown, Ireland, October 8, 1869, and was rushed to rest at the London home of longtime business friend Sir Curtis Miranda Lampson (1806-85), where he died November 4, 1869.

 

Lee Sent His Photograph

 

On Sept. 25, 1869, at the request of Peabody Institute Librarian Fitch Poole (1803-73, Peabody, Massachusetts), Lee sent Poole a photograph of himself, adding that he would “feel honoured in its being placed among the ‘friends’ of Mr. Peabody, who can be numbered by the millions, yet all can appreciate the man who has [illumined] his age by his munificent charities during his life, and by his wise provisions for promoting the happiness of his fellow creatures.”

 

Robert E. Lee on George Peabody’s Death

 

Reading of Peabody’s death in London (November 4, 1869), Robert E. Lee wrote (November 10, 1869) to Peabody’s nephew George Peabody Russell, who had been with his uncle in White Sulphur Springs and there had met Lee: “The announcement of the death of your uncle, Mr. George Peabody, has been received with the deepest regret wherever his name and benevolence are known; and nowhere have his generous deeds–restricted to no country, section or sect–elicited more heartfelt admiration than at the South. He stands alone in history for the benevolent and judicious distribution of his great wealth, and his memory has become entwined in the affections of millions of his fellow-citizens in both hemispheres.”

 

“I beg, in my own behalf,” Lee continued, “and in behalf of the Trustees and Faculty of Washington College, Virginia, which was not forgotten by him in his act of generosity, to tender the tribute of our unfeigned sorrow at his death. ¶With great respect, Your obedient servant R.E. Lee.”

 

Concern Over Lee’s Attending Peabody’s Funeral

 

Lee had been invited to attend Peabody’s final funeral service and eulogy, South Congregational Church, Peabody, Massachusetts, followed by burial in Harmony Grove Cemetery, Salem, Massachusetts, February 8, 1870. But Peabody’s intimates feared that Lee’s attendance might evoke an ugly incident. After President Lincoln’s assassination, Congressional radical Republicans, bent on revenge, crushed the defeated South with military rule. Anti-South, anti-Lee anger was also strong among New England abolitionists.

 

Robert Charles Winthrop, Peabody’s philanthropic advisor and president of the PEF trustees, who was to deliver Peabody’s funeral eulogy February 8, 1870, feared that Lee’s attendance might bring on a demonstration. On February 2, 1870, Winthrop wrote two private and confidential letters, the first to Baltimorean John Pendleton Kennedy (1795-1870): “There is apprehension here, that if Lee should come to the funeral, something unpleasant might occur, which would be as painful to us as to him. Would you contact friends to impart this to the General? Please do not mention that the suggestion came from me.”

 

Winthrop also wrote to Corcoran: “I write to you in absolute confidence. Some friends of ours, whose motives cannot be mistaken, are very anxious that Genl. Lee should not come to the funeral next week…. There is … apprehension that from an irresponsible crowd there might come some remarks which would be offensive to him and painful to us all. I am sure he would be the last person to involve himself or us, needlessly, in a doubtful position on such an occasion.”

 

Winthrop continued to Corcoran: “The newspapers at first said that he was not coming. Now, there is an intimation that he is. I know of no one who could [more] effectively give the right direction to his views than yourself. Your relation to Mr. Peabody & to Mr. Lee would enable you to ascertain his purposes & shape his course wisely…. I know of no one else to rely on.”

 

One of the two Washington College trustees who planned to attend Peabody’s funeral had earlier written to Corcoran (January 26, 1870): “I first thought that General Lee should not go, but have now changed my mind. Some of us believe that if you advise the General to attend he would do so. Use your own discretion in this matter.”

 

Lee Too Ill to Attend

 

Lee explained in a January 26, 1870, letter to William Wilson Corcoran: “I am sorry I cannot attend the funeral obsequies of Mr. Peabody. It would be some relief to witness the respect paid to his remains, and to participate in commemorating his virtues; but I am unable to undertake the journey. I have been sick all the winter, and am still under medical treatment. I particularly regret that I shall not have the pleasure of seeing you. Two trustees of Washington College will attend the funeral. I hope you can join them.”

 

On the same day Winthrop wrote his letters (February 2, 1870), Lee wrote his daughter Mildred Childe Lee (1846-1904) that he was too ill to attend: “I am sorry that I could not attend Mr. Peabody’s funeral, but I did not feel able to undertake the journey, especially at this season.”

 

Corcoran too replied to Winthrop that Lee had no intention of coming. Corcoran could not imagine, he wrote, that so good and great a man as Lee would receive anything but a kind reception. Himself ill, Corcoran wrote to Lee his regret that he could not attend to pay his respects to “my valued old friend.” Peabody’s intimates were relieved at confirmation that Lee’s illness would definitely keep him from the funeral.

 

Unusual Trans-Atlantic Funeral Honors

 

Lee, Corcoran, and much of the English-speaking reading public, awed by Peabody’s unusual 96-day transatlantic funeral, awaited its final scene: Robert Charles Winthrop’s eulogy and Peabody’s final burial (both February 8, 1870). Peabody’s funeral was unprecedented in length, pomp, and ceremony; was marked by cold stormy weather; involved the highest officials of England and the United States; was vastly publicized in the press of both countries; and was observed in person by many thousands of Britons and Americans.

 

The Peabody funeral included: 1-Westminster Abbey service (November 12, 1869) and temporary burial there for 30 days (November 12-December 11, 1869). When Peabody’s will became known requiring burial in Salem, Massachusetts, 2-the British cabinet decided (November 10, 1869), at Queen Victoria’s suggestion, to return his remains for burial in the U. S. on Her Majesty’s Ship HMS Monarch, Britain’s newest and largest warship, repainted for this grim occasion slate gray above the water line, with a specially built mortuary chapel.

 

Next came a 3-U. S. government decision (made between November 12-15, 1869) to send the United States corvette USS Plymouth from Marseilles, France, to accompany HMS Monarch to the United States. Then followed 4-transfer (December 11, 1869) of Peabody’s remains from Westminster Abbey, London, on a special funeral train to Portsmouth, England, impressive ceremonies at the transfer of remains from Portsmouth dock to HMS Monarch, specially outfitted as a funeral vessel.

 

Next came the 5-transatlantic crossing of HMS Monarch and the USS Plymouth (December 21, 1869 to January 25, 1870) from Spithead near Portsmouth, past Ushant, France, to Madeira Island off Portugal, to Bermuda, and north to Portland, Maine, chosen by the British Admiralty because of its deeper harbor.

 

A covert rivalry had early erupted between 6-Bostonians and New Yorkers about which city could provide the more solemn ceremony as receiving port. Thinking themselves the center of northeast society and fashion, each was disappointed when the British Admiralty chose Portland, Maine, whose deeper harbor more safely accommodated HMS Monarch‘s large size.

 

A contemporary news account described the petty jealousy: “When the mighty men of Boston knew that England’s…”Monarch” was bringing the body of the great philanthropist to his last resting place, they called a meeting and decided with what fitting honors and glories it would be received…. but, when the telegraph flashed the astounding news that little Portland was to be the port…all was changed….[Bostonians were sure] that the Portlanders…would blunder….”

 

On January 14, 1870, on President U. S Grant’s approval, 7-U. S. Navy Secretary George Maxwell Robeson (1829-97) ordered Admiral David Glasgow Farragut (1801-70), a PEF trustee, to command a U.S. naval flotilla to meet HMS Monarch and USS Plymouth in Portland harbor, Maine (January 25, 1870). HMS Monarch‘s captain then requested, on behalf of Queen Victoria, 8-that the coffin remain aboard the Monarch in Portland harbor for two days (January 27-28, 1870) as a final mark of respect.

 

Thousands of visitors, drawn to the spectacle, viewed the coffin in the somberly decorated Monarch‘s mortuary chapel. Peabody’s remains then 9-lay in state in Portland City Hall (January 29-February 1, 1870), viewed by thousands. 10-A special funeral train from Portland, Maine, bore the remains to Peabody, Massachusetts (February 1, 1870). 11-Lying in state of Peabody’s remains took place at the Peabody Institute Library (February 1-8, 1870).

 

The final ceremony, the press announced to an awed public, was to be 12-Robert Charles Winthrop’s funeral eulogy at the South Congregational Church, Peabody, Massachusetts, attended by New England governors, mayors, Queen Victoria’s son Prince Arthur, and other notables (February 8, 1870). Final burial would then follow at 13-Harmony Grove Cemetery, Salem, Massachusetts.

 

Why Such Unprecedented Funeral Honors?

Daily reports on Peabody’s sinking condition in London had appeared in the British press. After his death the London Daily News recorded (November 8, 1869): “We have received a large number of letters, urging that the honours of a public funeral are due to the late Mr. Peabody’s memory.” The Dean of Westminster Abbey, Arthur Penrhyn Stanley (1815-81), was in Naples, Italy, November 5, 1869, when he read of Peabody’s death. Years later he recorded: “I was in Naples, and saw in the public papers that George Peabody had died. Being absent, considering that he was a foreigner, and at the same time, by reason of his benefactions to the City of London, entitled to a burial in Westminster Abbey, I telegraphed to express my wishes that his interment there should take place.”

 

The Alabama Claims

 

Peabody died during tense, near warlike U. S.-British angers over two U. S. Civil War incidents, the Alabama Claims (1864-72) and the Trent Affair (September 8, 1861).

 

Without a navy, with its southern ports blockaded by the North, Confederate agents slipped secretly to England, bought British-built ships, armed them as Confederate raiders, renamed them Alabama, Florida, Shenandoah, and others, which sank northern ships and cost northern lives and treasure.

 

Officially neutral in the U. S. Civil War, British officials were continually reminded of their breach of neutrality by U. S. Minister to Britain Charles Francis Adams (1807-86). Official U. S. demands for reparations for damages from British-built raiders (from1862) were resolved at a Geneva international tribunal (1871-72), requiring Britain to pay the United States $15.5 million indemnity.

 

At Peabody’s death, November 4, 1869, this Alabama Claims controversy was unresolved and tense. Americans were angry; Britons were resentful. A desire to defuse angers over the Alabama Claims was one reason British officials first, and then United States officials to surpass them, outdid each other in unusual homage to Peabody’s remains during his transatlantic funeral.

 

Trent Affair

 

There was also lingering resentment over the still rankling November 8, 1861 Trent Affair. On the stormy night of October 11, 1861, four Confederate emissaries, seeking aid and arms from Britain and France, evaded the Union blockade at Charleston, South Carolina, went by ship to Havana, Cuba, and there boarded the British mail ship Trent, bound for Southampton, England.

 

The Trent was illegally stopped in the Bahama Channel, West Indies (November 8, 1861) by USS San Jacinto‘s Captain Charles Wilkes (1798-1877). Confederates James Murray Mason (1798-1871, from Virginia), John Slidell (1793-1871, from Louisiana), and their male secretaries were forcibly removed and imprisoned in Boston harbor’s Fort Warren Prison.

 

Anticipating war with the U. S., Britain sent 8,000 troops to Canada. But United States jingoism subsided. President Abraham Lincoln reportedly told his cabinet, “one war at a time,” gentlemen, got the cabinet on December 26, 1861, to disavow the illegal seizure, and released the Confederate prisoners on January 1, 1862. But resentments lingered.

 

Besides softening near war U .S.-British tensions, another reason behind the Peabody funeral honors was British leaders’ sincere appreciation for Peabody’s gift of homes for London’s working poor. Many marveled that an American would give that kind of gift in that large amount to a city and country not his own. Britons also valued Peabody’s two decades of efforts to improve United States-British relations.

 

Prime Minister Gladstone

 

On November 9, 1869, in a major speech at the Lord Mayor’s Day banquet, Prime Minister William Ewart Gladstone (1808-98) referred to British-U.S. difficulties and then mentioned Peabody’s death: “You will know that I refer to the death of Mr. Peabody, a man whose splendid benefactions…taught us in this commercial age…the most noble and needful of all lessons–how a man can be the master of his wealth instead of its slave [cheers].”

 

“And, my Lord Mayor,” Gladstone continued, “most touching it is to know, as I have learnt, that while, perhaps, some might think he had been unhappy in dying in a foreign land, yet so were his affections divided between the land of his birth and the home of his early ancestors, that…his [wish] has been realized–that he might be buried in America, [and] that it might please God to ordain that he should die in England [cheers]. My Lord Mayor, with the country of Mr. Peabody we are not likely to quarrel [loud cheers].”

 

Prime Minister Gladstone’s cabinet met at 2:00 P.M., November 10, 1869, and confirmed Queen Victoria’s suggestion of a Royal Navy ship to return Peabody’s remains. Peabody funeral researcher Allen Howard Welch wrote: “The Queen, in fact, was personally grieved, and it was her own request that a man-of-war be employed to return Peabody to his homeland.”

 

In the handing over ceremony of Peabody’s remains from U .S. Minister to Britain John Lothrop Motley to HMS Monarch‘s Captain John Edmund Commerell (1829-1901), December 11, 1869, Portsmouth, England, U. S. Minister Motley explained: “The President of the United States, when informed of the death of George Peabody, the great philanthropist, at once ordered an American ship to convey his remains to America. Simultaneously, the Queen appointed one of Her Majesty’s ships to perform that office. This double honor from the heads of two great nations to a simple American citizen is, like his gift to the poor, unprecedented. The President yields cordially to the wish of the Queen.”

 

Praise for the Peabody Homes of London, 1862

 

Peabody’s housing gift for London’s working poor was announced March 12, 1862, while the U. S. and Britain still raged over the September 1861 Trent Affair. Peabody’s gift evoked surprise and admiration in the British press, a sampling of which follows.

 

London Times, March 26, 1862: “Mr. George Peabody has placed £150,000 in the hands of a committee to relieve the condition of the poor of London. It is seldom that good works are done on such a scale as this one by an American in a city where he is only a sojourner…. [He] gives while he lives to those who can make no return…. He does this in a country not his own, in a city he may leave any day for his native land. Such an act is rare….”

 

London Daily Telegraph, March 27, 1862: “The noble gift of Mr. Peabody actually takes away the public breath…and sends a thrill through the public heart…. A man gives his fortune during his lifetime for an object going back to a resolution he had held more than a quarter of a century…to elevate the poor. Party strife and national bickering have not changed this good American; wars and rumours of wars have not turned him…from his…purpose.”

 

London Morning Herald, March 27, 1862: “One of the merchant princes of the world has just presented [London] with a gift for which thousands will bless his name…. Whilst his countrymen are warring…with each other, this generous American is working out…good-will among his adopted people.”

 

London Sun, March 27, 1862: ” How can England ever go to war with a nation whose leading man among us thus sympathizes with and blesses her poor? Who of us will not set the deed of Mr. Peabody…against that of Captain Wilkes….?”

 

London Review, March 29, 1862: “From America of late has come war, desolation, and animosity. The close ties of…friendships that linked Englishmen and Americans…seemed dissolved…. In the midst of this comes Mr. Peabody’s gift to discard prejudices on both sides of the Atlantic. We have had a desperate family quarrel, and almost come to blows; Mr. Peabody…by a well-timed act…awakens…better sentiments.”

 

Leeds Mercury, March 27, 1862: “An American citizen has now come forward to excite the wonder and admiration of the world.”

 

When friend and sometime agent Horatio Gates Somerby (1805-72), a Vermont-born London resident genealogist, sent Peabody these London newspaper clippings, Peabody replied: “I had not the least conception that it would cause so much excitement over the country.”

 

British Honors

 

British honors evoked by Peabody’s gift to London included membership in the ancient guild of the Clothworkers’ Company of London (July 2, 1862). He was granted the Freedom of the City of London (July 10, 1862), the first of only five American so honored; others being President U. S. Grant, June 15, 1877; President Theodore Roosevelt, May 3, 1910; General John J. Pershing, July 18, 1919; and President Dwight D. Eisenhower, June 1, 1945.

 

Peabody had been denied membership in London’s Reform Club (1844) when Americans were disdained because nine U. S. states had stopped interest payments on their bonds sold abroad. When payment was resumed retroactively Peabody, who had publicly urged this course, was admitted to the Parthenon Club (1848), the City of London Club (1850), and the most prestigious Athenaeum Club (March 12, 1862).

 

The Fishmongers’ Company of London made Peabody an honorary member (April 18, 1866). When Oxford University granted him an honorary Doctor of Laws degree (June 26, 1867), undergraduates cheered, waved their caps, and beat the arms of their chairs with the flat of their hands. Jackson’s Oxford Journal (June 29, 1867) recorded: “The lion of the day was beyond a doubt, Mr. Peabody.”

 

Peabody’s seated statue, sculptured and cast by Salem, Massachusetts-born William Wetmore Story (1819-95), paid for by public subscription, was unveiled July 23, 1869, on London’s Threadneedle Street, near the Royal Exchange, by Queen Victoria’s eldest son, the Prince of Wales, later King Edward VII. The only four statues of Americans in London include George Peabody (1869), Abraham Lincoln (1920), George Washington (1921), and Franklin Delano Roosevelt (1948).

 

Queen Victoria and George Peabody

 

Queen Victoria’s advisors had informed Her Majesty that, when asked privately, Peabody had declined either a baronetcy or the Grand Cross of the Order of the Bath. To accept would be to lose his U. S. citizenship, which he felt he could not do.

 

Her Majesty’s Foreign Secretary Lord John Russell (1792-1878) suggested instead a letter from the Queen and the gift of a miniature portrait of the Queen, such as was given to foreign ambassadors who signed a treaty with Britain.

 

The Queen’s letter to Peabody, March 28, 1866, expressed thanks for his “noble act of more than princely munificence…to relieve the wants of her poor subjects residing in London. It is an act…wholly without parallel…. “The Queen…understands Mr. Peabody to feel himself debarred from accepting [other] distinctions.” [She asks him instead] “to accept a miniature portrait of herself, which she will have painted for him, and which…can…be sent to him in America.”

 

Peabody thanked the Queen by letter on April 3, 1866. He received Her Majesty’s miniature portrait from British Ambassador Sir Frederick Bruce (1814-67) in Washington, D.C., March 1867. It was 14″ long by 10″ wide, had been especially painted for him by British artist F. A. C. Tilt, baked on enamel, and set in a sold gold frame, said to have cost $70,000. It was deposited in a specially built vault, with Peabody’s other honors, in the Peabody Institute Library, Peabody, Massachusetts.

 

MP John Bright to the Queen on George Peabody

 

British statesman and Member of Parliament John Bright (1811-89), who had befriended Peabody from 1867 and had gone fishing with him on the Shannon River, Limerick, Ireland, dined with the Queen, December 30, 1868. Bright recorded in his diary the conversation: “Some remarks were made about Mr. Peabody: it arose from something about Ireland, and my having been there on a visit to him. [The Queen] remarked what a very rich man he must be, and how great his gifts.”

 

[Bright recorded that Peabody] “told me how he valued the portrait [the Queen] had given him, that he made a sort of shrine for it, and that it was a thing of great interest in America. Peabody then “said to me, ‘The Americans are as fond of your Queen as the English are.’ To which she replied, ‘Yes, the American people have also been kind to me.”

 

Queen Victoria’s Second Letter to Peabody

 

Leaving London suddenly on what he knew would be his last U. S. visit, Peabody was in Salem, Massachusetts, when he received Queen Victoria’s second letter. She wrote (June 20, 1869): “The Queen is very sorry that Mr. Peabody’s sudden departure has made it impossible for her to see him before he left England, and she is concerned to hear that he is gone in bad health.”

 

The Queen continued: “She now writes him a line to express her hope that he may return to this country quite recovered, and that she may then have the opportunity, of which she has now been deprived, of seeing him and offering him her personal thanks for all he has done for the people.”

 

Publishing the Queen’s letter, a New York Times article added: “Queen Victoria has paid our great countryman a delicate and graceful compliment. Mr. Peabody left England unexpectedly, his departure known only to a few friends. His feeble health became known to the Queen through London newspapers. With her goodness of heart which Americans never fail to appreciate she sent him a personal letter.” On July 19, 1869, Peabody replied, assuring the Queen of his “heartfelt gratitude.”

 

Queen Victoria’s Last Contact

 

Learning of Peabody’s hasty return to London (October 8, 1869), before she knew of his precarious condition, she asked her privy councilor Arthur Helps (1813-75) to invite Peabody to visit her at Windsor Castle. Helps wrote to Sir Curtis Lampson in whose London home Peabody rested (Oct. 30, 1869): “‘Regarding Mr. Peabody, the Queen thinks the best way would be for her to ask him down to Windsor for one or two nights, where he could rest–and need not come to dinner, or any meals if he feels unequal to it; but where she could see him quietly at any time of the day most convenient to him.” But it was too late. Largely unconscious his last days, Peabody died November 4, 1869.

 

U. S. Honors

 

Chief among Peabody’s U. S. honors was the U. S. Congressional Resolution of Thanks and Gold Medal for his PEF, passed in the U.S. Senate (March 8, 1867), in the U. S. House (March 9, 1867), and signed by President Andrew Johnson (March 16, 1867), who welcomed Peabody at the White House (April 25, 1867). These, his Honorary Doctor of Laws degree from Harvard University (July 17, 1867), and his other honors received in the U. S. and England, are displayed in the Peabody Institute Library, Peabody, Massachusetts.

 

Robert Charles Winthrop’s Eulogy, February 8, 1870

 

All was ready for the final act: Winthrop’s eulogy of George Peabody, February 8, 1870, a bitterly cold day. Thousands poured into tiny Peabody, Massachusetts, by special morning trains which ran full from Boston. Large crowds were quiet and respectful. The 50 state troopers had little to do but give directions.

 

South Congregational Church filled quickly. Queen Victoria’s son, Prince Arthur (1850-1942), in the seventh pew from the pulpit, held all eyes. His retinue, including British Minister to the U. S. Sir Edward Thornton, sat nearby.

 

Behind Prince Arthur sat HMS Monarch Captain John E. Commerell, USS Plymouth’s Captain William H. Macomb, Admiral Farragut’s staff, Massachusetts Governor William Claflin, Maine Governor Joshua L. Chamberlain, the mayors of eight New England cities, Harvard University President Charles William Eliot (1834-1926), and others.

 

On the first six rows sat Peabody’s relatives, elderly citizens who knew him in youth, and the trustees of his institutes and funds. Anthems were sung. Scripture was read. Robert Charles Winthrop rose to give the eulogy.

 

Robert Charles Winthrop was the descendant of an early governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, a Harvard University graduate, trained in Daniel Webster’s law office, member and Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, Peabody’s philanthropic advisor, and the PEF board of trustees president.

 

Winthrop began: “What a career this has been whose final scene lies before us! Who can contemplate his rise from lowly beginnings to these final royal honors without admiration? His death, painless and peaceful, came after he completed his great dream and saw his old friends and loved ones.”

 

Winthrop continued: “He had ambition and wanted to do grand things in a grand way. His public charity is too well known to bear repetition and I believe he also did much private good which remains unknown. The trusts he established, the institutes he founded, the buildings he raised stand before all eyes.”

 

“I have authority for saying,” Winthrop continued, “that he planned these for many years, for in private talks he told me all he planned and when I expressed my amazement at the magnitude of his purpose, he said to me with guileless simplicity: ‘Why Mr. Winthrop, this is no new idea to me. From the earliest of my manhood, I have contemplated some such disposition of my property; and I have prayed my heavenly Father, day by day, that I might be enabled, before I died, to show my gratitude for the blessings which He has bestowed upon me by doing some great good to my fellow-men.’”

 

The words underlined above are engraved on Peabody’s marker in Westminster Abbey, London, where his remains rested for 30 days, November 12-December 11, 1869. That marker and the above words on it were refurbished for the February 12, 1995, bicentennial ceremony of Peabody’s birth held in London’s Westminster Abbey.

 

Winthrop further said: “To measure his gifts in dollars and pounds or in the number of people served is inadequate. He did something more. The successful way he arranged the machinery of world-wide philanthropy compels attention. It is a lesson that cannot be lost to history. It has inspired and will continue to inspire others to do likewise. This was the greatness of his life.”

 

“Now, all that is mortal of him,” Winthrop said, “comes back, borne with honors that mark a conquering hero. The battle he fought was the greed within him. His conquest was the victory he achieved over the gaining, hoarding, saving instinct. Such is the conqueror we make ready to bury in the earth this day.

 

Winthrop continued: “And so was fulfilled for him a prophecy he heard once as the subject of a sermon, on which by some force of reflection lingered in his mind and which he more than once mentioned to me: ‘And it shall come to pass in that day, that the light shall not be clear nor dark; but it shall be one day which shall be known to the Lord, not day, or night: but it shall come to pass that at evening time it shall be light.’” Winthrop said that Peabody first heard this text, Zechariah 14: 6-7, in a sermon by the Reverend Dr. John Lothrop (1772-1820) of Brattle Street, Boston, date not known.

 

Winthrop concluded: “And so we bid thee farewell, noble friend. The village of thy birth weeps. The flower of Essex County stands at thy grave. Massachusetts mourns her son. Maine does honor to thee. New England and Old England join hands because of thee. The children of the South praise thy works. Chiefs of the Republic stand with royalty at thy bier. And so we bid thee farewell, friend of mankind.”

 

Harmony Grove Cemetery, Salem, Mass.

 

A New York Times described the final burial scene at Harmony Grove Cemetery, Salem, Massachusetts, on February 8, 1870: “There were about two hundred sleigh coaches in the procession. The route was shortened somewhat in consequence of the prevalence of the storm. On arriving at the Peabody tomb, there was no special service, the coffin being placed reverently therein, after which the procession returned to the Institute, and the great pageantry attending the obsequies of the great philanthropist was ended.”

 

Harmony Grove Cemetery’s 65 acres of avenues and walks, first laid out in 1840, had been a thick walnut grove when Peabody was a boy. He could see it from the attic of the house where he was born. On a knoll where he had once played he had chosen the family burial plot on Anemone Ave., lot number 51. There, where he had brought together the remains of his mother, father, sisters, and brothers, he was laid to rest. Ninety-six days of unprecedented funeral honors had ended. His works remain. Public memory of him has since grown dim, except at his institutes and among those who care to search the records.

 

Memory has also dimmed of those few days that summer of 1869 at White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia, when two old men, one from Massachusetts, the other from Virginia, turned from Civil War strife to the healing power of education. One, a lifelong soldier, had become president of a struggling college; the other, a volunteer for 14 days in the War of 1812, merchant, London-based banker, and creator of philanthropic institutions.

 

The two old men walked arm in arm, enjoyed each other, spoke of educating new generations, of reconciliation, of healing, and of better days ahead.

 

End.

 

For ERIC (Education Resources Information) abstract of above article, access:
http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/Home.portal?_nfpb=true&ERICExtSearch_Descriptor=%22Reconstruction+Era%22&_pageLabel=RecordDetails&objectId=0900019b800be63f&accno=ED444917&_nfls=falsehttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/Home.portal?_nfpb=true&ERICExtSearch_Descriptor=%22Reconstruction+Era%22&_pageLabel=RecordDetails&objectId=0900019b800be63f&accno=ED444917&_nfls=false

 

For a full copy of above article, access:

 

http://users.multipro.com/bfparker/LeeRE_GP.html

 

For other copies of above article in blog form from google.com under—bfparker, Lee and Peabody—try accessing:

 

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=bfparker%2C+Lee%2C+Peabody&btnG=Google+Search

 

For free E-Book content access to Franklin Parker, George Peabody, A Biography. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 1995 rev. edn. (now out of print), try:

 

http://books.google.com/books?id=OPIbk-ZPnF4C&dq=franklin+parker&printsec=frontcover&source=web&ots=qxV3RqTk1k&sig=sXAmDL_CyCYd-Sl0n_IRl7g1S1I#PPP1,M1

 

End.

“Martin Luther King, Jr.: Prophet in the Making.” By Franklin and Betty J. Parker, bfparker@frontiernet.net

“Martin Luther King, Jr.:  Prophet in the Making.”

By Franklin and Betty J. Parker, bfparker@frontiernet.net

(First appeared as “The Making of a Prophet,” Lion and the Lamb. Crossville [Tenn.] Chronicle, January 17, 1996, p. 4A.; then again as “King Became a Prophet of His Time,” Lion and the Lamb. Crossville [Tenn.] Chronicle, January 12, 2005, pp. 4A, 5A.

Martin Luther King, Jr. Day Almost Wasn’t.

Martin Luther King, Jr. Day as an official U.S. national holiday almost did not happen.  After King’s assassination, April 4, 1968, African American organizations and a few states honored his birthday.  But opponents in the U.S. House and Senate blocked adoption of the holiday for 15 years.  On Nov. 2, 1983, the U.S. Congress officially made the third Monday in January Martin Luther King, Jr. Day.

His father, Martin Luther King, Sr., was the powerful pastor of Atlanta’s Ebenezer Baptist Church.  Born in Atlanta, Ga., young Martin attended a segregated elementary school, then Atlanta University’s private laboratory school, followed by Booker T. Washington High School, Morehouse College, and then Crozer Theological Seminary, near Philadelphia.

At Crozer Theological Seminary he attended the wedding of fellow student Walter Stark to Dorothy Stark (who both live near the authors at Uplands Retirement Village, Pleasant Hill, Tenn.).  It was at Crozer that the budding scholar honed his practice sermons that were to sway local, national, and world audiences.

Besides family and church, King was influenced by reading Henry David Thoreau’s On Civil Disobedience, which influenced Leo Tolstoy, whose pacifism influenced Mohandas K. Gandhi’s nonviolent resistance to unjust laws.  King was also influenced by Walter Rauschenbusch’s Christianity and the Social Crisis, which inspired the social gospel movement.  He was influenced also by Reinhold Niebuhr’s Moral Man and Immoral Society, which held that besides the social gospel’s lifting of the lowly, spiritual forces must organize to battle evil.

He earned a Ph.D. in Religion at Boston University, where he met and married Coretta Scott, a music student from Marion, Alabama, and an Antioch College (Ohio) graduate.  Having served as assistant pastor in his father’s Ebenezer Baptist Church, Atlanta, King then accepted the pastorate of Dexter Avenue Baptist Church, Montgomery, Alabama.

The Rosa Parks Bus Incident

On September 1, 1954, Martin and Coretta moved to Montgomery, Alabama, where, soon after the birth of their first child, Yolanda, the Rosa Parks incident swept King into the civil rights movement.

On Friday, Dec. 1, 1955, tired and heading home after a hard day’s work, African American seamstress Mrs. Rosa Parks sat in a nearly empty bus.  All seats were soon filled.  A white man boarded.  The driver ordered seated African Americans to stand in back of the bus.  Three did so.  Rosa Parks refused, was arrested, booked, fingerprinted, and jailed.

Her mother phoned E. D. Nixon, African American railway porter and a past president of the local National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.  Knowing Rosa Parks as part-time NAACP secretary and respected community member, Nixon and local NAACP leaders saw the Rosa Parks court case as winnable.  She agreed to fight the case through the Alabama courts up to the U.S. Supreme Court.

News of her arrest spread quickly.  Local NAACP women worked all Saturday night, Dec. 2, mimeographing a notice distributed Sunday in Montgomery’s African American churches.  The notice called for a one-day bus boycott (60% of all bus riders were African Americans) on Monday, December 5, 1955, the day of Rosa Parks’s court appearance.
Amazingly, the Dec. 5, 1955, bus boycott succeeded.  Boycott leaders debated if they should stop or continue the boycott, knowing the possibly dire consequences of a white backlash.

Boycott leaders formed the Montgomery Improvement Society (forerunner of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference).  Because he was new to Montgomery and not connected with any faction, young Dr. King was elected president of the Montgomery group to discuss next steps for protesting that incident.  Tension was high.  To extend the small one-day boycott victory was likely to evoke the wrath of the powerful white structure, retribution by its brutal police, loss of jobs, loss of everything they had.  King was asked to speak about next steps at a Tuesday night, Dec. 6, church rally.

Earlier at Myles Horton’s Highlander Adult Education Center, TN
King and Rosa Parks had earlier, separately, attended interracial workshops at Highlander Adult Education Center, Monteagle, Grundy County, Tennessee.  Highlander was founded by Tennessee-born Myles Horton. 

Rosa Parks later said that attending Horton’s Highlander enabled her to stand fast in Montgomery.  Sadly, another Tennessee connection was King’s 1968 assassination in Memphis.

A Crossville, Tennessee, connection involved Myles Horton, who early sought advice from Crossville’s Congregational minister Abram Nightingale on how to found an interracial adult school to solve community problems.  Nightingale encouraged Myles Horton to study at Union Theological Seminary, which led Horton to the University of Chicago, then to Denmark to study folk schools, and afterward to  found Highlander.

Highlander’s interracial workshops for 1930’s coal mine labor union leaders, 1940s cotton mill union leaders, and 1950s-60s civil rights leaders like King and Rosa Parks were pioneer efforts.  “We Shall Overcome,” the civil rights song heard round the world, early became popular at Highlander.

King’s Dec. 6, 1955, Montgomery Bus Boycott Speech

Tuesday night, Dec. 6, 1955, African Americans packed the Montgomery church.  A spillover crowd estimated at some 10,000 listened to outside loudspeakers.  King had little time to prepare his remarks.  He nervously entered the jam-packed church meeting, mounted the pulpit bathed in lights, faced the TV cameras, and addressed the expectant audience (his slightly shortened remarks follow):

We are here as American citizens seeking fairness on Montgomery buses where seating is a problem of long standing.  [General murmurs of assent.]

Last Thursday, one of our finest citizens was taken from a bus, arrested, and jailed because she refused to give up her seat to a white person.  [Scattered "Yeses, "Amens," and "That's So".]

If it had to happen, I am glad it happened to a person like Mrs. Parks.  Nobody can doubt her integrity, or the height of her character, or the depth of her Christian commitment.  [Strong choruses of "That's right," "That's right".].

And just because she refused to get up, she was arrested.  [Angry stirring from the crowd.]

There comes a time when people get tired of being trampled over by the iron feet of oppression.  [Many quick "Yes," "Yes," "Yeses" dissolved into rising cheers and applause]

There comes a time when people get tired of being thrown across the abyss of humiliation to experience the bleakness of nagging despair.  [Stomping of feet. The wooden floor shook, echoing in the rafters.]

There comes a time when people get tired of being pushed out of the glittering sunlight and left standing in the chill of November.  [He had touched a nerve.  The crowd now drowned him out.]

We are here because we are tired now.  We are not here advocating violence.  We have overcome that.  [A voice shouted, "Repeat that! Repeat that!"]

I want it known in Montgomery and throughout this nation that we are Christian people.  The only weapon we have in our hands this evening is the weapon of protest.  [Long shouts of approval.]

If we were behind the iron curtain in a communist nation we couldn’t do this.  But the great glory of American democracy is the right to protest.  [Loud shouts.  Clapping of hands.  Pride in a speaker from whom such rhetoric rolled so easily.]

[Separating his audience's protest from the Ku Klux Klan and white citizens councils, King went on]:  There will be no crosses burned and no white persons pulled out of their homes and murdered….We are going to work with determination to achieve justice on the buses.  We are not wrong in what we are doing.  [Shouts, yells, cheering.]
If we are wrong, the U.S. Supreme Court is wrong.  [King rocked.  His audience rocked with him.]

If we are wrong, God Almighty is wrong.  [The crowd exploded.  The church rafters shook.]

If we are wrong, Jesus of Nazareth was a utopian dreamer and never came down to earth.  If we are wrong, justice is a lie.  [Roars, applause, rapture mixed with pride in themselves and in their speaker.]

We are determined here in Montgomery to fight until justice runs down like water, and righteousness like a mighty stream.  [Pandemonium as listeners recognized the words of the Prophet Amos.]

It is not enough for us to talk about love, a pinnacle of the Christian faith.  The other side is justice.  God is not just the God of love.  He is also the God that standeth before the nations and says, “Be still and know that I am God.  Obey me, or I will cast you out.”  [Shouts, clapping, stamping of feet in cadenced rhythm.]

We are using the tools of persuasion but we must also use the tools of coercion.  [King concluded. amid cheers, applause, and cries of "Oh, Yes! Oh, Yes! Oh, Yes!"]

King stepped from the pulpit and was embraced by well wishers.

He would be arrested, jailed, his house bombed, his life threatened.

He would give other even greater speeches, would be fatally shot at age 39, but his oratory that Dec. 1955 night made him at age 26 a public figure and a prophet.

End.

For above article in blog form, access:
http://www.manicfish.com/myblog.php?bbn=bfparker&story_id=12751
For google.com blogs on above topic under– bfparker, Martin Luther King, Jr., Prophet in the Making, access:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=bfparker%2C+Martin+Luther+King%2C+Jr.%2C+Prophet+in+the+Making&btnG=Search
and:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=bfparker%2C+Martin+Luther+King%2C+Jr.&btnG=Google+Search

End.

“William Heard Kilpatrick (Nov. 20, 1871-Feb. 13, 1965), Progressive Educator and Philosopher.” By Franklin and Betty J. Parker, bfparker@frontiernet.net

“William Heard Kilpatrick (Nov. 20, 1871-Feb. 13, 1965), Progressive Educator and Philosopher.”

By Franklin and Betty J. Parker, bfparker@frontiernet.net

William Heard Kilpatrick (Nov. 20, 1871-Feb. 13, 1965), educator and philosopher of progressive education, was born in White Plains, GA, son of James Hines Kilpatrick, a Southern Baptist minister, and Edna Perrin Heard, a teacher.

Kilpatrick had an orthodox upbringing and did well in school. In 1888 he entered the sophomore class at Mercer University (Baptist, Macon, GA), excelled in mathematics, and earned the B.A. degree in 1891. A Mercer trustee encouraged him to study mathematics and physics at Johns Hopkins University, 1891-92. There he was transported from a conservative rural atmosphere to a liberal community of inquiring scholars. Mercer granted him the M.A. degree in 1892 for his Johns Hopkins graduate study. Because of administrative changes, he did not get a hoped-for Mercer teaching job.

His first teaching post at Blakely Institute, a combined elementary and secondary public school in southwest Georgia, required that he attend a July 1892 summer session at Rock College Normal School, Athens, GA. There he learned of the educational theories of German educator Friedrich Froebel, kindergarten founder and learning-through-play advocate (Kilpatrick later wrote Froebel’s Kindergarten Principles Critically Examined, New York: Macmillan, 1916); and of Swiss educator Johann Heinrich Pestalozzi, who urged teaching by encouragement without harsh discipline.

Kilpatrick was impressed by Education Professor Otis Ashmore, who told of the interest stimulated among his students at Chatham Academy, Savannah, GA, so that they studied without supervision in his absence. Ashmore’s example, Kilpatrick later wrote, was the origin for his 1918 project method article.

At an April 8, 1893, Chautauqua tent meeting at nearby Albany, GA, Kilpatrick heard visiting Cook County (IL) Normal School director and progressive educator Francis Wayland Parker. He then read Leila E. Patridge, The “Quincy Method” Illustrated (New York: E.L. Kellogg, 1885), describing Francis Wayland Parker’s successful progressive education methods used while he was Quincy, MA, school superintendent. He taught mathematics in the eighth, ninth, and tenth grades at Blakely; was co-principal, 1892-95; and there he first experimented with non-traditional teaching and administration.

Kilpatrick again studied at Johns Hopkins University, summer 1895; then taught seventh grade at and was principal of Anderson Elementary School, Savannah, GA, 1896-97. He also studied at the University of Chicago under John Dewey, summer 1898, later noting that he was not initially impressed by Dewey. He was at Mercer University, 1897-1906, taught mathematics, was vice president, 1900, and acting president, 1904-06, but resigned when the trustees were concerned about his doubting the virgin birth.

While at Mercer University Kilpatrick attended summer sessions at Cornell University, summer 1900, under Charles de Garmo, disciple of Johann Friedrich Herbart, and a Rockefeller Foundation-sponsored summer school for teachers, Knoxville, TN, where he heard psychologist G. Stanley Hall. Kilpatrick taught in Columbus, OH, in 1906-07 before enrolling as a student at Teachers College, Columbia University (hereafter TCCU), in 1907. TCCU Dean James Earl Russell had merged progressivism and professionalism to make TCCU a leading U.S. teacher education center. Kilpatrick studied under John Dewey, who had left Chicago for Columbia University in 1904; studied under Paul Monroe, major U.S. educational historian; under E. L. Thorndike, and others.

Kilpatrick impressed Paul Monroe in a class paper documenting the beginning of Dutch schools in New Amsterdam (New York) in 1638 (not 1633, as previously believed). Teaching history of education part time, Kilpatrick began a dissertation on Benedict Spinoza, did not find enough material, returned to the origin of Dutch schools, and completed his dissertation in 1911. Paul Monroe helped get Kilpatrick’s dissertation published by the Department of the Interior as The Dutch Schools of New Netherland and Colonial New York. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1912).

In 1908 Kilpatrick wrote in his diary, “Professor Dewey has made a great difference in my thinking.” Dewey wrote to Professor John A. MacVannel, Kilpatrick’s major professor, “He [Kilpatrick] is the best I ever had.” Kilpatrick spent the rest of his professional career and long life at TCCU where he was a student, 1907-09; received the Ph.D. in 1912, was lecturer in education, 1909-11; assistant professor, 1911-15; associate professor, 1915-18; professor of philosophy of education, 1918-37; and thereafter emeritus professor.

Kilpatrick was catapulted to fame by his 1918 article, “The Project Method,” Teachers College Record, 19 (September 1918), pp. 319-335. By “project” Kilpatrick meant any purposeful learning activity which the student wanted to do wholeheartedly. This active, interest-motivated, and life-like activity was seized upon by progressive teachers as a useful curriculum device. Course content was divided into units or projects students could complete alone or in small groups under teacher guidance. The project method, seen as a welcome antidote to traditional education, gave Dewey’s child-centered education a practical teaching methodology and helped the shift from subject-and teacher-based education to child-centered education. It was popular in progressive elementary schools in the 1930s and was revived in the open classroom atmosphere of the late 1960s.

Kilpatrick commanded attention at TCCU by his courtly manner, erect posture, and lion-like mane of silvery white hair. He attracted students by using small group discussions. With notable skill he divided educational problems among small groups in a large class, each group discussed a specific problem, a group chair reported findings to the large class (numbering in the hundreds), followed by discussion and debate. His success in this procedure earned for him the title of the “Million Dollar Professor,” which came from the headline of a New York Post article (March 6, 1937) by David Davidson, estimating that his 35,000 graduate students paid over a million dollars in tuition fees to TCCU before he retired in 1937.

Kilpatrick married Marie Beman Guyton (they had three children) on December 27, l898 (she died May 1907). He then married Margaret Manigault Pinckney on November 26, 1908 (she died November 1938). He finally married Marion Y. Ostrander on May 8, 1940 (she had been his secretary).

He taught summers at the University of Georgia, 1906, 1908, and 1909; the University of the South (Knoxville), 1907; was visiting professor, Northwestern University, 1937-38, and taught summer sessions there, 1939, 1940, 1941; taught a summer session at Stanford University, 1938; the University of Kentucky, 1942; the University of North Carolina, 1942; and the University of Minnesota, 1946.

Kilpatrick’s trips abroad included school visits, lectures, and meetings with prominent educators in Italy, Switzerland, and France, May-June 1912; Europe and Asia, August 1926 to June 1927; and round the world, August to December 1929.

He received honorary LL.D. degrees from Mercer University, 1926; Columbia University, 1929; and Bennington College, 1938 (which he helped found in 1923 and where he was president of the board of trustees, 1931-38); the honorary D.H.L. degree from the College of Jewish Studies, 1952; and the Brandeis Award for humanitarian service, 1953.

After retiring from TCCU, 1937, he was president of the New York Urban League, 1941-51; chairman of American Youth for World Youth, 1946-51; chairman of the Bureau of International Education, 1940-51; and on the board of directors of the League for Industrial Democracy.

Kilpatrick had severe critics but many more admirers and followers. His eighty-fifth birthday, November 20, 1956, celebrated at Horace Mann Auditorium, TCCU, resulted in a special March 1957 issue of Progressive Education, “William Heard Kilpatrick Eighty-Fifth Anniversary,” containing 10 articles. Both heralded and criticized as John Dewey’s chief educational interpreter, Kilpatrick was a leading advocate of progressive education. He died after a long illness at age 93 on February 13, 1965.

References

Kilpatrick gave to the Special Collections, Teachers College Library, Columbia University a handwritten diary (begun 1904) of over 40 volumes, scrapbooks, unpublished papers, and a two-volume typescript from taped interviews with his biographer, Samuel Tenenbaum. An oral history memoir is in the Special Collections, Butler Library, Columbia University Archives. His 14 books and 375 articles are listed in “Writings of William Heard Kilpatrick,” Studies in Philosophy and Education, Vol. 1 (November 1961), pp. 220-230.

His More Important Books Include:

1. Foundations of Method, New York: Macmillan, 1925, which expands on his project method (translated into Chinese, Japanese, and Russian).
Education for a Changing Civilization, Macmillan, 1926 (translated into Japanese, Russian, Arabic, Portuguese, German, and Italian).

2. Education and the Social Crisis, A Proposed Program, New York: Liveright, 1932.

3. The Educational Frontier, New York: Appleton-Century, 1933, containing his articles and articles by other leading progressives (he was the book editor). This book said to be the characteristic progressivist work of the 1930s.

4. Group Education for a Democracy, New York: Association Press, 1940 (translated into Japanese, Korean, and Spanish).

5. Philosophy of Education, New York, 1951 (translated into Spanish).

Biographies and Bio-Sketches:

1. Samuel Tenenbaum, William Heard Kilpatrick: Trailblazer in Education, New York: Harper, 1951, is his authorized biography based on taped interviews.

2. William Graebner, “William Heard Kilpatrick” in the Dictionary of American Biography, Supplement Seven, 1961-1965, John A. Garraty, editor, New York, Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1981, pp. 434-436.

3. Franklin Parker, “William Heard Kilpatrick, 1871-1965,” School and Society, Vol. 93, No. 2264 (October 16, 1965), pp. 368-371.

On Kilpatrick’s Influence:

1. John L. Childs, American Pragmatism and Education, New York: Holt, 1956.

2. Lawrence A. Cremin, The Transformation of the School: Progressivism in American Education,1876-1957, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1961.

3. Ernst Papanek, “William Heard Kilpatrick’s International Influence: Teacher of World’s Teachers,” Progressive Education, Vol.34, No.2 (March 1957), pp. 54-57 (entire issue has 10 evaluative articles honoring Kilpatrick on his eighty-fifth birthday).

4. “W. H. Kilpatrick: After 93 Years,” Teachers College Record, Vol. 66, No.4 (January 1965), pp. 346-364, containing three articles.

5. Topical selections from his writings are compared with others in Leslie R. Perry, editor, Bertrand Russell, A.S. Neill, Homer Lane, W.H. Kilpatrick: Four Progressive Educators, London: Collier-Macmillan, 1967.

6. Thirteen contributors evaluated his influence in a special issue on “William Heard Kilpatrick, 1875-1965,” Educational Theory, Vol. 16, No.1 (January 1966), 98 pp.

Kilpatrick Critics:

1. Albert Lynd, Quackery in the Public Schools, New York: Grosset and Dunlap, 1953, pp. 212-253.

2. Augustin G. Rudd, Bending the Twig: The Revolution in Education and Its Effect on Our Children, New York: Sons of the American Revolution, 1957.

3. Catholic critic is Joseph McGlade, Progressive Educators and the Catholic Church, Westminster, MD: Newman Press, 1953.

Kilpatrick Obituaries:

1. The New York Times, February 14, 1965, p. 92.

2. New York Herald Tribune, February 15, 1965.

3. San Francisco Chronicle, February 15, 1965, p. 26.

End.

For above article in blog form, try accessing these URLs:

http://bfparker.blog.com/1827343/

and

http://bfparker.blogster.com/educator_william_h_kilpatrick.htmland

http://smoothlaunch.com/bfparker/2007/09/03/william-heard-kilpatrick-nov-20-1871-feb-13-1965-progressive-educator-and-philosopher-by-franklin-and-betty-j-parker-bfparkerfrontiernetnet/

For google.com blogs of above article under—bfparker, William Heard Kilpatrick–, try:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=bfparker%2C+William+Heard+Kilpatrick&btnG=Google+Search

End.